= Summary of ppStack_testing_201111 ---IN PROGRESS PLEASE DO NOT EDIT--- = [[PageOutline]] Discovered for many inputs into ppStack (i.e., deep and even refstacks), that the PSF in the output convolved stack grows with the number of inputs beyond the initial target PSF. Had been missed due to convolved stacks really only being used for magic, but was noticed with some M31 analysis and deepstacks of MD04. '''add examples''' [[Image(MD04.conv.unconv.png,300px)]] Other issues: * hard limit on number of inputs (solved: descrip to watch for) * heavy RAM use * change the target PSF FWHM selected Branch for testing (currently r32161 from last summer -- '''need to update..''') -- http://svn.pan-starrs.ifa.hawaii.edu/trac/ipp/browser/branches/meh_branches/ppstack_test * many outputs turned on (runs slower, makes many many files) * ppStackMatch.c -- need add a TESTING2 for reading in already processed conv images.. * ppSubMatchPSFs.c has TESTING but not ifdef at start, is a .DEBUG. used to trigger? = Test Sets = More easily setup than for testing ppSub, need a large number of a variety of inputs and some number of similar inputs. == MD04 == Sample of 20 and 100 drawn from the the [wiki:MD.GR0#MD04.V3deepstack MD04.V3 GR0 deepstack] set. * FWHM in stack logs.. add how compare to psphot? ''' need to add histogram of both actual inputs''' [[Image(MD04.i.00000.deep.expfwhm.png,300px)]] Batch scripts for running in /data/ipp059.0/mhuber/testppstack_deep201111/MDdeeptest == Sim == A small variety set of many groups for 20 and 100 inputs. Also sample of two similar inputs using the _000 and _001 images. Simtest setup: * pixelscale 0.258"/pixel? || '''filename''' || '''sim FWHM''' || '''FWHM_MAJ (pixel)''' || '''IQ_FW1 (pixel)''' || || || || || || || image.0 || 1.0 || 3.82 || 2.98 || || image.1 || 1.1 || 4.19 || 3.28 || || image.2 || 1.2 || 4.58 || 3.62 || || image.3 || 1.5 || 5.69 || 4.49 || || _and repeat_ || || || || || || || || || Batch scripts for running in various /data/ipp059.0/mhuber/testppstack_deep201111/ppstack_simdeep* ('''needs cleanup''') = Tests = * do clean simulated images suffer the same problem? * can use for more detailed testing since faster to run than MD04 skycell and not particular to GPC1 data * how is it related to the range of inputs and number * is 20 inputs enough to reveal problem, if 100 then will be tedious * what are the output convolved images being stacked, what is the target the images are being convolved to * need to understand what the code does, so first test is to look at each output, add others and step through the code... == Sim == === 20 input case: 4 groups === || '''filename''' || '''sim FWHM''' || '''sim FWHM_MAJ''' || '''log Input FWHM (pixel)''' || '''log kron (pixel)''' || conv FWHM || conv IQ_FW1 || || || || || || || || _000 || 1.0 || || 3.82(1) || 1.99/92,88/78,05/05,91/81 || || _001 || 1.1 || || 4.19(1) || 2.19/09 || || _002 || 1.2 || || 4.58(1) || 2.55/48 || || _003 || 1.5 || || 5.69(1) || 3.11/00 || || || || || || || * * input FWHM 4.57+/-0.72 (ave?) * target seeing FWHM: 5.70 -- set by worst input, kron ~3.1 * some wildly varying kron values || '''filename''' || '''FWHM_MAJ (pixel)''' || '''IQ_FW1 (pixel)''' || || || || || || real_000 || 3.88 || 3.00 || || real_003 || 5.82 || 4.54 || || fake_000 || 5.10 || 3.69 || || fake_003 || 5.04 || 3.68 || || conv.1 || 6.51 || 5.10 || || conv.3 || 6.60 || 5.19 || || comb.initial || 6.57 || 5.58 || || stack || 6.57 || 5.41 || || || || || === 20 input case w/ similar inputs: 10 groups === || '''filename''' || '''sim FWHM''' || '''sim FWHM_MAJ''' || '''log Input FWHM (pixel)''' || '''log kron (pixel)''' || || || || || || || || _000 || 1.0 || 3.87(2) || 3.88(1) || 2.1(1) || || _001 || 1.1 || 4.25(1) || 4.26(1) || 2.28(4) || * * input FWHM 4.07+/-0.19 (ave) * target seeing FWHM: 4.28 -- set by worst input, kron ~2.26 * some wildly varying kron values || '''filename''' || '''FWHM_MAJ (pixel)''' || '''IQ_FW1 (pixel)''' || || || || || || real_000 || 3.87 || 3.00 || || real_001 || 4.24 || 3.32 || || fake_000 || 4.27 || 3.22 || || fake_001 || 4.27 || 3.21 || || conv.1 || 4.49 || 3.52 || || conv.1 || 4.56 || 3.58 || || comb.initial || 4.54 || 3.77 || || stack || 5.37 || 4.36 || || || || || * odd final stack is ~20% larger than conv and initial stack -- need to check === 100 input case: 25 groups ===