IPP Software Navigation Tools IPP Links Communication Pan-STARRS Links

Changes between Version 5 and Version 6 of VYSOS5.20091011


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Oct 22, 2009, 5:02:22 PM (17 years ago)
Author:
eugene
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • VYSOS5.20091011

    v5 v6  
    7373Initially, I was going to have the processing read from /home/ipp/alldata/... and write results to /home/ipp/data/process.  However, it turns out that the directory 'alldata' is a simlink to /drobopro, which is in turn an HFS+ device.  Without a lot of work, I cannot NFS mount an HFS+ device on the fruitbowl machines.  I decided it would be easier to just copy the data that was going to be processed to /home/ipp/data/rawdata/... and update the database.  I defined path://RAWCOPY to point at the new location, and wrote a script (vysosdata1:~ipp/workdir/relocate.ic348) to copy the data and modify the database.  Although the script has the ic348 in the name, it will work for any data associated with a labeled chipRun.
    7474
    75 2009.10.22: I needed to update the vysos5 database to bring it up to date with recent code changes.  But, there seems to have been a recent change to the fruitbowl libraries which broke my IPP build.  The IC348 data is processed to chip, but I cannot start camera until this gets fixed.
     752009.10.22: I needed to update the vysos5 database to bring it up to date with recent code changes.  But, there seems to have been a recent change to the fruitbowl libraries which broke my IPP build.  The IC348 data is processed to chip, but I cannot start camera until this gets fixed. '''update''' Gavin fixed this, and I was able to restart the camera analysis.  It proceeded fine, though it required enlarging the astrometry guess region to ~1 CCD field since the pointing is apparently all over the place.
    7676
     77I uploaded ~144 resulting smf files into a DVO database on pikake, and explored the photometry a bit.  I ran psphot on the database to calibrate out the transparency variations.  It seems the photometry is not great -- the aperture magnitudes have better stability than the PSF magnitudes.  This may mean I should be using a different PSF functional form, or perhaps I do not allow enough PSF variation.
     78
     79
     80