Changes between Version 3 and Version 4 of IspSasProcessing

Timestamp:

Sep 8, 2012, 10:19:31 AM (14 years ago)

Author:

heather

Comment:

--

IspSasProcessing

@@ -97 +97 @@
 
 
-and here's what I think are potentially good: I require sigma_ra < 1 (is that reasonable?), n_astrom > 0 (otherwise, astrometry failed), and fwhm_major < 5 (no ideas if this is reasonable or not...)
+and here's what I think are potentially good: I require sigma_ra < 1 (is that reasonable?), n_astrom > 0 (otherwise, astrometry failed), and fwhm_major < 5 (no ideas if this is reasonable or not...) Note that we do have odd problems including dome occultation, so we do expect some fraction to suck.
 {{{
 mysql> select count(*), min(fwhm_major), max(fwhm_major)  from camRun join camProcessedExp using (cam_id) where label = 'SAS.v0' and sigma_ra < 1 and n_astrom > 0 and fwhm_major < 5;
@@ -107 +107 @@
 1 row in set (0.01 sec)
 }}}
+
+Here's the breakdown by filter:
+
+{{{
+mysql> select filter, count(*), min(fwhm_major), max(fwhm_major)  from camRun join camProcessedExp using (cam_id) join chipRun using (chip_id) join rawExp using (exp_id) where camRun.label = 'SAS.v0' and sigma_ra < 1 and n_astrom > 0 and fwhm_major < 5 group by filter;
++--------+----------+-----------------+-----------------+
+| filter | count(*) | min(fwhm_major) | max(fwhm_major) |
++--------+----------+-----------------+-----------------+
+| g      |      284 |         3.01373 |         3.65707 | 
+| i      |      719 |         1.41724 |         4.91196 | 
+| r      |      311 |          1.6642 |         4.58159 | 
+| z      |       42 |         1.48253 |         1.67822 | 
++--------+----------+-----------------+-----------------+
+4 rows in set (0.03 sec)
+}}}
+
+I'm a little surprised at the lack of y, but y is horrible to process with skyprobe, so I'm not going to worry about it for now...  Clearly, there are a lot of images in gri, and a few in z (?).  This should be enough to stack. I can sort by skycells: