IPP Software Navigation Tools IPP Links Communication Pan-STARRS Links

Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of MD04.refstack.20121125


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Nov 25, 2012, 2:26:44 AM (14 years ago)
Author:
Mark Huber
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • MD04.refstack.20121125

    v1 v2  
    2626 * 11/?? refstack runs finished
    2727
     28
     29== MD04.V3  Processing (chip->warp + refstack) ==
     30
     31Exposure reprocessing was done for only a limited number (~150) of the best images from 2010-2011 to provide a balance of N input warps versus best seeing, excluding exposures with large background, low zeropoints and large elongation.
     32
     33Processing chip-warp and the refstack itself has the same label, data_group
     34 * label: MD04.refstack.20121125 --> ''once set as active refstack for diffims, stack label will change to MD04.refstack'', chip/cam/warp label will remain the same
     35 * data_group: MD04.refstack.20121125
     36
     37New ipp-20121026 tag used but shouldn't be any large changes for refstack processing versus ipp-20120802.
     38
     39Histograms of the FWHM major and minor and elongation from camera stage value (full exposure) for the sample of reprocessed exposures (red) and used for refstack.20121122 (top blue) and used for refstack.20111012 (bottom blue) in grizy order
     40
     41|| [[Image(.g.expfwhm.png,300px)]] || [[Image(.r.expfwhm.png,300px)]] || [[Image(.i.expfwhm.png,300px)]] ||
     42|| [[Image(.z.expfwhm.png,300px)]] || [[Image(.y.expfwhm.png,300px)]] ||   ||
     43
     44
     45Test stack (reftest) sample also made again for skycell.055 with different number of input warps.
     46 * label: MD04.reftest.20121125
     47 * data_group:
     48  * MD04.reftest.20121125.c#f<FWHM cut> where #=comparison run, <FWHM cut>=cut  <fwhm_major from camProcessedExp x10>
     49  * MD04.reftest.20121125.all.<FWHM cut> where all means 2009+2010+2011 data possible, <FWHM cut>=cut <fwhm_major from camProcessedExp x10>
     50  * MD04.reftest.20121125.2010.<FWHM cut> where 2010 means 2010+2011 data only, <FWHM cut>=cut <fwhm_major from camProcessedExp x10>
     51
     52
     53Summary comparison table with the approximate FWHM (major) as the PSF FWHM from a center field skycell (V3=055) after running psphot on the stacks.
     54
     55{{{
     56| data_group                    | filter  | stack_id | warps_in | warps_rej |  FWHM_MAJ   IQ_FW1 (pixels)
     57+-------------------------------+---------+----------+----------+-----------+
     58--> 2012/2013 refstack
     59
     60--> reftest comparisons         
     61
     62
     63--> previous 2011/2012 refstack         
     64
     65
     66
     67
     68}}}
     69
     70
     71
     72As before, the FWHM_MAJOR with the central skycell can be variable and more so with largely different input sets. Comparison with the psf_major/minor maps are more useful between refstack versions.
     73
     74
     75== Problems (to be updated) ==
     76 * generally edge skycells have issues, need better containment of those still. (see Core coverage below).
     77 * some convolved stacks have strange/poor FWHM PSF -- reprocessed using DEEP_STACK config with lighter input restrictions so may not have best FWHM, but 99% on the edge of field so won't anyways. Seems to be fewer problems compared to previous refstacks.
     78  * g:
     79  * r:
     80  * i:
     81  * z:
     82  * y:
     83 * bad cell arc in primarily skycell.033,024,025,026,047 y-band from ota14, cell 31. Not really seen in skycell.036 like others. ??
     84 * poor/bad cell arc in primarily skycell.064 g-band (and less so in other filters) from ota43, cell 54? see [wiki:MD10.refstack.20120705] where was in skycell.054. ??
     85 * misc clusters of ghosts in g-band
     86
     87Core coverage is the default set
     8882-87
     89x1-x8
     9012-17
     91 * weaker (fewer inputs) for 012,017,021,028,071,078,082,087 in various filters  ??
     92 * using 2009 data in y-band and even in other years has provided some additional edge skycells in the refstack to be aware or wary of. Likely won't be covered enough for many diffims.
     93  * g:
     94  * r:
     95  * i:
     96  * z:
     97  * y:
     98
     99
     100== Refstack Summary ==
     101Refstacks run through the staticsky (single filter mode so basic psphot with deteff measurements) and skycal stage on the unconvolved stacks to make the map plots (full 5 filter version still having occasional faults to work through):
     102 * label: MD04.refstack.20121125, MD04.refstack.20121125
     103 * data_group:  MD04.refstack.20121125.1x201211xx, MD04.refstack.2012xxxx.1x201211xx.cal201211xx
     104
     105
     106Source photometry psf_major,_minor maps (grizy):
     107
     108|| [[Image(md04v2012x1skycal_cmf_g.txt_psfmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md04v2012x1skycal_cmf_r.txt_psfmap.png,300px)]] ||  [[Image(md04v2012x1skycal_cmf_i.txt_psfmap.png,300px)]] ||  [[Image(md04v2012x1skycal_cmf_z.txt_psfmap.png,300px)]] ||  [[Image(md04v2012x1skycal_cmf_y.txt_psfmap.png,300px)]] ||   
     109
     110
     111Magnitude of sources@5-sigma maps (grizy):
     112
     113|| [[Image(md04v2012x1skycal_cmf_g.txt_mag5sigmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md04v2012x1skycal_cmf_r.txt_mag5sigmap.png,300px)]] ||  [[Image(md04v2012x1skycal_cmf_i.txt_mag5sigmap.png,300px)]] ||  [[Image(md04v2012x1skycal_cmf_z.txt_mag5sigmap.png,300px)]] ||  [[Image(md04v2012x1skycal_cmf_y.txt_mag5sigmap.png,300px)]] ||
     114
     115
     116Detection efficiency magnitude @50% recovery (500 fakes, grizy):
     117
     118|| [[Image(md04v2012x1skycal_cmf_g.txt_mag50gridmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md04v2012x1skycal_cmf_r.txt_mag50gridmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md04v2012x1skycal_cmf_i.txt_mag50gridmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md04v2012x1skycal_cmf_z.txt_mag50gridmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md04v2012x1skycal_cmf_y.txt_mag50gridmap.png,300px)]] ||