Changes between Version 33 and Version 34 of STS.refstack.20120510

Timestamp:

Jun 11, 2012, 3:56:50 PM (14 years ago)

Author:

Mark Huber

Comment:

--

STS.refstack.20120510

@@ -206 +206 @@
  * skycell.1.03 chosen being on outer edge without large masking fraction and for comparison in possible overlap tests with other projection (PP4)
 
+-- need to pick skycell for test Nin with, probably outer edge w/o overlap or one with large mask chunks
+*** actually doing an overlap skycell would be useful to see how much degraded/messed up when extra is added both in overlap AND in different spatial regions, but for that would need a corner -- but in 1. the corner 1.01 is like 1.66 -- so want to avoid the corner then and do bottom edge 1.04,1.05 where good_frac ~50%, 1.05 has larger static mask to watch in rotations -- 1.03 also should work and seems more stable static and good frac
+--> should look at mask frac but also Ndet on the stack to track
+ select warpRun.warp_id,warpSkyfile.skycell_id,warpSkyfile.maskfrac_npix,warpSkyfile.maskfrac_static,warpSkyfile.maskfrac_dynamic,warpSkyfile.maskfrac_advisory,warpSkyfile.good_frac from warpRun join warpSkyfile using (warp_id) where label like "STS.refstack.20120510" and skycell_id like "%1.%" limit 1;
+*** need a sample camera image to know where large masking regions are -- with proxy can view, 1.03 should work well
+--> how about a multi-cover one? 
+
+
+
 {{{
 stacktool -definebyquery -dbname gpc1 -set_dist_group NULL -set_data_group STS.reftest.20120510.c1f39 -set_label STS.reftest.20120510 -set_workdir neb://@HOST@.0/gpc1/STS.reftest.20120510 -select_data_group STS.refstack.20120510 -select_good_frac_min 0.05 -min_num 2 -select_fwhm_major_max 3.9 -select_elong_max 1.2 -set_reduction PS1_REFERENCE -simple -select_skycell_id skycell.1.03  >& stacktool.sts_reftest.20120510.fwhm39_elong12_skycell103.log
@@ -217 +226 @@
 gpc1/STS.reftest.20120510/STS.V4/skycell.1.03/STS.V4.skycell.1.03.stk.899920.unconv.num.fits -- c0f45 (max inputs 44)
 
---> input stats for likely FWHM cut
+--> input stats for likely FWHM cut, 
 SELECT exp_id,exp_time,dateobs,zpt_obs,zpt_stdev,fwhm_major,format(fwhm_major/fwhm_minor,3) as elong,format(iq_fwhm_major/iq_fwhm_minor,3) as iq_elong,format(fwhm_major-iq_fwhm_major,2) as fwhm_iq_maj,format(camProcessedExp.bg,2) as bg,format(camProcessedExp.bg_stdev,2) as bg_stdev,format(fwhm_major_uq,2) as uq,format(fwhm_major_lq,2) as lq,n_stars,comment FROM rawExp join chipRun using (exp_id) join camRun using (chip_id) join camProcessedExp using (cam_id) join fakeRun using (cam_id) join warpRun using (fake_id) join stackInputSkyfile using (warp_id) join stackRun using (stack_id) WHERE stackRun.data_group like "STS.reftest.20120510.c1f38" group by exp_id;
 
@@ -246 +255 @@
 | 393835 |       20 | 2011-09-18 09:13:19 | 24.5271 |  0.027369 |    3.75097 | 1.157 | 1.076    | 0.99        | 103.99 | 13.49    | 4.07 | 3.47 | 8624396 | STS.000.GIQ PP1 dither 1 | 
 
