Changes between Version 62 and Version 63 of PS1_IPP_CzarLog_20120611

Timestamp:

Jun 14, 2012, 5:16:23 PM (14 years ago)

Author:

Mark Huber

Comment:

--

PS1_IPP_CzarLog_20120611

@@ -53 +53 @@
   * not sure which exposure is the cause (add here when traced out)
  * 07:55 Mark: looking into Larry report that about 1/3 of the OTAs in this diff pair (o6092g0331o and o6092g0348o) have no detections reported from them for MOPS.
-  * looks like not all skycells run for diffim, why? not in warpSkyCellMap, why? poor astrometry solution. why for this exposure and not one 17 later?
+  * looks like not all skycells run for diffim, why? not in warpSkyCellMap, why? poor astrometry solution. why for this exposure and not one 17 later? unclear, but is also seen to less of a degree in the following exposure as well. brief details from the log files:
+{{{
+-- gpc1/OSS.nt/2012/06/14/o6092g0331o.499070/o6092g0331o.499070.wrp.433383.log
+bad astrometric solution in header
+skipping XY01.hdr
+bad astrometric solution in header
+skipping XY02.hdr, XY03,04,05,06,10,11,12,13,14,16,17,21,23
+
+-- next exposure somewhat as poor -- gpc1/OSS.nt/2012/06/14/o6092g0332o.499069/o6092g0332o.499069.wrp.433393.log
+bad astrometric solution in header
+skipping XY16.hdr, XY17,35,36,47,57,61,63,76
+
+-- compared to later -- gpc1/OSS.nt/2012/06/14/o6092g0348o.499086/o6092g0348o.499086.wrp.433398.log
+bad astrometric solution in header
+skipping XY10.hdr, XY12,46,54,73
+
+
+}}}
  * 08:05 Mark: dropping old LAP stack that never ran
 {{{