Changes between Version 11 and Version 12 of MD10.refstack.20120705

Timestamp:

Oct 8, 2012, 2:27:07 PM (14 years ago)

Author:

Mark Huber

Comment:

--

MD10.refstack.20120705

@@ -23 +23 @@
  * label: MD10.refstack.20120705
  * data_group: MD10.refstack.20120705
+Cuts used:
 
 Replacement refstack made using the 20120705 reprocessed exposures
@@ -41 +42 @@
   * MD10.reftest.20120705.all.<FWHM cut> where all means 2009+2010+2011 data possible, <FWHM cut>=cut <fwhm_major from camProcessedExp x10>
   * MD10.reftest.20120705.2011.<FWHM cut> where 2011 means 2011 data only, <FWHM cut>=cut <fwhm_major from camProcessedExp x10>
-Some of the test c1f cases had problems in the convolved stack (odd PSF), so a c2f set was run with different FWHM upper limits to see if could be improved. 
+Some of the test c1f cases had problems in the convolved stack (odd PSF), so a c2f set was run with different FWHM upper limits to see if could be improved. Only a couple are noted in the table below. 
 
 Summary comparison table with the approximate FWHM (major) as the PSF FWHM from a center field skycell (V3=055) after running psphot on the stacks. The replaced refstack.20120804 should be similar to the original refstack.20120705 and the tests. Note with the change in input cuts/restrictions, the Ninput~100 is cut to the best ~70.
@@ -73 +74 @@
 || MD10.reftest.20120705.c1f41  || i || 60(4) ||   ||
 || MD10.reftest.20120705.c1f43  || i || 68(3) ||   ||
+|| MD10.reftest.20120705.c2f42  || i || 89(14) ||   ||
 || old MD10.refstack.20110821  || i || 75(1) || 3.96 ||
 || || || || ||
@@ -91 +93 @@
 || MD10.reftest.20120705.c1f47  || y ||  80(19) ||   ||
 || MD10.reftest.20120705.c1f52  || y ||  108(34) ||   ||
+|| MD10.reftest.20120705.c2f45b  || y ||  71(11) ||   ||
 || old MD10.refstack.20110821  || y || 63(11) || 3.84 ||
 || || || || ||
 
+Additional cuts used (including reftest.c1f,c2f):
 
 == Problems ==