Index: /trunk/doc/release.2015/systematics.20140411/Makefile =================================================================== --- /trunk/doc/release.2015/systematics.20140411/Makefile (revision 40303) +++ /trunk/doc/release.2015/systematics.20140411/Makefile (revision 40304) @@ -4,5 +4,5 @@ # DO_PDFLATEX = 1 -DO_BIBTEX = 0 +DO_BIBTEX = 1 help: @@ -16,4 +16,12 @@ # if you have PDF pics, they may need to be converted to EPS PDFPICS = \ +pics/dmag.pdf \ +pics/dapmag.pdf \ +pics/all_effects_r.pdf \ +pics/radial_p1_r.pdf \ +pics/radial_p2_r.pdf \ +pics/radial_p3_r.pdf + +OLD_PDFPICS = \ pics/all_effects_r.pdf \ pics/astrom_trends.pdf \ Index: /trunk/doc/release.2015/systematics.20140411/diffusion.tex =================================================================== --- /trunk/doc/release.2015/systematics.20140411/diffusion.tex (revision 40303) +++ /trunk/doc/release.2015/systematics.20140411/diffusion.tex (revision 40304) @@ -15,4 +15,11 @@ % \RequirePackage{pbox} \input{astro.sty} + +%\newcommand\oldtext[1]{\color{red}#1} +%\newcommand\newtext[1]{\textbf{\color{blue}#1}} + +\newcommand\oldtext[1]{\textbf{\color{lightgray}#1} +\newcommand\newtext[1]{\textbf{\color{blue}#1} +\newcommand\fixtext[1]{\textbf{\color{red}#1} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}% (2) specify encoding @@ -414,9 +421,9 @@ illustrate the effects in detail, but a similar set of effects are seen in many, if not all, of the GPC1 detectors with varying -strengths. First, we show the residual PSF photometry. Second, we +strengths. \fixtext{First, we show the residual PSF photometry. Second, we show the residual aperture photometry. Third, we show the astrometric residual patterns. Fourth, we show the patterns observed in the flat-field images. Finally, we show measurements derived from the -second-moments of the stars. +second-moments of the stars.} For all effects discussed below, we are measuring the mean value of @@ -509,20 +516,20 @@ \subsection{Astrometric Residuals} -% astrometry radial term -\begin{figure*}[htbp] -\begin{center} -\parbox[b]{\figwidth}{\includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/drad.\plotext}} -\hspace{\jumpleft} -\parbox[b]{\capwidth}{ -\caption{Astrometric residuals of the displacement in the radial - direction, relative to the chip coordinate -5,4960 (upper left - corner), by filter (\grizy). White boxes are GPC1 cells which have - been masked due to poor response. Superpixels representing regions - of $10\times10$ pixels are used to determine the median deviation - for measurements at the given chip pixel location compared with the - average astrometry for the given - object. } \label{fig:astrom.by.filter}} -\end{center} -\end{figure*} +%% % astrometry radial term +%% \begin{figure*}[htbp] +%% \begin{center} +%% \parbox[b]{\figwidth}{\includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/drad.\plotext}} +%% \hspace{\jumpleft} +%% \parbox[b]{\capwidth}{ +%% \caption{Astrometric residuals of the displacement in the radial +%% direction, relative to the chip coordinate -5,4960 (upper left +%% corner), by filter (\grizy). White boxes are GPC1 cells which have +%% been masked due to poor response. Superpixels representing regions +%% of $10\times10$ pixels are used to determine the median deviation +%% for measurements at the given chip pixel location compared with the +%% average astrometry for the given +%% object. } \label{fig:astrom.by.filter}} +%% \end{center} +%% \end{figure*} Figure~\ref{fig:astrom.by.filter} shows a similar type of measurement @@ -557,17 +564,17 @@ % flat-field residual -\begin{figure*}[htbp] -\begin{center} -\parbox[b]{\figwidth}{\includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/dflat.