- Timestamp:
- May 7, 2019, 8:19:58 PM (7 years ago)
- Location:
- trunk/doc/release.2015/ps1.detrend
- Files:
-
- 4 added
- 3 edited
-
Makefile (modified) (1 diff)
-
detrend.bbl (modified) (2 diffs)
-
detrend.tex (modified) (8 diffs)
-
images/correlated.noise.png (added)
-
images/correlated.noise_sm.png (added)
-
images/persistent_charge.png (added)
-
images/persistent_charge_sm.png (added)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
trunk/doc/release.2015/ps1.detrend/Makefile
r40616 r40718 2 2 3 3 DO_PDFLATEX = 1 4 DO_BIBTEX = 04 DO_BIBTEX = 1 5 5 6 6 help: -
trunk/doc/release.2015/ps1.detrend/detrend.bbl
r40616 r40718 1 \begin{thebibliography}{ 19}1 \begin{thebibliography}{20} 2 2 \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi 3 3 … … 112 112 \apj, 756, 158 113 113 114 \bibitem[{{Swaters} \& {Valdes}(2007)}]{2007ASPC..376..269S} 115 {Swaters}, R.~A. \& {Valdes}, F.~G. 2007, in Astronomical Society of the 116 Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 376, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and 117 Systems XVI, ed. R.~A. {Shaw}, F.~{Hill}, \& D.~J. {Bell}, 269 118 114 119 \bibitem[{{Tonry} \& {Onaka}(2009)}]{2009amos.confE..40T} 115 120 {Tonry}, J. \& {Onaka}, P. 2009, in Advanced Maui Optical and Space -
trunk/doc/release.2015/ps1.detrend/detrend.tex
r40710 r40718 1057 1057 \begin{figure*}[htpb] 1058 1058 \centering 1059 % \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize,angle=0,clip]{images/full_fpa_ghosts.jpg}1060 % \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize,angle=0,clip]{images/full_fpa_ghosts_sm.png}1061 1059 \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize,angle=0,clip]{images/GPC1_Ghosts_with_Zoom.png} 1062 1060 \caption{{\bf Ghosts:} Example of optical ghosts in GPC1. The … … 1075 1073 \begin{figure*}[htpb] 1076 1074 \centering 1077 % \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize,angle=0,clip]{images/glint_example_o5379g0103o.jpg}1078 1075 \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize,angle=0,clip]{images/full_fpa_glints_sm.png} 1079 1076 \caption{{\bf Glints:} Example of a glint on exposure o5379g0103o (2010-07-02, 45s \ips{} filter). The source star out of the field of view creates a long reflection that extends through OTA73 and OTA63.} … … 1328 1325 minutes. 1329 1326 1327 %% \begin{figure}[htpb] 1328 %% \centering 1329 %% \begin{minipage}{0.45\hsize} 1330 %% \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize,angle=0,clip]{images/o5677g0123o_nbt_XY11.png} 1331 %% \end{minipage}% 1332 %% \begin{minipage}{0.45\hsize} 1333 %% \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize,angle=0,clip]{images/o5677g0124o_nbt_XY11.png} 1334 %% \end{minipage} 1335 %% \begin{minipage}{0.45\hsize} 1336 %% \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize,angle=0,clip]{images/o5677g0123o_wbt_XY11.png} 1337 %% \end{minipage}% 1338 %% \begin{minipage}{0.45\hsize} 1339 %% \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize,angle=0,clip]{images/o5677g0124o_wbt_XY11.png} 1340 %% \end{minipage} 1341 %% \caption{{\bf Persistent Charge:} Example of OTA11 cell xy50 on exposures o5677g0123o (left) and o5677g0124o (right). The top panels show the image with all appropriate detrending steps, but without burntool, and the bottom show the same with burntool applied. There is some slight over subtraction in fitting the initial trail, but the impact of the trail is greatly reduced in both exposures.} 1342 %% \label{fig:burntool images} 1343 %% \end{figure} 1344 1330 1345 \begin{figure}[htpb] 1331 1346 \centering 1332 \begin{minipage}{0.45\hsize} 1333 \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize,angle=0,clip]{images/o5677g0123o_nbt_XY11.png} 1334 \end{minipage}% 1335 \begin{minipage}{0.45\hsize} 1336 \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize,angle=0,clip]{images/o5677g0124o_nbt_XY11.png} 1337 \end{minipage} 1338 \begin{minipage}{0.45\hsize} 1339 \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize,angle=0,clip]{images/o5677g0123o_wbt_XY11.png} 1340 \end{minipage}% 1341 \begin{minipage}{0.45\hsize} 1342 \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize,angle=0,clip]{images/o5677g0124o_wbt_XY11.png} 1343 \end{minipage} 1347 \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize,angle=0,clip]{images/persistent_charge.png} 1344 1348 \caption{{\bf Persistent Charge:} Example of OTA11 cell xy50 on exposures o5677g0123o (left) and o5677g0124o (right). The top panels show the image with all appropriate detrending steps, but without burntool, and the bottom show the same with burntool applied. There is some slight over subtraction in fitting the initial trail, but the impact of the trail is greatly reduced in both exposures.