| | 1 | = DR1 Paper notes = |
| | 2 | |
| | 3 | This is intended to be a dumping ground of style guides and comments that apply to all of the IPP DR1 papers. Please add more details. |
| | 4 | |
| | 5 | == font choices == |
| | 6 | |
| | 7 | We each choose different ways to talk about different stages of processing and other IPP things, we should be homogeneous. HAF is definitely the worst at this. Chris has a style file for this. |
| | 8 | |
| | 9 | * ipp stages should be in the funny uppercase font (add in details) |
| | 10 | |
| | 11 | * actual names of programs (burntool, addstar, etc) should be teletype |
| | 12 | |
| | 13 | * ipptopsps, IPP-TO-PSPS, IppToPsps, etc. needs to be the same as ipp stages |
| | 14 | |
| | 15 | * dvo DVO ?? when we talk about the dvo database, how should we style it? |
| | 16 | |
| | 17 | * HAF uses italics for tables and teletype for column names (for PSPS tables/columns) |
| | 18 | |
| | 19 | * how to style columns/ tables in gpc1/nebulous/etc databases? |
| | 20 | |
| | 21 | == gaia == |
| | 22 | |
| | 23 | We should acknowledge and reference gaia if we mention it in the paper |
| | 24 | |
| | 25 | == email == |
| | 26 | |
| | 27 | We should have our email on the paper to make it easy to get comments |
| | 28 | |
| | 29 | == astroph == |
| | 30 | |
| | 31 | we should homogenize how we are listed in astroph. I like Chris's line on astroph, I think we should all do that: |
| | 32 | |
| | 33 | {{{Paper III of Pan-STARRs DR1 public data release documentation}}} |
| | 34 | |
