| Version 1 (modified by , 15 years ago) ( diff ) |
|---|
Second Microtest Set
This data set consisted of two exposures taken with the default voltages, one with the microtest 05 voltages (SW_L = default - 1.0 V, SW_H = default - 1.0 V), and six others that vary only SW_L or SW_H (with the other set to the default value). To study the impact of these changes, I reduced the data as before, and found the best fit lines in the dx and dy offsets as a function of instrumental magnitudes. The data were binned using 0.1 magnitude bins, and the fit performed between -14 and -12 (other fits were performed using ranges (-16:-14) and (-12:-10), but are not shown here).
The following images show the best fit slopes as a function of voltage in both dx and dy directions, with the dy data providing a control. These show convincingly that SW_L has little effect on the slope within this range, but SW_H values below -0.5 decrease the slope significantly. Comparing the 2-phase and 3-phase devices show that the 3-phase devices have generally acceptable slopes regardless of SW_L and SW_H.
| OTA33 / 3-phase | OTA34 / 2-phase |
![]() |
|
Attachments (6)
- SW_tests_OTA33.png (5.7 KB ) - added by 15 years ago.
- SW_tests_OTA34.png (6.4 KB ) - added by 15 years ago.
- SW_tests_montage_big.png (1.9 MB ) - added by 15 years ago.
- merged_data (122.9 KB ) - added by 15 years ago.
- mt_difference.png (2.0 MB ) - added by 15 years ago.
- top_noise.png (501.9 KB ) - added by 15 years ago.



