Changes between Version 36 and Version 37 of STS.refstack.20120510

Timestamp:

Jun 11, 2012, 5:28:28 PM (14 years ago)

Author:

Mark Huber

Comment:

--

STS.refstack.20120510

@@ -2 +2 @@
 [[PageOutline]]
 
-MOPS would like a refstack for the STS fields to do warp-stack diffims.
-
-The previous STS.refstack.20110613,20110615 wasn't usable as it was destroyed by magic.
-
-STS.20120510 was made using a similar number of inputs from the best exposures from 2011. Not pretty but hopefully sufficient.
+MOPS would like a refstack for the STS fields in order to get warp-stack diffims. The previous STS.refstack.20110613,20110615 wasn't usable as it was destroyed by magic. STS.20120510 was made using a similar number of inputs from the best exposures from 2011. Not pretty but hopefully sufficient.
 
 Status:
@@ -19 +15 @@
 
 
-Details to add:
- * FWHM of test stacks (STS.reftest.20120510.c#f#) like done with MD refstacks
- * samole unconv vs convolved stacks and issues found
- * test diffims faults, details and issues with recent STS data
-
-
-
+
+Things to do/fix/test:
+ * convolved versus unconvolved stack diffims
+ * target PSF limiting 
+ * skycell overlap in refstack and diffims - want to restrict inputs PP1 into stack skycell.1.xx only etc
+  * can remake with clean/updates for each field, but maybe MOPS won't care or maybe with conv stacks isn't a big issue?
+  * tricky to do in an automated way. giving each field a different refstack processing label is easiest and do on update? will still try to populate other regions though, so need to restrict to particular region with -skycell_id. won't need a sub-label for each 7 to prevent the rerun headache and to only run against proper field since matched by skycell in diffim.
+ *
 = STS observation and tessellation summary =