\plotext}} -\hspace{\jumpleft} -\parbox[b]{\capwidth}{ -\caption{Flat-field high-frequency structues, by filter (\grizy). - White boxes are GPC1 cells which have been masked due to poor - response. Flat-field images generated using a tunable laser have - been combined (see text); a smoothed version has been subtracted to - high-pass the response. Flat-field pixels are averaged for - $10\times10$ superpixels. } \label{fig:flats.by.filter}} -\end{center} -\end{figure*} +%% \begin{figure*}[htbp] +%% \begin{center} +%% \parbox[b]{\figwidth}{\includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/dflat.\plotext}} +%% \hspace{\jumpleft} +%% \parbox[b]{\capwidth}{ +%% \caption{Flat-field high-frequency structues, by filter (\grizy). +%% White boxes are GPC1 cells which have been masked due to poor +%% response. Flat-field images generated using a tunable laser have +%% been combined (see text); a smoothed version has been subtracted to +%% high-pass the response. Flat-field pixels are averaged for +%% $10\times10$ superpixels. } \label{fig:flats.by.filter}} +%% \end{center} +%% \end{figure*} % 2012ApJ...750...99T = Tonry et al PS1 phot system @@ -621,32 +628,32 @@ % Smear Images -\begin{figure*}[htbp] -\begin{center} -\parbox[b]{\figwidth}{\includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/smear.\plotext}} -\hspace{\jumpleft} -\parbox[b]{\capwidth}{ -\caption{Average residual smear variations, by filter (\grizy). White - boxes are GPC1 cells which have been masked due to poor response. - The residual smear ($\sigma^2_{\mbox{major}} + \sigma^2_{\mbox{minor}}$) has been - determined after the after PSF second moments have been subtracted - for each image; these values are averaged for each $10\times10$ - superpixels. } \label{fig:smear.by.filter}} -\end{center} -\end{figure*} +%% \begin{figure*}[htbp] +%% \begin{center} +%% \parbox[b]{\figwidth}{\includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/smear.\plotext}} +%% \hspace{\jumpleft} +%% \parbox[b]{\capwidth}{ +%% \caption{Average residual smear variations, by filter (\grizy). White +%% boxes are GPC1 cells which have been masked due to poor response. +%% The residual smear ($\sigma^2_{\mbox{major}} + \sigma^2_{\mbox{minor}}$) has been +%% determined after the after PSF second moments have been subtracted +%% for each image; these values are averaged for each $10\times10$ +%% superpixels. } \label{fig:smear.by.filter}} +%% \end{center} +%% \end{figure*} % Shear Images -\begin{figure*}[htbp] -\begin{center} -\parbox[b]{\figwidth}{\includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/shear.\plotext}} -\hspace{\jumpleft} -\parbox[b]{\capwidth}{ -\caption{Average residual shear variations, by filter (\grizy). White - boxes are GPC1 cells which have been masked due to poor response. - The residual shear ($\sigma^2_{\mbox{major}} - \sigma^2_{\mbox{minor}}$) has been - determined after the after PSF second moments have been subtracted - for each image; these values are averaged for each $10\times10$ - superpixels. } \label{fig:shear.by.filter}} -\end{center} -\end{figure*} +%% \begin{figure*}[htbp] +%% \begin{center} +%% \parbox[b]{\figwidth}{\includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/shear.\plotext}} +%% \hspace{\jumpleft} +%% \parbox[b]{\capwidth}{ +%% \caption{Average residual shear variations, by filter (\grizy). White +%% boxes are GPC1 cells which have been masked due to poor response. +%% The residual shear ($\sigma^2_{\mbox{major}} - \sigma^2_{\mbox{minor}}$) has been +%% determined after the after PSF second moments have been subtracted +%% for each image; these values are averaged for each $10\times10$ +%% superpixels. } \label{fig:shear.by.filter}} +%% \end{center} +%% \end{figure*} During the image analysis, the second moments are measured for all @@ -793,49 +800,49 @@ % smear trends by filter -\def\figwidth{6.5in} -\begin{figure*}[htbp] -\begin{center} -\includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/smear_trends.\plotext} -\caption{Correlation of the smear ($\sigma^2_{\mbox{major}} + - \sigma^2_{\mbox{minor}}$) signal in \gps\ with the other 4 bands: - \rps\ (upper-left), \ips\ (upper-right), \zps\ (lower-left), \yps\ (lower-right). -} \label{fig:smear.trends} -\end{center} -\end{figure*} +%% \def\figwidth{6.5in} +%% \begin{figure*}[htbp] +%% \begin{center} +%% \includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/smear_trends.