Index: trunk/doc/release.2015/systematics.20140411/response.v1.tex
===================================================================
--- trunk/doc/release.2015/systematics.20140411/response.v1.tex	(revision 40306)
+++ trunk/doc/release.2015/systematics.20140411/response.v1.tex	(revision 40307)
@@ -2,4 +2,19 @@
 \begin{document}
 \letterhead
+
+We thank the referee for the careful and thoughtful examination of our
+article.  We particularly appreciate the suggestion to reduce the
+number of figures and remove those that are superfluous.  We have
+removed the various scatter plots and replaced them with plots of the
+radial run of the important effects, along with two plots showing the
+radial run of the derivative of the smear compared with the
+astrometric residuals and the derivative of the astrometric residuals
+compared with the flat-field features.  We have also removed the
+5-filter panels for the astrometric, flat-field, smear, and shear
+effects.  We instead adjust the discussion to focus on the single
+figure with all 6 effects shown for r-band.  We have adjusted the
+wording to account for the change in the figures.
+
+Below are our point-by-point responses to the {\tt referee's suggestions}.
 
 \begin{verbatim}