Changes between Version 61 and Version 62 of SAS_MD04_IPPtoPSPS_testing.2011.11

Timestamp:

Dec 4, 2011, 11:14:01 AM (15 years ago)

Author:

Mark Huber

Comment:

--

SAS_MD04_IPPtoPSPS_testing.2011.11

@@ -26 +26 @@
 
  * camera: SAS.footprint.123.rerun20111129 / SAS.footprint.123.20111129
+  * SAS.footprint exposures: 61 (13,12,12,12,12) vs 64 (16,12,12,12,12) in July run. 1 exposure not magicked (g-band) in rerun but used in all 63 of the stacks (6 unmagicked in the July run). should've been done with muti-diffs?
  * stacks: SAS.footprint.123.rerun20111129 / SAS.footprint.123.skycell.%.final.1%
- * SAS.footprint exposures: 61 (13,12,12,12,12) vs 64 (16,12,12,12,12) in July run. 1 exposure not magicked (g-band) in rerun but used in all 63 of the stacks (6 unmagicked in the July run). should've been done with muti-diffs?
- * SAS.footprint stacks: 314 (63,63,63,63,62) vs 315 (5x63) in July run but not all existed even though in stackRun table (only 41 in g-band) hence the rerun.
+  * SAS.footprint stacks: 314 (63,63,63,63,62) vs 315 (5x63) in July run but not all existed even though in stackRun table (only 41 in g-band) hence the rerun.
 
 Revised SAS2.123: (full reprocessing of exposures chip->warp, stack, diff, DS) using the recent ipp-20111110 operations tag and LAP scripts to recover missing stacks (and any exposures) and uses the synthcat for all filters (like normal LAP processing) instead of just z-band as in the July run.
 
  * camera: SAS2.123.rerun20111129 / SAS2.123.20111130
+  * SAS2.123 exposures: 620 (5x124) vs 568 (124,124,124,124,72) in July run. Some 28 rerun exposures aren't magicked and aren't used in the stacks (except for 3 g-bands), unsure why (54 from July).
  * stacks: SAS2.123.rerun20111129 / SAS2.123.skycell.%.final.1%
- * SAS2.123 exposures: 620 (5x124) vs 568 (124,124,124,124,72) in July run. Some 28 rerun exposures aren't magicked and aren't used in the stacks (except for 3 g-bands), unsure why (54 from July).
- * SAS2.123 stacks: 1464 (282,287,283,330,282) vs ~1900? (400,400,400,400/327synth,400) in July run but not all existed even though in stackRun table (353,400,400,272,395 actual and not quickstack) hence the rerun. rerun seems to have a large % of stacks properly missing/not made though, some edges/overlaps some center tessellation (i.e., 1405.074,75,76).
+  * SAS2.123 stacks: 1464 (282,287,283,330,282) vs ~1900? (400,400,400,400/327synth,400) in July run but not all existed even though in stackRun table (353,400,400,272,395 actual and not quickstack) hence the rerun. rerun seems to have a large % of stacks properly missing/not made though, some edges/overlaps some center tessellation (i.e., 1405.074,75,76).
 
 Examples of changes with revised set: