IPP Software Navigation Tools IPP Links Communication Pan-STARRS Links

Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of MD10.refstack.20130715


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jul 15, 2013, 1:05:33 PM (13 years ago)
Author:
Mark Huber
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • MD10.refstack.20130715

    v1 v1  
     1= Summary of MD10.refstack.20130715 =
     2[[PageOutline]]
     3
     4(back to [wiki:MediumDeepFields] summary)
     5
     6Similar to the revised MD10.refstack.20120804 ([wiki:MD10.refstack.20120705]) refstacks for the 2012 season, these include recent improvements for the PV2 (list?). Overall fewer inputs to the refstack were done this round and may not be as deep as last season.
     7
     8MD10 observations:
     9 * starting late June 2013 with pre-observations, regular observations mid-July
     10 * end July 2012 through start Jan. 2013
     11 * mid-July 2011 through early Dec. 2011
     12 * late June 2010 through early Dec. 2010
     13 * end Aug. 2009 through start Jan. 2010
     14 * (some 2008 but pre-survey)
     15
     16
     17|| '''Filter''' || '''N total''' || '''N FWHM<8 pixels''' ||  '''N (FWHM<8 pixels for 2012''' || '''N FWHM<6 pixels''' ||  '''N (FWHM<6 pixels for 2012''' ||
     18|| || || || ||
     19|| g || 627 || 591 || 120 || 478 || 72 ||
     20|| r || 613 || 584 || 111 || 515 || 83 ||
     21|| i || 608 || 565 || 145 || 483 || 117 ||
     22|| z || 660 || 610 || 180 || 559 || 150 ||
     23|| y || 557 || 504 || 217 || 396 || 150 ||
     24|| || || || ||
     25 * 2012 wasn't a great season for MD10, but better than MD09
     26
     27
     28Status:
     29 * 07/15/13 selected exposure reprocessing chip->warp for refstack started
     30 * 07/16? reftests finished, full refstack started -- may want to do test diffims before starting refstack
     31 * 07/17? refstack finished, checked and problem skycells found/fixed if possible. staticsky single filter only finished and mappings started
     32 * 07/18? mappings finished, reftest+refstack to distribution
     33 * 07/19? refstack setup, recently missed exposures setup for diffims --
     34
     35
     36== MD10.V3  Processing (chip->warp + refstack) ==
     37
     38Exposure reprocessing was done for only a limited number (~150) of the best images from 2010-2012 to provide a balance of N input warps versus best seeing, excluding exposures with large background, low zeropoints and large elongation.
     39
     40Processing chip-warp and the refstack itself has the same label, data_group
     41 * label: MD10.refstack.20130715 --> ''once set as active refstack for diffims, stack label will change to MD10.refstack'', chip/cam/warp label will remain the same
     42 * data_group: MD10.refstack.20130715
     43
     44
     45The ipp-20130715 tag used -- PV2
     46
     47Histograms of the FWHM major and minor and elongation from camera stage value (full exposure) for the sample of reprocessed exposures (red) and used for refstack.20130715 (top blue) and used for refstack.20120804 (bottom blue) in grizy order
     48
     49|| [[Image(MD10.refstack.20130715-MD10.refstack.20130715.s055-MD10.refstack.20120804.s055.g.expfwhm.png,300px)]] || [[Image(MD10.refstack.20130715-MD10.refstack.20130715.s055-MD10.refstack.20120804.s055.r.expfwhm.png,300px)]] || [[Image(MD10.refstack.20130715-MD10.refstack.20130715.s055-MD10.refstack.20120804.s055.i.expfwhm.png,300px)]] ||
     50|| [[Image(MD10.refstack.20130715-MD10.refstack.20130715.s055-MD10.refstack.20120804.s055.z.expfwhm.png,300px)]] || [[Image(MD10.refstack.20130715-MD10.refstack.20130715.s055-MD10.refstack.20120804.s055.y.expfwhm.png,300px)]] ||   ||
     51
     52
     53Test stack (reftest) sample also made again for skycell.055 with different number of input warps.
     54 * label: MD10.reftest.20130715
     55 * data_group:
     56  * MD10.reftest.20130715.c#f<FWHM cut> where #=comparison run, <FWHM cut>=cut  <fwhm_major from camProcessedExp x10>
     57  * MD10.reftest.20130715.all.<FWHM cut> where all means 05/2010+2011+2012 data possible, <FWHM cut>=cut <fwhm_major from camProcessedExp x10>
