- Timestamp:
- Nov 29, 2019, 10:18:52 AM (7 years ago)
- File:
-
- 1 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
trunk/doc/release.2015/ps1.calibration/calibration.tex
r41179 r41180 1089 1089 rejections do not catch all cases of bad measurements. 1090 1090 1091 \note{justify this outlier rejection process} 1091 1092 After the initial iterations, we also perform outlier rejections based 1092 1093 on the consistency of the measurements. For each star, we use a two … … 1114 1115 calibrated based on their overlaps with other images. 1115 1116 1117 \note{justify the choice of a factor of 10} 1116 1118 We overweight the ubercal measurements in order to tie the relative 1117 1119 photometry system to the ubercal zero points. Ubercal images and … … 1362 1364 average photometry given the possible presence of non-Gaussian 1363 1365 outliers even within the best subset of measurements. 1366 1367 \note{include a reference to IRLS and describe concept more} 1368 \code{http://users.stat.umn.edu/~sandy/courses/8053/handouts/robust.pdf} 1369 \code{https://arxiv.org/pdf/0807.0575.pdf} 1364 1370 1365 1371 \subsubsection{Selection of Measurements}
Note:
See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.
