Changes between Version 155 and Version 156 of ppStack_testing_201111

Timestamp:

Jun 28, 2012, 4:10:22 PM (14 years ago)

Author:

Mark Huber

Comment:

--

ppStack_testing_201111

@@ -800 +800 @@
  * PSF.INPUT.CLIP.NSIGMA 2.0 (or 1.0?)
 
+Nightly stacks (primarily MD concerned) have NAN for PSF.INPUT.MAX and so is not set. If the night is decent, should be similar and minor issue (should get stats on though TBT)
+
 Chris quickly looked at the FWHM of the exposures going into LAP stacks and order 90 percentile are <8 pixels. The NSIGMA is more difficult to quantify, so the general question is do we want to just help trim off more of the poorest inputs to keep the convolved target PSF more regular or be much more restrictive to improve the convolved target PSF at the cost of the number of inputs (maybe 10-30% at times for NSIGMA of 1). Any additional exclusion cuts include images that go into making the unconvolved stack as well.