\plotext} +%% \caption{Correlation of the smear ($\sigma^2_{\mbox{major}} + +%% \sigma^2_{\mbox{minor}}$) signal in \gps\ with the other 4 bands: +%% \rps\ (upper-left), \ips\ (upper-right), \zps\ (lower-left), \yps\ (lower-right). +%% } \label{fig:smear.trends} +%% \end{center} +%% \end{figure*} % psfmag trends by filter -\def\figwidth{6.5in} -\begin{figure*}[htbp] -\begin{center} -\includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/psfmag_trends.\plotext} -\caption{Correlation of the PSF magnitude residuals ($\delta m_{psf}$) - in \gps\ with the other 4 bands: \rps\ (upper-left), \ips\ - (upper-right), \zps\ (lower-left), \yps\ (lower-right). -} \label{fig:psfmag.trends} -\end{center} -\end{figure*} +%% \def\figwidth{6.5in} +%% \begin{figure*}[htbp] +%% \begin{center} +%% \includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/psfmag_trends.\plotext} +%% \caption{Correlation of the PSF magnitude residuals ($\delta m_{psf}$) +%% in \gps\ with the other 4 bands: \rps\ (upper-left), \ips\ +%% (upper-right), \zps\ (lower-left), \yps\ (lower-right). +%% } \label{fig:psfmag.trends} +%% \end{center} +%% \end{figure*} % astrom trends by filter -\def\figwidth{6.5in} -\begin{figure*}[htbp] -\begin{center} -\includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/astrom_trends.\plotext} -\caption{Correlation of the radial astrometric residual displacement ($\delta R$) - in \gps\ with the other 4 bands: \rps\ (upper-left), \ips\ - (upper-right), \zps\ (lower-left), \yps\ (lower-right). -} \label{fig:astrom.trends} -\end{center} -\end{figure*} +%% \def\figwidth{6.5in} +%% \begin{figure*}[htbp] +%% \begin{center} +%% \includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/astrom_trends.\plotext} +%% \caption{Correlation of the radial astrometric residual displacement ($\delta R$) +%% in \gps\ with the other 4 bands: \rps\ (upper-left), \ips\ +%% (upper-right), \zps\ (lower-left), \yps\ (lower-right). +%% } \label{fig:astrom.trends} +%% \end{center} +%% \end{figure*} % flat trends by filter -\def\figwidth{6.5in} -\begin{figure*}[htbp] -\begin{center} -\includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/flat_trends.\plotext} -\caption{Correlation of the flat-field tree-ring structures in \gps\ - with the other 4 bands: \rps\ (upper-left), \ips\ (upper-right), \zps\ - (lower-left), \yps\ (lower-right). } \label{fig:flat.trends} -\end{center} -\end{figure*} +%% \def\figwidth{6.5in} +%% \begin{figure*}[htbp] +%% \begin{center} +%% \includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/flat_trends.\plotext} +%% \caption{Correlation of the flat-field tree-ring structures in \gps\ +%% with the other 4 bands: \rps\ (upper-left), \ips\ (upper-right), \zps\ +%% (lower-left), \yps\ (lower-right). } \label{fig:flat.trends} +%% \end{center} +%% \end{figure*} An important question is the relationship of the tree-ring @@ -846,4 +853,43 @@ filter: the radial variations do not all follow the same patterns. Instead, we find the following relationships hold: + +% tangentially-averaged patterns vs radial position +\def\figwidth{6.5in} +\begin{figure*}[htbp] +\begin{center} +\includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/radial_p1_r.\plotext} +\caption{Correlation of the PSF magnitude residuals ($\delta m_{PSF}$) + with the smear ($\sigma^2_{\mbox{major}} + \sigma^2_{\mbox{minor}}$) + signal for \gps\ (upper-left), \rps\ (upper-right), \ips\ (lower-left), + \zps\ (lower-right). +} \label{fig:smear.vs.psfmag} +\end{center} +\end{figure*} + +% tangentially-averaged patterns vs radial position +\def\figwidth{6.5in} +\begin{figure*}[htbp] +\begin{center} +\includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/radial_p2_r.\plotext} +\caption{Correlation of the PSF magnitude residuals ($\delta m_{PSF}$) + with the smear ($\sigma^2_{\mbox{major}} + \sigma^2_{\mbox{minor}}$) + signal for \gps\ (upper-left), \rps\ (upper-right), \ips\ (lower-left), + \zps\ (lower-right). +} \label{fig:smear.vs.psfmag} +\end{center} +\end{figure*} + +% tangentially-averaged patterns vs radial position +\def\figwidth{6.5in} +\begin{figure*}[htbp] +\begin{center} +\includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/radial_p3_r.\plotext} +\caption{Correlation of the PSF magnitude residuals ($\delta m_{PSF}$) + with the smear ($\sigma^2_{\mbox{major}} + \sigma^2_{\mbox{minor}}$) + signal for \gps\ (upper-left), \rps\ (upper-right), \ips\ (lower-left), + \zps\ (lower-right). +} \label{fig:smear.vs.psfmag} +\end{center} +\end{figure*} First, the PSF magnitude residuals and the second-moment smear trends @@ -893,44 +939,44 @@ % smear vs psfmag -\def\figwidth{6.5in} -\begin{figure*}[htbp] -\begin{center} -\includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/smear_vs_psfmag.\plotext} -\caption{Correlation of the PSF magnitude residuals ($\delta m_{PSF}$) - with the smear ($\sigma^2_{\mbox{major}} + \sigma^2_{\mbox{minor}}$) - signal for \gps\ (upper-left), \rps\ (upper-right), \ips\ (lower-left), - \zps\ (lower-right). -} \label{fig:smear.vs.psfmag} -\end{center} -\end{figure*} +%% \def\figwidth{6.5in} +%% \begin{figure*}[htbp] +%% \begin{center} +%% \includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/smear_vs_psfmag.\plotext} +%% \caption{Correlation of the PSF magnitude residuals ($\delta m_{PSF}$) +%% with the smear ($\sigma^2_{\mbox{major}} + \sigma^2_{\mbox{minor}}$) +%% signal for \gps\ (upper-left), \rps\ (upper-right), \ips\ (lower-left), +%% \zps\ (lower-right). +%% } \label{fig:smear.vs.psfmag} +%% \end{center} +%% \end{figure*} % dsmear vs astrom -\def\figwidth{6.5in} -\begin{figure*}[htbp] -\begin{center} -\includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/dsmear_vs_astrom.\plotext} -\caption{ -Correlation of the radial astrometric residual displacement ($\delta -R$) with the derivative of the smear ($\partial -\sigma^2_{\mbox{major}} + \sigma^2_{\mbox{minor}}$) signal with -respect to the radial postion for \gps\ (upper-left), \rps\ -(upper-right), \ips\ (lower-left), \zps\ (lower-right). -} \label{fig:dsmear.vs.astrom} -\end{center} -\end{figure*} +%% \def\figwidth{6.5in} +%% \begin{figure*}[htbp] +%% \begin{center} +%% \includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/dsmear_vs_astrom.\plotext} +%% \caption{ +%% Correlation of the radial astrometric residual displacement ($\delta +%% R$) with the derivative of the smear ($\partial +%% \sigma^2_{\mbox{major}} + \sigma^2_{\mbox{minor}}$) signal with +%% respect to the radial postion for \gps\ (upper-left), \rps\ +%% (upper-right), \ips\ (lower-left), \zps\ (lower-right). +%% } \label{fig:dsmear.vs.astrom} +%% \end{center} +%% \end{figure*} % dastrom vs flat -\def\figwidth{6.5in} -\begin{figure*}[htbp] -\begin{center} -\includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/dastrom_vs_flat.\plotext} -\caption{ -Correlation of the derivative of the radial astrometric residual -displacement ($\delta R$) with respect to the radial position with the -flat-field tree-ring signal for \gps\ (upper-left), \rps\ (upper-right), -\ips\ (lower-left), \zps\ (lower-right). -} \label{fig:dastrom.vs.flat} -\end{center} -\end{figure*} +%% \def\figwidth{6.5in} +%% \begin{figure*}[htbp] +%% \begin{center} +%% \includegraphics[width=\figwidth]{\picdir/dastrom_vs_flat.\plotext} +%% \caption{ +%% Correlation of the derivative of the radial astrometric residual +%% displacement ($\delta R$) with respect to the radial position with the +%% flat-field tree-ring signal for \gps\ (upper-left), \rps\ (upper-right), +%% \ips\ (lower-left), \zps\ (lower-right). +%% } \label{fig:dastrom.vs.flat} +%% \end{center} +%% \end{figure*} \section{Discussion} @@ -1166,6 +1212,6 @@ \bibliographystyle{apj} -%\bibliography{lib}{} -\input{diffusion.bbl} +\bibliography{lib}{} +%\input{diffusion.bbl} \end{document}