| 55 | | |
| 56 | | * same photometry reference catalog as before |
| 57 | | |
| 58 | | * ... |
| 59 | | |
| 60 | | * stack-stack diffims still using forced convolution of reference stack to input images |
| 61 | | |
| 62 | | * ... |
| 63 | | |
| 64 | | |
| 65 | | * center based on current observation pointing even though there are earlier data that has offset dithered observations that populate the 0X8-0X9 skycells. not as bad as MD07, but the revised reference stack may not provide for the outer skycells very well. Afterwards it was discovered the full extent of the previous observations was wrong, shown by these exposure plots with the MD10.V3 overlay and compared to a recent nightly stack set of exposures. This may need to be shifted in the next iteration. |
| 66 | | |
| 67 | | [[Image(MD10_g_smf.png,200px)]] [[Image(MD10_r_smf.png,200px)]] [[Image(MD10_i_smf.png,200px)]] |
| 68 | | [[Image(MD10_z_smf.png,200px)]] [[Image(MD10_y_smf.png,200px)]] |
| 69 | | |
| 70 | | [[Image(MD10ns_i_smf.png,200px)]] |
| | 53 | * same photometry reference catalog as MD have previously been using. |
| | 54 | * |
| | 55 | * stack-stack diffims still using forced convolution of reference stack to input images |
| | 56 | |
| | 57 | |
| | 58 | MD10.V3 center shifted to the current observation pointing even though there are earlier data that has offset dithered observations that populate the 0X8-0X9 skycells. Not as bad as MD07, but the revised reference stack may not provide for the outer skycells very well. Afterwards it was discovered the full extent of the previous observations was wrong, shown by these exposure plots with the MD10.V3 overlay and compared to a recent nightly stack set of exposures. This may need to be shifted in the next iteration. |
| | 59 | |
| | 60 | [[Image(MD10_g_smf.png,150px)]] [[Image(MD10_r_smf.png,150px)]] [[Image(MD10_i_smf.png,150px)]] |
| | 61 | [[Image(MD10_z_smf.png,150px)]] [[Image(MD10_y_smf.png,150px)]][[Image(MD10ns_i_smf.png,150px)]] |
| 79 | | Initially ran without reduction type and ran sample of best PSF and test deep stack (version 20110722gri, 20110715y, 20110718z) along with a test sample of a best PSF focused set MD10.psfrefstack.20110814) and a test best deep stack (just skycell.055, i-band, not distributed). After discovery of this error, re-ran as DEEP_STACK reduction type (version 20110821) and should be the one used. (need to change in SSdiffs soon) |
| | 70 | [[Image(MD10.g.00000.expfwhm_stkrefpsfv2.png,300px)]] |
| | 71 | |
| | 72 | [[Image(MD10.g.00000.expfwhmzptbgmjd_stkrefpsfv2.png,400px)]] |
| | 73 | |
| | 74 | [[Image(MD10.refstack.20110722.NULL.g.00000.stksummap.png,500px)]] |
| | 75 | |
| | 76 | |
| | 77 | Initially the stack processing was ran without reduction type and ran sample of best PSF and test deep stack (version 20110722gri, 20110715y, 20110718z) along with a test sample of a best PSF focused set MD10.psfrefstack.20110814) and a test best deep stack (just skycell.055, i-band, not distributed). After discovery of this error, re-ran as DEEP_STACK reduction type (version 20110821) and should be the one used. (need to change in SSdiffs soon) |