Index: trunk/ippTools/src/pstamptool.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/ippTools/src/pstamptool.c	(revision 29289)
+++ trunk/ippTools/src/pstamptool.c	(revision 29328)
@@ -883,7 +883,8 @@
     PXOPT_LOOKUP_S64(req_id,    config->args, "-req_id", false, false);
     PXOPT_LOOKUP_S64(dep_id,    config->args, "-dep_id", false, false);
-
-    if (!job_id && !req_id && !dep_id) {
-        psError(PS_ERR_UNKNOWN, true, "at least one of -job_id -req_id or -dep_id is required");
+    PXOPT_LOOKUP_S32(fault_count, config->args, "-fault_count",  false, false);
+
+    if (!job_id && !req_id && !dep_id && !fault_count) {
+        psError(PS_ERR_UNKNOWN, true, "at least one of -job_id -req_id -dep_id or -fault_count is required");
         return false;
     }
@@ -904,4 +905,6 @@
     PXOPT_COPY_S32(config->args, where, "-fault",  "pstampJob.fault", "==");
     PXOPT_COPY_STR(config->args, where, "-state",  "pstampJob.state", "==");
+    PXOPT_COPY_S32(config->args, where, "-fault_count", "pstampJob.fault_count", ">=");
+    pxAddLabelSearchArgs(config, where, "-label", "pstampRequest.label", "LIKE");
 
     psString query = pxDataGet("pstamptool_updatejob.sql");
@@ -948,4 +951,8 @@
     PXOPT_COPY_S64(config->args, where, "-dep_id", "dep_id", "==");
     PXOPT_COPY_S32(config->args, where, "-fault",  "pstampDependent.fault", "==");
+    pxAddLabelSearchArgs(config, where, "-label", "pstampRequest.label", "LIKE");
+    // if (fault_count) {
+        PXOPT_COPY_S32(config->args, where, "-fault_count", "pstampDependent.fault_count", ">=");
+    // }
 
     // XXX: How about selecting by pstampRequest.label? No. That is too dangerous by itself.