IPP Software Navigation Tools IPP Links Communication Pan-STARRS Links

Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of MD08.refstack.20130401


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Apr 5, 2013, 12:18:24 PM (13 years ago)
Author:
Mark Huber
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • MD08.refstack.20130401

    v1 v1  
     1= Summary of MD08.refstack.20130401 =
     2[[PageOutline]]
     3
     4(back to [wiki:MediumDeepFields] summary)
     5
     6Similar to the MD08.GR0 ([wiki:MD.GR0#MD08.GR0]) refstacks for the 2011/2012 season, these include recent improvement and input cuts to help constrain the convolved stacks as well. Because the refstack is made with reprocessed pixels, the refstack pixels will now have the ubercalibration and all current detrend calibrations for the new season. Overall fewer inputs to the refstack were done this round and may not be as deep as last season.
     7
     8MD08 observations:
     9 * starting ~mid-April 2013, already pre-obs in March
     10 * end-April 2012 through early Sept. 2012
     11 * early February 2011 through early Oct. 2011
     12 * early April 2010 through end Sept. 2010
     13 * mid-April 2009 through end Sept. 2009
     14
     15
     16|| '''Filter''' || '''N total''' || '''N FWHM<8 pixels''' ||  '''N (FWHM<8 pixels for 2011/2012''' ||
     17|| || || || ||
     18|| g || 531 || 454 || 53 ||
     19|| r || 
     20|| i || 
     21|| z ||
     22|| y ||
     23|| || || || ||
     24
     25
     26Status:
     27 * 04/0/13 selected exposure reprocessing chip->warp for refstack started (late due to power outage and messy system crashes)
     28 * 04/05 reftests finished, full refstack started
     29 * (04/06) refstack finished, checked and problem skycells found/fixed -- may extend through 4/8 depending if want to work on weekend yet again..
     30 * (04/08) staticsky single filter only finished
     31 * (04/09) mappings finished, reftest+refstack to distribution, refstack setup, recently missed exposures setup for diffims..
     32
     33== MD08.V3  Processing (chip->warp + refstack) ==
     34
     35Exposure reprocessing was done for only a limited number (~150) of the best images from 2010-2012 to provide a balance of N input warps versus best seeing, excluding exposures with large background, low zeropoints and large elongation.
     36
     37Processing chip-warp and the refstack itself has the same label, data_group
     38 * label: MD08.refstack.20130401 --> ''once set as active refstack for diffims, stack label will change to MD08.refstack'', chip/cam/warp label will remain the same
     39 * data_group: MD08.refstack.20130401
     40
     41
     42Newer ipp-20130307 tag used.
     43
     44Histograms of the FWHM major and minor and elongation from camera stage value (full exposure) for the sample of reprocessed exposures (red) and used for refstack.20130401 (top blue) and used for refstack.20120422 (bottom blue) in grizy order
     45
     46|| [[Image(MD08.png,300px)]] || [[Image(.png,300px)]] || [[Image(.png,300px)]] ||
     47|| [[Image(.png,300px)]] || [[Image(.png,300px)]] ||   ||
     48
     49
     50Test stack (reftest) sample also made again for skycell.055 with different number of input warps.
     51 * label: MD08.reftest.20130401
     52 * data_group:
     53  * MD08.reftest.20130401.c#f<FWHM cut> where #=comparison run, <FWHM cut>=cut  <fwhm_major from camProcessedExp x10>
     54  * MD08.reftest.20130401.all.<FWHM cut> where all means 03/2010+2011+2012 data possible, <FWHM cut>=cut <fwhm_major from camProcessedExp x10>
     55  * MD08.reftest.20130401.2012.<FWHM cut> where 2012 means 2012 data only for season stack example case, <FWHM cut>=cut <fwhm_major from camProcessedExp x10>
     56 * the main field center shift was through ~May 2010, but is a very small shift. Excluding 2009 since usually not very good, or uncharacteristically too good (avoiding problems basically)
     57 * c1 cuts
     58{{{
     59filter: (FWHM set), elongation, zeropoint, background upper limits
     60y: (3.5, 3.8, 4.0, 4.2), 1.3, 22.8, 4000 --
     61z: (3.8, 3.9, 4.0, 4.2), 1.3, 24.0, 3000 --
     62i: (4.0, 4.2, 4.4, 4.6), 1.25, 24.3, 2000 --
     63r: (4.0, 4.3, 4.5, 4.7), 1.25, 24.3, 500 --
     64g: (4.8, 5.0, 5.1, 5.3), 1.25, 24.3, 300 --
     65}}}
     66
     67Summary comparison table with the approximate FWHM (major) as the PSF FWHM from a center field skycell (V3=055) after running psphot on the stacks.
