| 384 | | * if FWHM cut >7.5 pixels, why is target selected >7.5? Are input images not being rejected? Somewhat part of next section on Target PSF, but need to trace out here. Could split up 400 set into subgroups and run, looks like rejected are not being used but is growing itself in converting to the PSF.MODEL PS_MODEL_PS1_V1. |
| 385 | | * s055g - rerun in smaller sub-sets ~100, target is ~9.45 and has similar output. Limiting input FWHM <7.1 selects a target ~8.4. rejection for >7.5 is active. |
| 386 | | * s055r - appears to have a problem, the convolved images are poor and many are rejected. Target PSF is in some way not representative? 100 input subsets seem to not show this problem. |
| 387 | | * s055i - largest growth still from target to final stack (~2 pixels) |
| 388 | | * generally would be helpful to have other stats, at least min/max inputs |
| | 384 | * if FWHM cut >7.5 pixels, why is target selected >7.5? Are input images not being rejected? Somewhat part of next section on Target PSF, but need to trace out here. Could split up 400 set into subgroups and run. Looks like rejected are not being used but is growing itself in converting to the PSF.MODEL PS_MODEL_PS1_V1 or just in the envelope itself to include some wacky IQ images. |
| | 385 | * s055g - rerun in smaller sub-sets ~100, target is ~9.45 and has similar output. Limiting input FWHM <7.1 selects a target ~8.4. rejection for >7.5 is active. The large target PSF looks to be trying to account for inputs with odd IQ in the envelope calculation and will need to collect stats on the input images for comparison. |
| | 386 | * s055r - appears to have a problem, the convolved images are poor and many are rejected. Target PSF is in some way not representative? 100 input subsets seem to not show this problem. Wacky bug, see pmReadoutFake footprint/stamp radius typecast to not 0.0 in threading. |
| | 387 | * s055i - largest growth still from target to final stack (~2 pixels). The target image PSF is ~7 pixels as says, however all the convolved input images are 9-11 pixels. Rerunning this and see if can reproduce. |
| | 388 | * generally would be helpful to have other stats, at least min/max inputs on the envelope/target PSF calculation. |
