Changeset 40600

Timestamp:

Jan 9, 2019, 4:35:54 PM (8 years ago)

Author:

eugene

Message:

note dynamic vs static bits

File:

• trunk/doc/release.2015/ps1.analysis/analysis.tex (modified) (8 diffs)

trunk/doc/release.2015/ps1.analysis/analysis.tex

@@ -104 +104 @@
 \keywords{Surveys:\PSONE }
 
-\section{INTRODUCTION}\label{sec:intro}
+\section{Introduction}
+\label{sec:intro}
 
 % \begin{verbatim}
@@ -115 +116 @@
 %   * real example of oversubtracted galaxy
 % \end{verbatim}
+
+\note{define psfQF, psfQFperfect}
 
 The 1.8m Pan-STARRS\,1 telescope is located on the summit of Haleakala
@@ -177 +180 @@
 %The Pan-STARRS\,1 Surveys
 \citet[][Paper I]{chambers2017}
-provides an overview of the Pan-STARRS System, the design and
+provide an overview of the Pan-STARRS System, the design and
 execution of the Surveys, the resulting image and catalog data
 products, a discussion of the overall data quality and basic
@@ -185 +188 @@
 %Pan-STARRS Data Processing Stages
 \citet[][Paper II]{magnier2017.datasystem}
-describes how the various data processing stages are organized and implemented
+describe how the various data processing stages are organized and implemented
 in the Imaging Processing Pipeline (IPP), including details of the 
 the processing database which is a critical element in the IPP infrastructure . 
@@ -191 +194 @@
 %Waters et al. 2017 (Paper III) 
 %Pan-STARRS Pixel Processing : Detrending, Warping, Stacking
-\citet[][Paper III]{waters2017}
-describes the details of the pixel processing algorithms, including detrending, warping, and adding (to create stacked images) and subtracting (to create difference images) and resulting image products and their properties. 
+\citet[][Paper III]{waters2017} describe the details of the pixel
+processing algorithms, including detrending, warping, and adding (to
+create stacked images) and subtracting (to create difference images)
+and resulting image products and their properties.
 
 
@@ -198 +203 @@
 %Pan-STARRS Pixel Analysis : Source Detection 
 %\citet[][Paper IV]{magnier2017.analysis}
-%describes the details of the source detection and photometry, including point-spread-function and extended source fitting models, and the techniques for ``forced" photometry measurements. 
+%describe the details of the source detection and photometry, including point-spread-function and extended source fitting models, and the techniques for ``forced" photometry measurements. 
 
 %Magnier et al. 2017 (Paper V) 
 %Pan-STARRS Photometric and Astrometric Calibration
 \citet[][Paper V]{magnier2017.calibration}
-describes the final calibration process, and the resulting photometric and astrometric quality.  
+describe the final calibration process, and the resulting photometric and astrometric quality.  
 
 
@@ -209 +214 @@
 %Pan-STARRS 1 Database and Data Products
 \citet[][Paper VI]{flewelling2017}
-describes  the details of the resulting catalog data and its organization in the Pan-STARRS database. 
-%
-%
-\citet[][Paper VII]{huber2017}
+describe  the details of the resulting catalog data and its organization in the Pan-STARRS database. 
+
 %Huber et al. 2017 (Paper VII)
-describes the Medium Deep Survey in detail, including the unique issues and data products specific to that survey. The Medium Deep Survey is not part of Data Release 1. (DR1) 
-
-%
-The Pan-STARRS1 filters and photometric system have already been
-described in detail in \cite{2012ApJ...750...99T}.
+\citet[][Paper VII]{huber2017} describe the Medium Deep Survey in
+detail, including the unique issues and data products specific to that
+survey. The Medium Deep Survey is not part of Data Releases 1 or 2 and
+will be made available in a future data release.
 
 %%{\color{red} {\em Note: These papers are being placed on arXiv.org to
@@ -562 +564 @@
 \begin{table*}
 \begin{center}
+\footnotesize
 \caption{\label{tab:mask_values} \nocode{psphot} / GPC1 Mask Image Pixel Values} % \vspace{-0.5cm}
-\begin{tabular}{lcl}
+\begin{tabular}{lcccl}
 \hline
 \hline
-{\bf Mask Name} & {\bf Mask Value} & {\bf Description} \\
+{\bf Mask Name} & {\bf Mask Value} & {\bf Dynamic?} & {\bf Suspect?} & {\bf Description} \\
 \hline
-  DETECTOR & 0x0001 & A detector defect is present. \\
-  FLAT     & 0x0002 & The flat field model does not calibrate the pixel reliably. \\
-  DARK     & 0x0004 & The dark model does not calibrate the pixel reliably. \\
-  BLANK    & 0x0008 & The pixel does not contain valid data. \\
-  CTE      & 0x0010 & The pixel has poor charge transfer efficiency. \\
-  SAT      & 0x0020 & The pixel is saturated. \\
-  LOW      & 0x0040 & The pixel has a lower value than expected. \\
-  SUSPECT  & 0x0080 & The pixel is suspected of being bad$^1$. \\
-  BURNTOOL & 0x0080 & The pixel contain an burntool repaired streak. \\
-  CR       & 0x0100 & A cosmic ray is present. \\
-  SPIKE    & 0x0200 & A diffraction spike is present. \\
-  GHOST    & 0x0400 & An optical ghost is present. \\
-  STREAK   & 0x0800 & A streak is present. \\
-  STARCORE & 0x1000 & A bright star core is present. \\
-  CONV.BAD & 0x2000 & The pixel is bad after convolution with a bad pixel. \\
-  CONV.POOR& 0x4000 & The pixel is poor after convolution with a bad pixel. \\
-  MARK     & 0x8000 & An internal flag for temporarily marking a pixel. \\
+  DETECTOR & 0x0001 & N & N & A detector defect is present. \\
+  FLAT     & 0x0002 & N & N & The flat field model does not calibrate the pixel reliably. \\
+  DARK     & 0x0004 & N & N & The dark model does not calibrate the pixel reliably. \\
+  BLANK    & 0x0008 & N & N & The pixel does not contain valid data. \\
+  CTE      & 0x0010 & N & N & The pixel has poor charge transfer efficiency. \\
+  SAT      & 0x0020 & Y & N & The pixel is saturated. \\
+  LOW      & 0x0040 & Y & N & The pixel has a lower value than expected. \\
+  SUSPECT  & 0x0080 & Y & Y & The pixel is suspected of being bad$^1$. \\
+  BURNTOOL & 0x0080 & Y & Y & The pixel contain an burntool repaired streak. \\
+  CR       & 0x0100 & Y & N & A cosmic ray is present. \\
+  SPIKE    & 0x0200 & Y & Y & A diffraction spike is present. \\
+  GHOST    & 0x0400 & Y & Y & An optical ghost is present. \\
+  STREAK   & 0x0800 & Y & Y & A streak is present. \\
+  STARCORE & 0x1000 & Y & Y & A bright star core is present. \\
+  CONV.BAD & 0x2000 & Y & N & The pixel is bad after convolution with a bad pixel. \\
+  CONV.POOR& 0x4000 & Y & Y & The pixel is poor after convolution with a bad pixel. \\
+  MARK     & 0x8000 & X & X & An internal flag for temporarily marking a pixel. \\
 \hline
-\multicolumn{3}{l}{$^1$ The SUSPECT bit is generic and only
+\multicolumn{5}{l}{$^1$ The SUSPECT bit is generic and only
   used if a specific reason cannot be identified.}\\
-\multicolumn{3}{l}{It is overloaded on the same bit as BURNTOOL.}\\
+\multicolumn{5}{l}{~~~It is overloaded on the same bit as BURNTOOL.}\\
 \end{tabular}
 \end{center}