Changes between Version 65 and Version 66 of MD_WSdiffim_photcheck_test20121004
- Timestamp:
- Dec 11, 2012, 11:35:41 AM (14 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
MD_WSdiffim_photcheck_test20121004
v65 v66 54 54 55 55 }}} 56 * AP_MAG close b ut offset from SMF ~0.2 (fainter). Seems like the target conv may be poor for o6157g0219o with grossly largerpsf_major.56 * AP_MAG close between the two exposures (~0.013) but largely offset from SMF ~0.2 (fainter). Also seems like the target conv may be poor with large difference in psf_major. 57 57 58 58 … … 60 60 * '''appears to be an issue with psphot and debug options triggered @level 6, re-run to use normal ops build w/o trace or with values <6''' 61 61 62 * original warps, transformed photometry in warps from SMF: should be same as SMF and i s62 * original warps, transformed photometry in warps from SMF: should be same as SMF and it is 63 63 {{{ 64 64 IPP_IDET CAL_PSF_MAG CAL_PSF_MAG_SIG PSF_INST_MAG PSF_INST_MAG_SIG AP_MAG AP_MAG_RAW PSF_MAJOR PSF_QF_PERFECT FLAGS FLAGS2 DIFF_NRATIO_BAD rsep … … 69 69 }}} 70 70 71 * basic psphot run with current ipp-20121026 tag, random seed: 71 * basic psphot run with current ipp-20121026 tag, random seed: similar except exposure 0219 is different by ~0.035 mag 72 72 {{{ 73 73 IPP_IDET CAL_PSF_MAG CAL_PSF_MAG_SIG PSF_INST_MAG PSF_INST_MAG_SIG AP_MAG AP_MAG_RAW PSF_MAJOR PSF_QF_PERFECT FLAGS FLAGS2 DIFF_NRATIO_BAD rsep 74 74 ---- o6157g0218o 75 00379 17.050 0.000 -12.215 0.011 -12.233 -12.237 6.610 0.999 0x06200005 0x00000080 0.0375 00379 17.050 0.000 -12.215 0.011 -12.233 -12.237 6.610 0.999 0x06200005 0x00000080 0.03 76 76 ---- o6157g0219o 77 77 00380 17.081 0.000 -12.181 0.011 -12.186 -12.191 6.376 0.999 0x06200005 0x00000080 0.02 … … 79 79 }}} 80 80 81 * psphot run with old ipp-20120802 tag: 81 * psphot run with old ipp-20120802 tag: similar to previous tag w/in ~0.01 but again exposure 0219 is largely offset 82 82 {{{ 83 83 ---- o6157g0218o … … 87 87 }}} 88 88 89 * psphot run with current ipp-20121026 tag using the same seed as the prior psphot run with ipp-20120802 tag: 89 * psphot run with current ipp-20121026 tag using the same seed as the prior psphot run with ipp-20120802 tag: with same seed, exposures mags match between tags, so appears something slightly more unstable in exposure 0219. (also doesn't match as well) 90 90 {{{ 91 91 ---- o6157g0218o … … 96 96 }}} 97 97 98 * psphot run with last year ipp-20110622 tag using the same seed as the prior psphot run with ipp-20120802 tag: 98 * psphot run with last year ipp-20110622 tag using the same seed as the prior psphot run with ipp-20120802 tag: again same AP_MAG but PSF_INST_MAG offset by ~0.01-0.02, flags for exposure 0218 also different. 99 99 {{{ 100 100 ---- o6157g0218o
