Index: trunk/ippTools/src/pstamptool.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/ippTools/src/pstamptool.c	(revision 29569)
+++ trunk/ippTools/src/pstamptool.c	(revision 29993)
@@ -950,9 +950,12 @@
     PXOPT_COPY_S64(config->args, where, "-job_id", "job_id", "==");
     PXOPT_COPY_S64(config->args, where, "-dep_id", "dep_id", "==");
+
+    PXOPT_COPY_S64(config->args, where, "-stage_id", "stage_id", "==");
+    PXOPT_COPY_STR(config->args, where, "-component", "component", "==");
+
     PXOPT_COPY_S32(config->args, where, "-fault",  "pstampDependent.fault", "==");
+
     pxAddLabelSearchArgs(config, where, "-label", "pstampRequest.label", "LIKE");
-    // if (fault_count) {
-        PXOPT_COPY_S32(config->args, where, "-fault_count", "pstampDependent.fault_count", ">=");
-    // }
+    PXOPT_COPY_S32(config->args, where, "-fault_count", "pstampDependent.fault_count", ">=");
 
     // XXX: How about selecting by pstampRequest.label? No. That is too dangerous by itself.