     68
     69{{{
     70| data_group                    | filter  | stack_id | warps_in | warps_rej |  FWHM_MAJ   IQ_FW1 (pixels)
     71+-------------------------------+---------+----------+----------+-----------+
     72--> 2012/2013 refstack
     73
     74--> reftest comparisons                         
     75
     76--> previous 2011/2012 refstack                         
     77
     78}}}
     79
     80
     81
     82As before, the FWHM_MAJOR with the central skycell can be variable and more so with largely different input sets. Comparison with the psf_major/minor maps are more useful between refstack versions.
     83
     84
     85== Problems  ==
     86(need to update)
     87 * generally edge skycells have issues, need better containment of those still. (see core coverage below). g,r has additionally ratty edge skycells.
     88 * like others, greater % of inputs rejected (20-30%) so per pixel input is less, but still of order 30 inputs per pixel
     89 * some convolved stacks have poorer FWHM PSF but not significant enough to be likely improved by reprocessing using DEEP_STACK config as in earlier MD fields (ie s083r, and a bit s011i, s017g)
     90 * as this is a field with a large center offset, the center is more contained in skycell.044 and has the degraded FWHM in gri
     91 * skycell details:
     92  * y: s032,042,052,062,063,083 cell print through problem (from ota14, cell 31); s034 bright junk; s044 center/dither spot; s003,004,040 cell odd/bright chunks on edge
     93  * z: s005,006,040 undersampled, messy edge; s034,062 bright junk
     94  * i: s006,040 undersampled, messy edge; s015,034,062 (057 less) bright junk
     95  * r: s005,038 undersampled, messy edge; s003,031,032,033,037,045,051,053, and more ghosts; s014,034,074 (057 less) bright junk; s021,022 strong scattered light
     96  * g: s045 poor cell print through and ghosts; s013,034,037,047,054,057(less),064,073,074(bad),s084 bright junk; ; s003,004,017,038,050,068,071,077 undersampled, messy edge; s051,055 strong, s024,042,066,067,072 smeared, 021, ghosts; s021,022 scattered light;
     97
     98
     99
     100Core coverage  -- one of the larger shifted pointings so very different from normal distribution of skycells (also see detection efficiency maps below)
     101{{{
     102083--086
     103071--077
     104061--068
     105050--058
     106040--048
     107030--038
     108021--028
     109011--017
     110003--005
     111}}}
     112 * skycells with fewer inputs: 003,028,068,086; 011,028,071 <50%
     113
     114
     115
     116== Refstack Summary ==
     117Refstacks run through the staticsky (single filter mode so basic psphot with deteff measurements) and skycal stage on the unconvolved stacks to make the map plots (full 5 filter version still having occasional faults to work through):
     118 * label: MD08.refstack.20130401, MD08.refstack.20130401
     119 * data_group:  MD08.refstack.20130401.1x20130408, MD08.refstack.20130401.1x20130408.cal20130408
     120
     121
     122Source photometry psf_major,_minor maps (grizy):
     123
     124|| [[Image(md08v2013x1skycal_cmf_g.txt_psfmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md08v2013x1skycal_cmf_r.txt_psfmap.png,300px)]] ||  [[Image(md08v2013x1skycal_cmf_i.txt_psfmap.png,300px)]] ||  [[Image(md08v2013x1skycal_cmf_z.txt_psfmap.png,300px)]] ||  [[Image(md08v2013x1skycal_cmf_y.txt_psfmap.png,300px)]] ||   
     125
     126
     127Magnitude of sources@5-sigma maps (grizy):
     128
     129|| [[Image(md08v2013x1skycal_cmf_g.txt_mag5sigmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md08v2013x1skycal_cmf_r.txt_mag5sigmap.png,300px)]] ||  [[Image(md08v2013x1skycal_cmf_i.txt_mag5sigmap.png,300px)]] ||  [[Image(md08v2013x1skycal_cmf_z.txt_mag5sigmap.png,300px)]] ||  [[Image(md08v2013x1skycal_cmf_y.txt_mag5sigmap.png,300px)]] ||
     130
     131
     132Detection efficiency magnitude @50% recovery (500 fakes, grizy):
     133
     134|| [[Image(md08v2013x1skycal_cmf_g.txt_mag50gridmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md08v2013x1skycal_cmf_r.txt_mag50gridmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md08v2013x1skycal_cmf_i.txt_mag50gridmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md08v2013x1skycal_cmf_z.txt_mag50gridmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md08v2013x1skycal_cmf_y.txt_mag50gridmap.png,300px)]] ||
     135
     136