| 206 | | * skycell.1.03 chosen being on outer edge without large masking fraction and for comparison in possible overlap tests with other projection (PP4) |
| 207 | | |
| 208 | | -- need to pick skycell for test Nin with, probably outer edge w/o overlap or one with large mask chunks |
| 209 | | *** actually doing an overlap skycell would be useful to see how much degraded/messed up when extra is added both in overlap AND in different spatial regions, but for that would need a corner -- but in 1. the corner 1.01 is like 1.66 -- so want to avoid the corner then and do bottom edge 1.04,1.05 where good_frac ~50%, 1.05 has larger static mask to watch in rotations -- 1.03 also should work and seems more stable static and good frac |
| 210 | | --> should look at mask frac but also Ndet on the stack to track |
| 211 | | select warpRun.warp_id,warpSkyfile.skycell_id,warpSkyfile.maskfrac_npix,warpSkyfile.maskfrac_static,warpSkyfile.maskfrac_dynamic,warpSkyfile.maskfrac_advisory,warpSkyfile.good_frac from warpRun join warpSkyfile using (warp_id) where label like "STS.refstack.20120510" and skycell_id like "%1.%" limit 1; |
| 212 | | *** need a sample camera image to know where large masking regions are -- with proxy can view, 1.03 should work well |
| 213 | | --> how about a multi-cover one? |
| 214 | | |
| 215 | | |
| 216 | | |
| | 206 | * skycell.1.03 chosen being on outer edge without large masking fraction or chunks and for comparison in possible overlap tests with other projection (PP4) |
| | 207 | * overlap skycell would be useful to see how much it becomes degraded when added both in overlap and in different spatial regions. for now that would need a corner. |
| | 208 | * in projection 1, the corner 1.01 is like 1.66. look at maskfrac and also Ndetections on the stack |
| | 209 | {{{ |
| | 210 | select warpRun.warp_id,warpSkyfile.skycell_id,warpSkyfile.maskfrac_npix,warpSkyfile.maskfrac_static,warpSkyfile.maskfrac_dynamic,warpSkyfile.maskfrac_advisory,warpSkyfile.good_frac from warpRun join warpSkyfile using (warp_id) where label like "STS.refstack.20120510" and skycell_id like "%1.%" limit 10; |
| | 211 | |
| | 212 | | warp_id | skycell_id | maskfrac_npix | maskfrac_static | maskfrac_dynamic | maskfrac_advisory | good_frac | |
| | 213 | +---------+--------------+---------------+-----------------+------------------+-------------------+-----------+ |
| | 214 | | 409624 | skycell.1.00 | 37519776 | 0.07579 | 8e-06 | 0.006282 | 0.044258 | |
| | 215 | | 409624 | skycell.1.01 | 37519776 | 0.27474 | 6.3e-05 | 0.094433 | 0.46227 | |
| | 216 | | 409624 | skycell.1.02 | 37519776 | 0.134148 | 8.4e-05 | 0.129784 | 0.571464 | |
| | 217 | | 409624 | skycell.1.03 | 37519776 | 0.067499 | 9.8e-05 | 0.144948 | 0.631332 | |
| | 218 | | 409624 | skycell.1.04 | 37519776 | 0.101891 | 0.000159 | 0.140317 | 0.595121 | |
| | 219 | | 409624 | skycell.1.05 | 37519776 | 0.140644 | 0.000259 | 0.158277 | 0.565971 | |
| | 220 | | 409624 | skycell.1.06 | 37519776 | 0.284199 | 0.000173 | 0.115242 | 0.450413 | |
| | 221 | | 409624 | skycell.1.07 | 37519776 | 0.076937 | 1.3e-05 | 0.010954 | 0.043497 | |
| | 222 | | 409624 | skycell.1.08 | 37519776 | 0.336794 | 8e-05 | 0.087179 | 0.445569 | |
| | 223 | | 409624 | skycell.1.09 | 37519776 | 0.370852 | 0.000146 | 0.119304 | 0.519711 | |
| | 224 | |
| | 225 | ---> want to avoid the corner then and do bottom edge 1.04,1.05 where good_frac ~50%, 1.05 has larger static mask to watch in rotations. 1.03 also should work and seems more stable static and good maskfrac. |
| | 226 | }}} |
| | 227 | |
| | 228 | |
| | 229 | * initial test sample: |