Index: /branches/eam_branches/ipp-20101205/psphot/doc/notes.20101222.txt
===================================================================
--- /branches/eam_branches/ipp-20101205/psphot/doc/notes.20101222.txt	(revision 30160)
+++ /branches/eam_branches/ipp-20101205/psphot/doc/notes.20101222.txt	(revision 30160)
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+
+20101222 : EAM
+
+  continuing work on psphot stack.  Some notes:
+
+  * visualization now has duplicate image display calls
+  * visual needs to do a better jobs scaling the smoothed, subtracted images.
+  * the fit radius for the convolved images should be a bit bigger than the unconvolved one
+  * *** fitRadius vs apRadius ***
+    I have been using 'markVal' to define the valid pixels for different operations
+    I think this has been inconsistent.  
+
+    ** Have pmSourceMagnitudes apply the defined apRadius on the fly
+       when measuring aperture photometry
+
+    ** Set the fitRadius and keep it until redefined?
+
+    ** RadialApertures does not use the marked region?
Index: /branches/eam_branches/ipp-20101205/psphot/doc/stack.txt
===================================================================
--- /branches/eam_branches/ipp-20101205/psphot/doc/stack.txt	(revision 30159)
+++ /branches/eam_branches/ipp-20101205/psphot/doc/stack.txt	(revision 30160)
@@ -21,4 +21,6 @@
   * make sure psphotEfficiency actually subtracts the inserted fake
     sources
+
+  * XXX how does the PSF-convolved model work with changing psf models?
 
 20101207