     58  * MD10.reftest.20130715.2012.<FWHM cut> where 2012 means 2012 data only for season stack example case, <FWHM cut>=cut <fwhm_major from camProcessedExp x10>
     59 * the main field center shift was through ~Dec 2009, but is a very small shift. Excluding 2009 since usually not very good, or uncharacteristically too good (avoiding problems basically)
     60 * c1 cuts
     61{{{
     62filter: (FWHM set), elongation, zeropoint, background limits
     63y: (3.6, 3.9, 4.1, 4.5), 1.3, 22.8, 4000 --
     64z: (3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 4.0), 1.3, 24.0, 3000 --
     65i: (3.9, 4.1, 4.2, 4.4), 1.25, 24.3, 2000 --
     66r: (4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.6), 1.25, 24.3, 600 --
     67g: (4.6, 4.8, 4.9, 5.1), 1.25, 24.3, 400 --
     68}}}
     69
     70Summary comparison table with the approximate FWHM (major) as the PSF FWHM from a center field skycell (V3=055) after running psphot on the stacks.
     71
     72{{{
     73| data_group                    | filter  | stack_id | warps_in | warps_rej |  FWHM_MAJ   IQ_FW1 (pixels)
     74+-------------------------------+---------+----------+----------+-----------+
     75--> 2013 refstack
     76       
     77--> reftest comparisons                                 
     78       
     79--> previous 2012 refstack                             
     80
     81}}}
     82
     83As before, the FWHM_MAJOR with the central skycell can be variable and more so with largely different input sets. Comparison with the psf_major/minor maps are more useful between refstack versions.
     84
     85
     86== Problems  ==
     87 * as with all past refstacks, generally edge skycells have issues -- need better containment of those still. (see core coverage below).
     88 * like others, greater % of inputs rejected (20-30%) so per pixel input is less, but still of order 30 inputs per pixel
     89 * some convolved stacks have poorer FWHM PSF but not significant enough to be likely improved by reprocessing using DEEP_STACK config as in earlier MD fields
     90 * skycell notes:
     91  * y:
     92  * z:
     93  * i:
     94  * r:
     95  * g:
     96
     97Core coverage  -- one of the larger shifted pointings so very different from normal distribution of skycells (also see detection efficiency maps below)
     98{{{
     99}}}
     100 * skycells with fewer inputs:
     101
     102
     103== Refstack Summary ==
     104Refstacks run through the staticsky (single filter mode so basic psphot with deteff measurements) and skycal stage on the unconvolved stacks to make the map plots (full 5 filter version still having occasional faults to work through):
     105 * label: MD10.refstack.20130715, MD10.refstack.20130715
     106 * data_group:  MD10.refstack.20130715.1x20130715, MD10.refstack.20130715.1x20130715.cal20130715
     107
     108
     109Source photometry psf_major,_minor maps (grizy):
     110
     111|| [[Image(md10v2013x1skycal_cmf_g.txt_psfmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md10v2013x1skycal_cmf_r.txt_psfmap.png,300px)]] ||  [[Image(md10v2013x1skycal_cmf_i.txt_psfmap.png,300px)]] ||  [[Image(md10v2013x1skycal_cmf_z.txt_psfmap.png,300px)]] ||  [[Image(md10v2013x1skycal_cmf_y.txt_psfmap.png,300px)]] ||   
     112
     113
     114Magnitude of sources@5-sigma maps (grizy):
     115
     116|| [[Image(md10v2013x1skycal_cmf_g.txt_mag5sigmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md10v2013x1skycal_cmf_r.txt_mag5sigmap.png,300px)]] ||  [[Image(md10v2013x1skycal_cmf_i.txt_mag5sigmap.png,300px)]] ||  [[Image(md10v2013x1skycal_cmf_z.txt_mag5sigmap.png,300px)]] ||  [[Image(md10v2013x1skycal_cmf_y.txt_mag5sigmap.png,300px)]] ||
     117
     118
     119Detection efficiency magnitude @50% recovery (500 fakes, grizy):
     120
     121|| [[Image(md10v2013x1skycal_cmf_g.txt_mag50gridmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md10v2013x1skycal_cmf_r.txt_mag50gridmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md10v2013x1skycal_cmf_i.txt_mag50gridmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md10v2013x1skycal_cmf_z.txt_mag50gridmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md10v2013x1skycal_cmf_y.txt_mag50gridmap.png,300px)]] ||