| 336 | | == test stack and diffims == |
| 337 | | |
| | 336 | == Test Night Stack == |
| | 337 | |
| | 338 | Night 20130707 g and z |
| | 339 | label: meh_md10nstest20130707, meh_md10nstest20130707_1dg |
| | 340 | data_group: meh_md10nstest20130707<f>, meh_md10nstest20130707<f>_1dg -- <f> is g or z filter |
| | 341 | |
| | 342 | Another rejection oddity problem -- excess rejection even with trunk modification to use OPTIMUM.TOL, entire images (not convolved because > target PSF) are being fully rejected in pixel rejection stage. Also from example log notice Target seeing FWHM appears not well matched and may be due to recent psphot PSF fixes. |
| | 343 | |
| | 344 | {{{ |
| | 345 | | data_group | filter | stack_id | warps_in | warps_rej | |
| | 346 | +-----------------------------+---------+----------+----------+-----------+ |
| | 347 | | meh_md10nstest20130707g | g.00000 | 2355589 | 8 | 0 | |
| | 348 | | meh_md10nstest20130707z | z.00000 | 2355649 | 8 | 0 | |
| | 349 | | meh_md10nstest20130707g_1dg | g.00000 | 2355709 | 8 | 0 | |
| | 350 | | meh_md10nstest20130707z_1dg | z.00000 | 2355769 | 8 | 5 | |
| | 351 | }}} |
| | 352 | |
| | 353 | neb://any/meh/meh_md10nstest20130707z_1dg/MD10.V3/skycell.055/MD10.V3.skycell.055.stk.2355769.log |
| | 354 | |
| | 355 | {{{ |
| | 356 | Input seeing FWHMs: |
| | 357 | Input 0: 5.394163 |
| | 358 | Input 1: 5.390012 |
| | 359 | Input 2: 5.393055 |
| | 360 | Input 3: 5.100585 |
| | 361 | Input 4: 5.308995 |
| | 362 | Input 5: 4.463570 |
| | 363 | Input 6: 4.224805 |
| | 364 | Input 7: 3.980880 |
| | 365 | Input FWHMs : 4.907008 +/- 0.588663 |
| | 366 | |
| | 367 | Target seeing FWHM: 4.742117 |
| | 368 | |
| | 369 | Stage 2: Generate Convolutions and Save: 161.477153 sec |
| | 370 | Summary of images for initial combination: |
| | 371 | Image 0: Good. |
| | 372 | Image 1: Good. |
| | 373 | Image 2: Good. |
| | 374 | Image 3: Good. |
| | 375 | Image 4: Good. |
| | 376 | Image 5: Good. |
| | 377 | Image 6: Good. |
| | 378 | Image 7: Good. |
| | 379 | Stage 3: Make Initial Stack: 290.986779 sec |
| | 380 | Rejection on image 0 didn't work --- reject entire image. |
| | 381 | Time to perform rejection on image 0: 0.304300 sec |
| | 382 | Rejection on image 1 didn't work --- reject entire image. |
| | 383 | Time to perform rejection on image 1: 0.272519 sec |
| | 384 | Rejection on image 2 didn't work --- reject entire image. |
| | 385 | Time to perform rejection on image 2: 0.274936 sec |
| | 386 | Rejection on image 3 didn't work --- reject entire image. |
| | 387 | Time to perform rejection on image 3: 0.274820 sec |
| | 388 | Rejection on image 4 didn't work --- reject entire image. |
| | 389 | Time to perform rejection on image 4: 0.275285 sec |
| | 390 | Convolve image: 5.637316 sec |
| | 391 | 150010 pixels rejected from image 5 (0.4%) |
| | 392 | Time to perform rejection on image 5: 6.448552 sec |
| | 393 | Convolve image: 5.874424 sec |
| | 394 | 102450 pixels rejected from image 6 (0.3%) |
| | 395 | Time to perform rejection on image 6: 6.665843 sec |
| | 396 | Convolve image: 5.654609 sec |
| | 397 | 93433 pixels rejected from image 7 (0.2%) |
| | 398 | Time to perform rejection on image 7: 6.459099 sec |
| | 399 | |
| | 400 | Stage 4: Pixel Rejection: 21.048442 sec |
| | 401 | Summary of images for final combination: |
| | 402 | Image 0: Rejection exceeded threshold. |
| | 403 | Image 1: Rejection exceeded threshold. |
| | 404 | Image 2: Rejection exceeded threshold. |
| | 405 | Image 3: Rejection exceeded threshold. |
| | 406 | Image 4: Rejection exceeded threshold. |
| | 407 | Image 5: Good. |
| | 408 | Image 6: Good. |
| | 409 | Image 7: Good. |
| | 410 | Stage 5: Final Stack: 12.869377 sec |
| | 411 | |
| | 412 | }}} |