+--> cuts out a larger fraction of the center position
+
+--> compared to log file for ppStack -- gpc1/STS.reftest.20120510/STS.V4/skycell.1.03/STS.V4.skycell.1.03.stk.899918.log
+      Input 0: 3.137970
+      Input 1: 3.397691
+      Input 2: 3.309175
+      Input 3: 3.310735
+      Input 4: 3.114384
+      Input 5: 3.043151
+      Input 6: 3.346249
+      Input 7: 3.141845
+      Input 8: 3.471485
+      Input 9: 3.238341
+      Input 10: 3.433451
+      Input 11: 3.225220
+      Input 12: 4.423095
+      Input 13: 4.086733
+      Input 14: 4.282342
+      Input 15: 4.067309
+      Input 16: 3.030721
+      Input 17: 4.047925
+      Input 18: 4.245076
+      Input 19: 4.328331
+      Input 20: 4.284031
+      Input 21: 4.074796
+      Input 22: 4.197470
+      Input FWHMs : 3.662502 +/- 0.504006
+          fit ext:   0.965282 sec for 225 of 225 sources
+          fit psf:   0.342076 sec for 196 of 225 sources
+        apresid: 0.046344 +/- 0.000000 (systematic error) from statistics of 225 psf stars (196 used)
+        chisq vs flux fit term 0: 0.000000 +/- 0.000000
+        chisq vs flux fit term 1: 0.000000 +/- 0.000000
+      try model PS_MODEL_PS1_V1, ap-fit: 0.046344 +/- 0.000000 : sky bias: 0.000000
+      Target seeing FWHM: 4.430518
+...
+        fwhm (psf): 4.472250,4.366182 (moments): 0.000000,0.000000
+
+--> even for c1f37 has FWHM>4.2 going into it -- gpc1/STS.reftest.20120510/STS.V4/skycell.1.03/STS.V4.skycell.1.03.stk.899919.log
+
 }}}
 
 psphot on samples, unconvolved and convolved (compare to ppStack log file):
  * faults because of recent modified psphot config/code to limit peaks and so faults.. need to add -Di PEAKS_NMAX_TOTAL 60000
- * unconvolved stacks still faulting.. so do PASS1 only -D BREAK_POINT PASS1. Convolved ones are poor, FWHM_MAJ~9-10? 
+ * unconvolved stacks still faulting.. so do PASS1 only -D BREAK_POINT PASS1. Convolved ones are poor, FWHM_MAJ~9-10??
 
 {{{
@@ -266 +314 @@
 
 
-Summary of test runs:
+Summary of test runs for skycell.1.03:
 || || || || ||
 || '''version data_group''' (stack_id) || '''filter''' || '''skycell input warps (rej)''' || '''skycell FWHM (major) conv/unconv''' || 
 || || || || ||
-|| new ''STS.refstack.20120510'' V4  || i || 96 (2) || 1.27/" ||
+|| new ''STS.refstack.20120510'' V4  || i || 61 (2) || 1.27/" ||
 || || || || ||
-|| STS.reftest.20120510.c1f39 V4  (899917) || i || () || 1.10/0.98"  ||
-|| STS.reftest.20120510.c1f38 V4  (899918) || i || () || 1.09/0.95"  ||
-|| STS.reftest.20120510.c1f37 V4  (899919) || i ||  () || 1.05/0.96"  ||
-|| STS.reftest.20120510.c0f45 V4  (899920) || i ||  () || 1.14/0.97"  ||
+|| STS.reftest.20120510.c1f39 V4  (899917) || i || 36 (0) || 1.10/0.98"  ||
+|| STS.reftest.20120510.c1f38 V4  (899918) || i || 34 (0) || 1.09/0.95"  ||
+|| STS.reftest.20120510.c1f37 V4  (899919) || i || 12 (0) || 1.05/0.96"  ||
+|| STS.reftest.20120510.c0f45 V4  (899920) || i || 44 (0) || 1.14/0.97"  ||
 || || || || ||
-|| old STS.refstack.20110615 V3  || i || 78 (4) || 1.45/" ||
+|| old STS.refstack.20110613 V3  || i || 68 (0) || 1.45/" ||
 || || || || ||