Changes between Version 5 and Version 6 of MD05.refstack.20121202

Timestamp:

Dec 6, 2012, 11:21:58 AM (14 years ago)

Author:

Mark Huber

Comment:

--

MD05.refstack.20121202

@@ -26 +26 @@
  * 12/02 reftest runs to be setup, evaluated. 
  * 12/03 setup being overrun by LAP + staticsky, the refstacks started but will take >3x longer than normal.. maybe done by end of week
- * 12/?? refstack runs finished
+ * 12/06 refstack runs finished, distributed, ready for MD05 diffims
 
 
@@ -124 +124 @@
  * generally edge skycells have issues, need better containment of those still. (see Core coverage below).
  * some convolved stacks have strange/poor FWHM PSF -- reprocessed using DEEP_STACK config with lighter input restrictions so may not have best FWHM, but 99% on the edge of field so won't anyways. Seems to be fewer problems compared to previous refstacks.
-  * g:
-  * r: 
-  * i: 
-  * z:
-  * y:
+  * g: 087 redo with DEEP_STACK but also with fewer inputs, contrary to other MD cases this will likely have smaller FWHM but not be as deep.
+  * r: --
+  * i: --
+  * z: --
+  * y: --
  * bad cell arc in primarily skycell.033,024,025,026,047 y-band from ota14, cell 31. Not really seen in skycell.036 like others. ??
  * poor/bad cell arc in primarily skycell.064 g-band (and less so in other filters) from ota43, cell 54? see [wiki:MD10.refstack.20120705] where was in skycell.054. ??
@@ -134 +134 @@
 
 Core coverage is the default set
+{{
 82-87
 x1-x8
 12-17
+}}}
  * weaker (fewer inputs) for 012,017,021,028,071,078,082,087 in various filters  
  * using 2009 data in y-band and even in other years has provided some additional edge skycells in the refstack to be aware or wary of. Likely won't be covered enough for many diffims.