Changes between Version 29 and Version 30 of PSNSC_NCU

Timestamp:

Oct 26, 2016, 12:15:00 AM (10 years ago)

Author:

Mark Huber

Comment:

--

PSNSC_NCU

@@ -108 +108 @@
  * WSdiff runs in ~ippmops/stdscience_ws with modified ipp-20141024 ops tag to make uncompressed WSdiffs (like FSS, PSNSC_MOPS)
   * larger volume, may need more nodes -- must be uncompressed for MOPS stamps since large data volume
-  * default detection @5-sigma while WWdiff is <5-sigma and may need to be adjusted -- default plan will be at normal 5-sigma level unless tuning agreed upon to a lower level (test chunk to be evaluated for this still) -- MD not a great equal comparison since exptimes were longer (but was also 5-sigma)
-
-  * [[html(<span style="color:red">[sc] Not sure if the catalog size is not going to explode if threshold too small. WWdiff is at 2.5-sigma(not sure?). What was the value for WSdiffs e.g. MDs? We could use the values (in each rgiz) unless something has changed. Not sure about what's used for w-band.</span>)]]
+  * default detection @5-sigma while WWdiff is <5-sigma (3.5) and may need to be adjusted -- default plan will be at normal 5-sigma level unless tuning agreed upon to a lower level  
+   * test chunk should be evaluated in more detail -- see below
+   * MD not a great equal comparison since exptimes were longer (but was also 5-sigma)
+   * [[html(<span style="color:red">[sc] Not sure if the catalog size is not going to explode if threshold too small. WWdiff is at 2.5-sigma(not sure?). What was the value for WSdiffs e.g. MDs? We could use the values (in each rgiz) unless something has changed. Not sure about what's used for w-band.</span>)]]
 
  * WSdiff published to IPP-MOPS-WS -- WWdiff possibly later to regular datastore IPP-MOPS-TEST
   * normal OSS warp-warp diffims will go to IPP-MOPS-TEST during the night
-
   * [[html(<span style="color:red">[sc] We will likely request WWdiff to be published to the regular datastore (IPP-MOPS-TEST) later (manual queuing/processing at the IPP level OK for MOPS)</span>)]]
 
@@ -138 +138 @@
 
 Tasks to do -- priority order now
- * verify w-band stacks okay along ecliptic for opposition end October -- new reference stacks to be made for the expected area (mix of reprocessing+updates to minimize data load)
- * WSdiff detection threshold -- 5-sigma default but may need to lower -- preliminary tests shows default 5-sigma should recover WWdiff threshold ~3.5 in MOPS test chunk
+ * verify w-band stacks okay along ecliptic for opposition end October -- 
+  * new reference stacks to be made for the expected area (mix of reprocessing+updates to minimize data load) -- NCU.ref.20161026 -- (add more details)
+ * WSdiff detection threshold -- 5-sigma default but may need to lower
+  * preliminary check of known sources shows default 5-sigma should recover ones with WWdiff threshold ~3.5 in MOPS test chunk --
  * MOPS interested in SSdiff -- published where?
- * check processing rate/nodes for WSdiffs -- during the night of observations -- likely the normal 3x c2 group is sufficient but will have some nodes available to boost as needed (more c2 and/or m0+1, x3?)
+ * check processing rate/nodes for WSdiffs -- during the night of observations -- likely the normal 3x c2 group is sufficient but will have some nodes available to boost as needed (more c2 and/or m0+1, x3?) -- only x2+3 available