Changes between Version 46 and Version 47 of SAS_MD04_IPPtoPSPS_testing.2011.11

Timestamp:

Dec 3, 2011, 5:32:57 PM (15 years ago)

Author:

Mark Huber

Comment:

--

SAS_MD04_IPPtoPSPS_testing.2011.11

@@ -21 +21 @@
  * stacks: SAS2.123 / SAS2.123.skycell.%.final.201107% + SAS2.123.synthcat / SAS2.123.synthcat.skycell.%.final.2011080% for z-band replacement -- for z-band, changed stackRun.label SAS2.123 to SAS2.123.poor_refcat with note
 
-
-''' --- Revised Version In Progress --- labels are now fixed. currently working through problem with destreak'''
+'''--- Revised SAS run ---''' ready
 
 Revised SAS.footprint.123: (full reprocessing of exposures chip->warp, stack, diff, DS) using the recent ipp-20111110 operations tag and LAP scripts to recover missing stacks (and any exposures) and uses the synthcat for all filters (like normal LAP processing) instead of just z-band as in the July run.
@@ -28 +27 @@
  * camera: SAS.footprint.123.rerun20111129 / SAS.footprint.123.20111129
  * stacks: SAS.footprint.123.rerun20111129 / SAS.footprint.123.skycell.%.final.1%
- * SAS.footprint exposures: 61 (13,12,12,12,12) vs 64 (16,12,12,12,12) in July run. 1 exposure not magicked (g-band)
- * SAS.footprint stacks: 314 (63,63,63,63,62) vs 315 (5x63) in July run but not all existed even though in stackRun table
+ * SAS.footprint exposures: 61 (13,12,12,12,12) vs 64 (16,12,12,12,12) in July run. 1 exposure not magicked (g-band) in rerun but used in all 63 of the stacks. should've been done with muti-diffs?
+ * SAS.footprint stacks: 314 (63,63,63,63,62) vs 315 (5x63) in July run but not all existed even though in stackRun table hence the rerun.
 
 Revised SAS2.123: (full reprocessing of exposures chip->warp, stack, diff, DS) using the recent ipp-20111110 operations tag and LAP scripts to recover missing stacks (and any exposures) and uses the synthcat for all filters (like normal LAP processing) instead of just z-band as in the July run.
@@ -35 +34 @@
  * camera: SAS2.123.rerun20111129 / SAS2.123.20111130
  * stacks: SAS2.123.rerun20111129 / SAS2.123.skycell.%.final.1%
- * SAS2.123 exposures: 620 (5x124) vs 568 (124,124,124,124,72) in July run. Some 28 exposures aren't magicked and aren't used in the stacks (except for 3 g-bands), unsure why.
- * SAS2.123 stacks: 1464 (282,287,283,330,282) vs ~1600? (400,400,400,400/327synth,400) in July run but not all existed even though in stackRun table
+ * SAS2.123 exposures: 620 (5x124) vs 568 (124,124,124,124,72) in July run. Some 28 rerun exposures aren't magicked and aren't used in the stacks (except for 3 g-bands), unsure why.
+ * SAS2.123 stacks: 1464 (282,287,283,330,282) vs ~1600? (400,400,400,400/327synth,400) in July run but not all existed even though in stackRun table hence the rerun
 
 Examples of changes with revised set: