| 138 | | === Experiment 15 === |
| 139 | | Same parameters as 14, i.e. (14, 200, 10, ['''10''', 5, 19, 150, 10000]) but started immediately after 14 completed. |
| | 138 | === Experiment 15 === |
| | 139 | Same parameters as 14, i.e. (15, 200, 10, [10, 5, 19, 150, 10000]) but started immediately after 14 completed. |
| 141 | | Exp. 15: 4 busy, 19 segfaults, 1 busy, 15 segfaults, 1 busy, 14 segfaults. |
| | 141 | 4 busy, 19 segfaults, 1 busy, 15 segfaults, 1 busy, 14 segfaults. |
| | 142 | |
| | 143 | No real improvement regarding exp XX |
| | 144 | |
| | 145 | === Experiment 16 === |
| | 146 | Lowered the processes number from 200 to 150 (16, '''150''', 10, [10, 5, 19, 150, 10000]) |
| | 147 | |
| | 148 | No busy, no segfaults (was run 10 minutes after exp. 15). |
| | 149 | |
| | 150 | === Experiment 17 === |
| | 151 | Same parameters as 16 (17, 150, 10, [10, 5, 19, 150, 10000]). Run shortly after 16. |
| | 152 | |
| | 153 | 4 busy, no segfaults. |
| | 154 | |
| | 155 | === Experiment 18 === |
| | 156 | Same parameters as 16 and 17 (18, 150, 10, [10, 5, 19, 150, 10000]). Run immediately after 17. |
| | 157 | 2 busy, no segfaults. |
| | 158 | |
| | 159 | '''''Conclusion''''' Raising the number of starting servers apparently prevents segfaulting. |
| | 160 | |
| | 161 | === Experiment 19 === |