Changes between Version 5 and Version 6 of PS1_IPP_Czarlog_20190524
- Timestamp:
- May 24, 2019, 4:09:47 PM (7 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
PS1_IPP_Czarlog_20190524
v5 v6 10 10 '''Czar Handover''' from JRF -> CCL 11 11 12 '''Updates''' 12 13 '''Updates''' 13 14 Updates still need doing, so far the last label is: {{{LAP.PV3.20140730.20150%}}}. 14 15 15 '' 'wait cleaning '''16 ''wait cleaning ''' 16 17 See last weeks handover notes. I've mostly been cleaning ones with the data_group {{{ThreePi.201%}}}, I think I started at 2018. 17 18 18 ''' general update cleaning '''19 ''' general update cleaning ''' 19 20 We've hit around 20k, so now would be a good time to clean up some chips. See last weeks handover notes 20 21 21 ''' ippx node power draw'''22 ''' ippx node power draw''' 22 23 As mentioned today there are still some power draw issues, choices are: 23 24 * monitor ippx node power usage while nightly processing is going on -> remove nodes from stdscience processing if the load is too high (the nodes appear to correspond to the PDU circuits descending on the page and descending on the ITC cabinet sheet -- I'll get Haydn to clarify). … … 28 29 If they look bad tell ps-obs and Ken, as they should be better than a week ago due to a new pointing model. 29 30 30 ''' PS2 pointing '''31 ''' PS2 pointing ''' 31 32 Watch out for very poor pointing, worth mentioning to people too and it may cause WSdiff issues in the morning (WSdiffs are currently only processed in the morning now). 32 33 33 34 34 ''' Euclid Bright Twi reprocess '''35 ''' Euclid Bright Twi reprocess ''' 35 36 There are some Euclid observations that have not been processed as they have a comment string with a different format (the config has now been changed so they should process automatically). The Euclid observations under the new format, and before the config change, will need to be reprocessed. See last weeks czar log for the command, and make sure the date in the chiptool command is the date are of the observation (compare with the previous Euclid bright twi observations that have been done before the comment change). 37 36 38 37 39
