Changes between Version 8 and Version 9 of MOPS_trailed_psfs

Timestamp:

Oct 23, 2013, 4:08:08 PM (13 years ago)

Author:

watersc1

Comment:

--

MOPS_trailed_psfs

@@ -2 +2 @@
 
 == Comparison of ipp-20130712 and eam-branch-XXX ==
+
+After plotting the data from 2013-10-21, I wanted to check that my ipp-20130712 processing truly contained the changes that Gene had made to psphot.  To confirm this, I ran the test sample of trails using his test arrangement with both code branches.  As shown in the table below, the two versions produce effectively identical trail length results.
 
 || CMF file                  ||index|| ipp-tag L   || L_MOPS || difference   || eam-branch L  || L_MOPS || difference ||
@@ -43 +45 @@
 == ipp-20130712 trail test results ==
 
+Based on the check that the ipp-20130712 tag does contain the necessary psphot changes, I've compiled the list of flux/length/angle values for the 0010_trails_ground_truth.txt fit sample.  The following table contains the exposure/skycell values for the trails listed in this file, along with the index for extended fit objects around the expected location.  Following this are the flux/length/angle values.  The IPP angle data has been converted to degrees to match the MOPS values.  However, the odd distribution of IPP angle values suggests to me that the angle value recorded in the CMF file may not truly represent the same concept as the MOPS trail angle.
 
 || exp_name || skycell_id || index || flux_MOPS || flux_ipp || L_expect_MOPS || L_veres || L_ipp || angle_MOPS || angle_ipp ||