IPP Software Navigation Tools IPP Links Communication Pan-STARRS Links

Changes between Version 3 and Version 4 of Image_Artifacts


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jul 28, 2009, 4:06:25 PM (17 years ago)
Author:
Paul Price
Comment:

More details about artifacts

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Image_Artifacts

    v3 v4  
    11== PS1 Image Artifacts ==
    22
    3 == Burntool ==
     3== Burns ==
    44
    5 Three different patterns that can arise from burntool.  The first has a bright streak that burntool should have removed.  The second has the burn from a star on a previous image oversubtracted either due to a bad fit or the images being processed in the wrong order.  The third shows an oversubtraction of the burn.
     5"Burns" are the result of bright sources landing on the detector in the image under consideration, or a recent image, causing trails along the detector columns.  It seems that lots of excess charge upsets the pixels.  When this charge is clocked out, some of it remains, causing a burn trail that goes upward (away from the amplifier) in the image with a bright source.  Then in subsequent exposures, the angry pixels slowly leak charge, causing burn trails that go downward (towards the amplifier).
     6
     7'burntool' has been developed by the Camera group (specifically, John Tonry) to attempt to remedy these artifacts in software.  Since it requires operation on images in the order in which they were observed, it must be run on data in the IPP after registration but before the chip stage is executed (output is named *.burn.fits, set rawImfile.user_1 = 1.0, and then turn on USE.DEBURNED.IMAGE in the PPIMAGE recipe).  Efforts are underway in the Camera group to fix these artifacts in hardware.
     8
     9Three different artifact patterns can arise from burntool.  The first has a bright streak that burntool should have removed but didn't.  The second has the burn from a star on a previous image oversubtracted either due to a bad fit or the images being processed in the wrong order.  The third shows an oversubtraction of the burn.
    610
    711[[Image(burntoolP.png)]]
     
    1317== Ghost image ==
    1418
     19The origin of these is unknown.  Are they true ghosts (due to multiple partial reflections), or are they electronic (crosstalk or burns)?
     20
    1521[[Image(ghost.png)]]
    1622
    17 == Glint from star at edge of camera ==
     23== Star glint ==
    1824
    19 See discussion here: [[wiki:PS1_GPC1_GlintMasks]]
     25A bright star just beyond the edge of the populated focal plane can cause a glint.  See discussion here: [[wiki:PS1_GPC1_GlintMasks]].
    2026
    2127[[Image(glint_s0.25.png)]]
    2228
    23 == Improperly masked halo ==
     29Moon glints may also be seen, due to light from the moon avoiding the baffles and hitting the detector.
     30
     31== Ghost ==
     32
     33Ghosts are due to reflection of a bright star off the focal plane, and re-reflection and focusing back on the focal plane by L1 or L2.  This results in an out-of-focus image (image of the pupil) on the detector.  We attempt to mask these using the astrometric model and a star catalogue, but the model of the position, size and exact shape is not particularly precise.  This results in a partially masked ghost.
     34
    2435
    2536[[Image(halo_s0.5.png)]]