Index: /trunk/doc/release.2015/ps1.analysis/analysis.tex =================================================================== --- /trunk/doc/release.2015/ps1.analysis/analysis.tex (revision 40599) +++ /trunk/doc/release.2015/ps1.analysis/analysis.tex (revision 40600) @@ -104,5 +104,6 @@ \keywords{Surveys:\PSONE } -\section{INTRODUCTION}\label{sec:intro} +\section{Introduction} +\label{sec:intro} % \begin{verbatim} @@ -115,4 +116,6 @@ % * real example of oversubtracted galaxy % \end{verbatim} + +\note{define psfQF, psfQFperfect} The 1.8m Pan-STARRS\,1 telescope is located on the summit of Haleakala @@ -177,5 +180,5 @@ %The Pan-STARRS\,1 Surveys \citet[][Paper I]{chambers2017} -provides an overview of the Pan-STARRS System, the design and +provide an overview of the Pan-STARRS System, the design and execution of the Surveys, the resulting image and catalog data products, a discussion of the overall data quality and basic @@ -185,5 +188,5 @@ %Pan-STARRS Data Processing Stages \citet[][Paper II]{magnier2017.datasystem} -describes how the various data processing stages are organized and implemented +describe how the various data processing stages are organized and implemented in the Imaging Processing Pipeline (IPP), including details of the the processing database which is a critical element in the IPP infrastructure . @@ -191,6 +194,8 @@ %Waters et al. 2017 (Paper III) %Pan-STARRS Pixel Processing : Detrending, Warping, Stacking -\citet[][Paper III]{waters2017} -describes the details of the pixel processing algorithms, including detrending, warping, and adding (to create stacked images) and subtracting (to create difference images) and resulting image products and their properties. +\citet[][Paper III]{waters2017} describe the details of the pixel +processing algorithms, including detrending, warping, and adding (to +create stacked images) and subtracting (to create difference images) +and resulting image products and their properties. @@ -198,10 +203,10 @@ %Pan-STARRS Pixel Analysis : Source Detection %\citet[][Paper IV]{magnier2017.analysis} -%describes the details of the source detection and photometry, including point-spread-function and extended source fitting models, and the techniques for ``forced" photometry measurements. +%describe the details of the source detection and photometry, including point-spread-function and extended source fitting models, and the techniques for ``forced" photometry measurements. %Magnier et al. 2017 (Paper V) %Pan-STARRS Photometric and Astrometric Calibration \citet[][Paper V]{magnier2017.calibration} -describes the final calibration process, and the resulting photometric and astrometric quality. +describe the final calibration process, and the resulting photometric and astrometric quality. @@ -209,14 +214,11 @@ %Pan-STARRS 1 Database and Data Products \citet[][Paper VI]{flewelling2017} -describes the details of the resulting catalog data and its organization in the Pan-STARRS database. -% -% -\citet[][Paper VII]{huber2017} +describe the details of the resulting catalog data and its organization in the Pan-STARRS database. + %Huber et al. 2017 (Paper VII) -describes the Medium Deep Survey in detail, including the unique issues and data products specific to that survey. The Medium Deep Survey is not part of Data Release 1. (DR1) - -% -The Pan-STARRS1 filters and photometric system have already been -described in detail in \cite{2012ApJ...750...99T}. +\citet[][Paper VII]{huber2017} describe the Medium Deep Survey in +detail, including the unique issues and data products specific to that +survey. The Medium Deep Survey is not part of Data Releases 1 or 2 and +will be made available in a future data release. %%{\color{red} {\em Note: These papers are being placed on arXiv.org to @@ -562,31 +564,32 @@ \begin{table*} \begin{center} +\footnotesize \caption{\label{tab:mask_values} \nocode{psphot} / GPC1 Mask Image Pixel Values} % \vspace{-0.5cm} -\begin{tabular}{lcl} +\begin{tabular}{lcccl} \hline \hline -{\bf Mask Name} & {\bf Mask Value} & {\bf Description} \\ +{\bf Mask Name} & {\bf Mask Value} & {\bf Dynamic?} & {\bf Suspect?} & {\bf Description} \\ \hline - DETECTOR & 0x0001 & A detector defect is present. \\ - FLAT & 0x0002 & The flat field model does not calibrate the pixel reliably. \\ - DARK & 0x0004 & The dark model does not calibrate the pixel reliably. \\ - BLANK & 0x0008 & The pixel does not contain valid data. \\ - CTE & 0x0010 & The pixel has poor charge transfer efficiency. \\ - SAT & 0x0020 & The pixel is saturated. \\ - LOW & 0x0040 & The pixel has a lower value than expected. \\ - SUSPECT & 0x0080 & The pixel is suspected of being bad$^1$. \\ - BURNTOOL & 0x0080 & The pixel contain an burntool repaired streak. \\ - CR & 0x0100 & A cosmic ray is present. \\ - SPIKE & 0x0200 & A diffraction spike is present. \\ - GHOST & 0x0400 & An optical ghost is present. \\ - STREAK & 0x0800 & A streak is present. \\ - STARCORE & 0x1000 & A bright star core is present. \\ - CONV.BAD & 0x2000 & The pixel is bad after convolution with a bad pixel. \\ - CONV.POOR& 0x4000 & The pixel is poor after convolution with a bad pixel. \\ - MARK & 0x8000 & An internal flag for temporarily marking a pixel. \\ + DETECTOR & 0x0001 & N & N & A detector defect is present. \\ + FLAT & 0x0002 & N & N & The flat field model does not calibrate the pixel reliably. \\ + DARK & 0x0004 & N & N & The dark model does not calibrate the pixel reliably. \\ + BLANK & 0x0008 & N & N & The pixel does not contain valid data. \\ + CTE & 0x0010 & N & N & The pixel has poor charge transfer efficiency. \\ + SAT & 0x0020 & Y & N & The pixel is saturated. \\ + LOW & 0x0040 & Y & N & The pixel has a lower value than expected. \\ + SUSPECT & 0x0080 & Y & Y & The pixel is suspected of being bad$^1$. \\ + BURNTOOL & 0x0080 & Y & Y & The pixel contain an burntool repaired streak. \\ + CR & 0x0100 & Y & N & A cosmic ray is present. \\ + SPIKE & 0x0200 & Y & Y & A diffraction spike is present. \\ + GHOST & 0x0400 & Y & Y & An optical ghost is present. \\ + STREAK & 0x0800 & Y & Y & A streak is present. \\ + STARCORE & 0x1000 & Y & Y & A bright star core is present. \\ + CONV.BAD & 0x2000 & Y & N & The pixel is bad after convolution with a bad pixel. \\ + CONV.POOR& 0x4000 & Y & Y & The pixel is poor after convolution with a bad pixel. \\ + MARK & 0x8000 & X & X & An internal flag for temporarily marking a pixel. \\ \hline -\multicolumn{3}{l}{$^1$ The SUSPECT bit is generic and only +\multicolumn{5}{l}{$^1$ The SUSPECT bit is generic and only used if a specific reason cannot be identified.}\\ -\multicolumn{3}{l}{It is overloaded on the same bit as BURNTOOL.}\\ +\multicolumn{5}{l}{~~~It is overloaded on the same bit as BURNTOOL.}\\ \end{tabular} \end{center}