Changes between Version 9 and Version 10 of MD02.refstack.20130815
- Timestamp:
- Aug 22, 2013, 3:34:09 PM (13 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
MD02.refstack.20130815
v9 v10 69 69 70 70 71 == MD02.V3 Processing (chip->warp + refstack) ==71 == MD02.V3 Processing (chip->warp) == 72 72 73 73 Exposure reprocessing was done for only a limited number (~150) of the best images from 2010-2012/2013 to provide a balance of N input warps for some depth minimum and assist poor pixel rejection versus best seeing, excluding exposures with large background, low zeropoints and large elongation. 74 74 75 75 Processing chip-warp and the refstack itself has the same label, data_group 76 * label: MD02.refstack.20130815 --> ''once set as active refstack for diffims, stack label will change to MD02.refstack'', chip/cam/warp label will remain the same76 * label: MD02.refstack.20130815 77 77 * data_group: MD02.refstack.20130815 78 78 … … 95 95 96 96 Previous refstack -- 97 97 {{{ 98 98 | data_group | filter | stack_id | warps_in | warps_rej | FWHM_MAJ IQ_FW1 (pixels) 99 99 +-----------------------------------+---------+----------+----------+-----------+ … … 103 103 | MD02.refstack.20120927 | z.00000 | 1510731 | 92 | 22 | 3.85 3.32 104 104 | MD02.refstack.20120927 | y.00000 | 1510671 | 86 | 25 | 3.62 3.31 105 105 }}} 106 106 107 107 = Default ISIS convolution = … … 177 177 * like others, greater % of inputs rejected (~20%) so per pixel input is less, but still of order 30 inputs per pixel minimum across core skycells and base minimum for input images on the outer edges 178 178 * skycell notes: 179 * y: 180 * z: 181 * i: 182 * r: 183 * g: 179 * y: 012,013 etc bright edges; 014,015,016 odd underflux print through, more in 1dg; 017 corner underglow print through? more in 1dg; 025,036,047,057 etc poor cell bands (need to be masked in y), again seems stronger 1dg; 180 * z: 012,013,041 again bright edge but almost really good; 014,015,016 odd underflux print through, more 1dg; 017 corner underglow print through? more 1dg; s034,035,036,047 odd bright chunk/block pront through poor cell?, 054 strip semi-hatch pattern same?; 067 odd block under/over flux but 1dg worse 181 * i: 012,013 etc again bright chunk edges; 014,015,016 underflux print through; s047,082 overflux chunks(poor cell?), 054 strip semi-hatch pattern same?; 087 isis large psf? 182 * r: 012,013 etc again; 057,044,067 underflux area and other junk/cells/corners?, worse 1dg; 058,068 really poor IQ to edge; 074 maybe ghost cluster? 183 * g: 071 failed; 041 bright chunk edges (not really s012,013 now from over rej?); 014,015,016 underflux print through; 023,025,031,036,043,044,045,051,054(!!!),073 over/underflux chunks(poor cell?), strip semi-hatch pattern same?; 074 bright star+poor cell?; many many ghosts.. 023,027,042,043,046,047,054,055,057,063,066,075,076,077,085, odd more are upper skycells, both convolutions similar but 1dg seems stronger 184 184 * some convolved stacks have poorer FWHM PSF but not significant enough to be likely improved by reprocessing using MD_DEEP_STACK config as in earlier MD fields (input cut <10 rather than <6 and FWHM+100*STDEV rather than FWHM+1.0*STDEV) 185 * g: 186 * re-processing tests (have not written this up before and should note): 187 * data_group -- MD01.refstack.20130731redo 188 * workdir base -- MD01.refstack.20130731redo 185 * g: 071,082 too few with inputs <6 pix FWHM and rerun MD_DEEP_STACK but with more stringent input exposure FWHM constraint; 021,078 too many rejected but able to relax input exposure constraint and still use MD_REF_STACK config 186 * failed (071g) initial run -- fault=5, quality=42 (for now) 187 * label -- MD02.refstack.20130815.bad 188 * data_group -- MD02.refstack.20130815.bad 189 * workdir base -- MD02.refstack.20130815 (left the same) 190 * re-processing tests (slightly modified from before and should note): 191 * data_group -- MD02.refstack.20130815.redo 192 * workdir base -- MD02.refstack.20130815.redo 189 193 * unused redo processing 190 * label -- MD0 1.refstack.20130731skip191 * data_group -- MD0 1.refstack.20130731redo192 * workdir base -- MD0 1.refstack.20130731redo194 * label -- MD02.refstack.20130815.skip 195 * data_group -- MD02.refstack.20130815.redo 196 * workdir base -- MD02.refstack.20130815.redo 193 197 * replaced original run 194 * label -- MD0 1.refstack.20130731poor195 * data_group -- MD0 1.refstack.20130731poor196 * workdir base -- original name MD0 1.refstack.20130731198 * label -- MD02.refstack.20130815.poor 199 * data_group -- MD02.refstack.20130815.poor 200 * workdir base -- original name MD02.refstack.20130815 197 201 * redo processing replacing original processing 198 202 * label -- normal refstack label 199 203 * data_group -- normal refstack data_group 200 * workdir base -- MD0 1.refstack.20130731redo204 * workdir base -- MD02.refstack.20130815.redo 201 205 202 206 … … 225 229 * single filter mode so basic psphot with deteff measurements that has the zero-point recalculated for the test plots below 226 230 * label: MD02.refstack.20130815, MD02.refstack.20130815 227 * data_group (single filter): MD02.refstack.20130815.1x2013082 1, MD02.refstack.20130815.1x20130821.cal20130821228 * multi-filter (Nx) not run yet 231 * data_group (single filter): MD02.refstack.20130815.1x20130820, MD02.refstack.20130815.1x20130820.cal20130820 232 * multi-filter (Nx) not run yet, so full stack photometry not available yet 229 233 * label: 230 234 * data_group: (all skycells have 5 filters matched) … … 316 320 == Problems == 317 321 * all pretty much the same as with the ISIS convolved stacks, though, the 1D appears to be stronger 318 * some convolved stacks have poorer FWHM PSF but not significant enough to be likely improved by reprocessing using MD_DEEP_STACK config as in earlier MD fields (input cut <10 rather than <6 and FWHM+100*STDEV rather than FWHM+1.0*STDEV) 319 * g: 320 * re-processing tests (have not written this up before and should note): 321 * data_group -- MD01.refstack.20130731redo 322 * workdir base -- MD01.refstack.20130731redo 322 * same issue with some convolved stacks have poorer FWHM PSF but not significant enough to be likely improved by reprocessing using MD_DEEP_STACK config as in earlier MD fields (input cut <10 rather than <6 and FWHM+100*STDEV rather than FWHM+1.0*STDEV) -- see above 323 * failed (071g) initial run -- fault=5, quality=42 (for now) 324 * label -- MD02.refstack.20130815_1dg.bad 325 * data_group -- MD02.refstack.20130815_1dg.bad 326 * workdir base -- MD02.refstack.20130815_1dg (left the same) 327 * re-processing tests (slightly modified from before and should note) -- basically _1dg after refstack.<date> 328 * data_group -- MD02.refstack.20130815_1dg.redo 329 * workdir base -- MD02.refstack.20130815_1dg.redo 323 330 * unused redo processing 324 * label -- MD0 1.refstack.20130731skip325 * data_group -- MD0 1.refstack.20130731redo326 * workdir base -- MD0 1.refstack.20130731redo331 * label -- MD02.refstack.20130815_1dg.skip 332 * data_group -- MD02.refstack.20130815_1dg.redo 333 * workdir base -- MD02.refstack.20130815_1dg.redo 327 334 * replaced original run 328 * label -- MD0 1.refstack.20130731poor329 * data_group -- MD0 1.refstack.20130731poor330 * workdir base -- original name MD0 1.refstack.20130731335 * label -- MD02.refstack.20130815_1dg.poor 336 * data_group -- MD02.refstack.20130815_1dg.poor 337 * workdir base -- original name MD02.refstack.20130815_1dg 331 338 * redo processing replacing original processing 332 339 * label -- normal refstack label 333 340 * data_group -- normal refstack data_group 334 * workdir base -- MD01.refstack.20130731redo 341 * workdir base -- MD02.refstack.20130815_1dg.redo 342 335 343 336 344 … … 345 353 * single filter mode so basic psphot with deteff measurements that has the zero-point recalculated for the test plots below 346 354 * label: MD02.refstack.20130815_1dg, MD02.refstack.20130815_1dg 347 * data_group (single filter): MD02.refstack.20130815_1dg.1x2013082 1, MD02.refstack.20130815_1dg.1x20130821.cal20130821355 * data_group (single filter): MD02.refstack.20130815_1dg.1x20130820, MD02.refstack.20130815_1dg.1x20130820.cal20130820 348 356 * multi-filter (Nx) not run yet 349 357 * label:
