| | 130 | I am rechecking with P2 batch B00136491, this uses new addstar / new dvo / new calibration (compared to the above example, which was Gene's SAS35) |
| | 131 | |
| | 132 | Numbers look much better: |
| | 133 | * FrameMeta = ok! |
| | 134 | * ImageMeta |
| | 135 | * magSat =0 |
| | 136 | * completMag =0 |
| | 137 | * psfModelID = -999 |
| | 138 | * Detection |
| | 139 | * posAngle is filled |
| | 140 | * extNSigma = -999 |
| | 141 | * zp doesn't look so funky |
| | 142 | * psfMajorFWHM/psfMinorFWHM are filled properly |
| | 143 | * psfCore filled properly |
| | 144 | * apFlux/ApFluxErr/appFillF filled properly |
| | 145 | |
| | 146 | Here is a plot of zp for this exposure, I think it looks ok: |
| | 147 | |
| | 148 | [[Image(zpfor136491.png)]] |