Changes between Version 13 and Version 14 of MD03.refstack.20121101

Timestamp:

Nov 8, 2012, 11:48:04 AM (14 years ago)

Author:

Mark Huber

Comment:

--

MD03.refstack.20121101

@@ -89 +89 @@
   * i: 017, 082 -- basically oddly large FWHM, redo with DEEP_STACK didn't change so kept original.
   * z: 038  -- oddly large FWHM, redo with DEEP_STACK helped and --replaced-- original.
-  * y: 021 -- oddly large FWHM, redo with DEEP_STACK didn't really help and kept original.
+  * y: 021 -- oddly large FWHM, redo with DEEP_STACK didn't really help and kept original. 087 -- poor target PSF and redo with DEEP_STACK --replaced-- original.
  * bad cell arc in primarily skycell.033,024,025,026,047 y-band from ota14, cell 31. Not really seen in skycell.036 like others.
  * poor/bad cell arc in primarily skycell.064 g-band (and less so in other filters) from ota43, cell 54? see [wiki:MD10.refstack.20120705] where was in skycell.054.
  * misc clusters of ghosts in g-band 
- * skycal photometry for skycell.077 (and possibly 078, 087) basically fails (see ZPT_ERR~1.05) and is the cause of the shallow detection limit @0.2 mag map. 
+ * skycal photometry basically fails but doesn't fault for skycell.077 (and possibly 078, 087)  with ZPT_ERR~1.05 and is the cause of the shallow detection limit @0.2 mag map. (probably want a fault if ERR>X config option)
 
 Core coverage is the default set
@@ -100 +100 @@
 12-17
  * weaker (fewer inputs) for 012,017,021,028,071,078,082,087 in various filters 
- * using 2009 data and even in other years has provided some fringe skycells in the refstack to be aware/wary of
+ * using 2009 data and even in other years has provided some additional edge skycells in the refstack to be aware or wary of. Likely won't be covered enough for many diffims.
 g: 005, 030, 040, 050, 095
 r: 004, 005, 058, 095