} 1345 1349 \label{fig:burntool images} … … 1478 1482 \label{tab:pattern_row_cells} 1479 1483 \end{deluxetable} 1480 1481 % this figure does not really clarify anything1482 % \begin{figure}[htpb]1483 % \centering1484 % \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize,angle=0,clip]{images/linearity_XY27_xy16.png}1485 % \caption{Example of the linearity correction as a fraction of observed flux for OTA27, cell xy16.}1486 % \label{fig: nonlinearity}1487 % \end{figure}1488 1484 1489 1485 \subsection{Pattern correction} … … 1565 1561 shows an example of a cell pre- and post-correction. 1566 1562 1563 %% \begin{minipage}{0.45\hsize} 1564 %% \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize,angle=0,clip]{images/o5379g0103o_npt_XY57_sm.png} 1565 %% \end{minipage}% 1566 %% \begin{minipage}{0.45\hsize} 1567 %% \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize,angle=0,clip]{images/o5379g0103o_wpt_XY57_sm.png} 1568 %% \end{minipage} 1569 1567 1570 \begin{figure*}[htpb] 1568 1571 \centering 1569 \begin{minipage}{0.45\hsize} 1570 \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize,angle=0,clip]{images/o5379g0103o_npt_XY57_sm.png} 1571 \end{minipage}% 1572 \begin{minipage}{0.45\hsize} 1573 \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize,angle=0,clip]{images/o5379g0103o_wpt_XY57_sm.png} 1574 \end{minipage} 1572 \includegraphics[width=0.9\hsize,angle=0,clip]{images/{correlated.noise}.png} 1575 1573 \caption{{\bf Correlated Noise:} Example of the 1576 1574 \nocode{PATTERN.ROW} correction on exposure o5379g0103o OTA57 … … 1866 1864 \label{sec:warping} 1867 1865 1866 In order to perform image combination operations (stacking and 1867 differences), the individual OTA images are geometrically transformed 1868 to a set of images with a consistent and uniform relationship between 1869 sky coordinates and image pixels. This warping operation transforms 1870 the image pixels from the regular grid laid out on the chips in the 1871 camera to a system of pixels with consistent geometry for a location 1872 on the sky. 1873 1874 The new image coordinate system is defined by one of a number of 1875 ``tessellations'' which specify how the sky is divided into individual 1876 images. A single tessellation starts with a collection of projection 1877 centers distributed across the sky. A grid of image pixels about each 1878 projection center corresponds to sky positions via a projection with a 1879 specified pixel scale and rotation. In general, the pixel grid within 1880 the projection is defined as a simplified grid with the y-axis aligned 1881 to the Declination lines and no distortion terms. The projection 1882 centers are typically separated by several degrees on the sky; for 1883 pixel scales appropriate to GPC1, the resulting collection of pixels 1884 would be unwieldy in terms of memory in the processing computer. The 1885 pixel grid is thus subdivided into smaller sub-images called 1886 'skycells'. 1887 1868 1888 \begin{figure}[htpb] 1869 1889 \centering … … 1911 1931 } 1912 1932 \end{figure} 1913 1914 In order to perform image combination operations (stacking and1915 differences), the individual OTA images are geometrically transformed1916 to a set of images with a consistent and uniform relationship between1917 sky coordinates and image pixels. This warping operation transforms1918 the image pixels from the regular grid laid out on the chips in the1919 camera to a system of pixels with consistent geometry for a location1920 on the sky.1921 1922 The new image coordinate system is defined by one of a number of1923 ``tessellations'' which specify how the sky is divided into individual1924 images. A single tessellation starts with a collection of projection1925 centers distributed across the sky. A grid of image pixels about each1926 projection center corresponds to sky positions via a projection with a1927 specified pixel scale and rotation. In general, the pixel grid within1928 the projection is defined as a simplified grid with the y-axis aligned1929 to the Declination lines and no distortion terms. The projection1930 centers are typically separated by several degrees on the sky; for1931 pixel scales appropriate to GPC1, the resulting collection of pixels1932 would be unwieldy in terms of memory in the processing computer. The1933 pixel grid is thus subdivided into smaller sub-images called1934 'skycells'.1935 1933 1936 1934 A tessellation can be defined for a limited region, with only a small … … 2543 2541 2544 2542 \bibliographystyle{apj} 2545 %\bibliography{lib}{}2546 \input{detrend.bbl}2543 \bibliography{lib}{} 2544 % \input{detrend.bbl} 2547 2545 2548 2546 \end{document}
Note:
See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.
