Index: /trunk/ippTools/src/pstamptool.c
===================================================================
--- /trunk/ippTools/src/pstamptool.c	(revision 29992)
+++ /trunk/ippTools/src/pstamptool.c	(revision 29993)
@@ -950,9 +950,12 @@
     PXOPT_COPY_S64(config->args, where, "-job_id", "job_id", "==");
     PXOPT_COPY_S64(config->args, where, "-dep_id", "dep_id", "==");
+
+    PXOPT_COPY_S64(config->args, where, "-stage_id", "stage_id", "==");
+    PXOPT_COPY_STR(config->args, where, "-component", "component", "==");
+
     PXOPT_COPY_S32(config->args, where, "-fault",  "pstampDependent.fault", "==");
+
     pxAddLabelSearchArgs(config, where, "-label", "pstampRequest.label", "LIKE");
-    // if (fault_count) {
-        PXOPT_COPY_S32(config->args, where, "-fault_count", "pstampDependent.fault_count", ">=");
-    // }
+    PXOPT_COPY_S32(config->args, where, "-fault_count", "pstampDependent.fault_count", ">=");
 
     // XXX: How about selecting by pstampRequest.label? No. That is too dangerous by itself.
Index: /trunk/ippTools/src/pstamptoolConfig.c
===================================================================
--- /trunk/ippTools/src/pstamptoolConfig.c	(revision 29992)
+++ /trunk/ippTools/src/pstamptoolConfig.c	(revision 29993)
@@ -178,4 +178,6 @@
     psMetadataAddS64(stopdependentjobArgs, PS_LIST_TAIL,  "-job_id", 0,       "job_id of jobs to update", 0);
     psMetadataAddS64(stopdependentjobArgs, PS_LIST_TAIL,  "-dep_id", 0,       "dep_id of jobs to update", 0);
+    psMetadataAddS64(stopdependentjobArgs, PS_LIST_TAIL,  "-stage_id", 0,     "stage_id of jobs to update", 0);
+    psMetadataAddStr(stopdependentjobArgs, PS_LIST_TAIL,  "-component", 0,    "component of jobs to update", NULL);
     psMetadataAddS16(stopdependentjobArgs, PS_LIST_TAIL,  "-fault", 0,        "current value for dependent fault", 0);
     psMetadataAddS32(stopdependentjobArgs, PS_LIST_TAIL,  "-fault_count", 0,   "select by fault_count (>=)", 0);