| | 1 | I tested the object detection efficiency of psphot by running psphot |
| | 2 | on a number of images supplied by Jim: |
| | 3 | |
| | 4 | 1) ps1_i_sub.fits/ps1_i_sub_mask.fits/ps1_i_sub_wts.fits |
| | 5 | |
| | 6 | This image was a composite mosaic Jim put together from four MD04 |
| | 7 | reference stack frames. This composite mosaic does not include the |
| | 8 | covariance information from the original stacks, which clearly impacts |
| | 9 | the object detection. The CMF from this run has 7884 PSF objects |
| | 10 | (5658 with non NULL PSF_INST_MAG), and 1354 xsrc objects. The image |
| | 11 | with non-NULL mag PSF objects overplotted shows a number of missed |
| | 12 | objects along with faint objects and objects that do not appear real. |
| | 13 | |
| | 14 | [[Image(image1.png)]] |
| | 15 | |
| | 16 | 2) i_sdss_sub.fits/i_sdss_sub.mask.fits/i_sdss_sub.var.fits |
| | 17 | |
| | 18 | This is another composite mosaic of SDSS images. The original images |
| | 19 | had no covariance information, so it is not lost during this |
| | 20 | processing. The CMF from this run has 712 PSF objects, all of which |
| | 21 | have non-NULL PSF_INST_MAG, and 169 xsrc objects. All objects |
| | 22 | detected in this image appear to be real, and there are only a few |
| | 23 | cases where a real-looking object is not detected. |
| | 24 | |
| | 25 | [[Image(image2.png)]] |
| | 26 | |
| | 27 | |
| | 28 | 3) subaru_ip_064_sci_20.fits/subaru_ip_064_sci_20.mk.fits/subaru_ip_064_sci_20.wt.fits |
| | 29 | |
| | 30 | This is a deep Subaru image with mask and variance created by setting |
| | 31 | the mask to all zero (accept all pixels) and the variance image equal |
| | 32 | to VAR = SCI + 21.19**2, where 21.19 is a quick estimate of the image |
| | 33 | noise. The CMF contains 2015 PSF objects (1989 with not-NULL |
| | 34 | PSF_INST_MAG) and 25 xsrc objects. The low number is almost certainly |
| | 35 | due to the poor variance image model, which excludes the majority of |
| | 36 | the faintest objects. |
| | 37 | |
| | 38 | [[Image(image3.png)]] |
| | 39 | |
| | 40 | |
| | 41 | 4) MD04.V2.skycell.078.stk.179047.unconv.fits/MD04.V2.skycell.078.stk.179047.unconv.mask.fits/MD04.V2.skycell.078.stk.179047.unconv.wt.fits |
| | 42 | |
| | 43 | This is one of the raw MD04 reference stack frames used in the mosaic |
| | 44 | above. This retains the covariance information, and the associated |
| | 45 | CMF file shows a much better correspondance between image and detected |
| | 46 | objects. The CMF has 16417 PSF objects (16212 with non-NULL |
| | 47 | PSF_INST_MAG) and 1276 xsrc objects. Although there are a large |
| | 48 | number of detections, the majority appear to associate with very faint |
| | 49 | objects. |
| | 50 | |
| | 51 | [[Image(image4.png)]] |
| | 52 | |
| | 53 | 5) subaru/MD04 unconv comparison |
| | 54 | |
| | 55 | To check how many of the objects detected in the MD04 reference stack |
| | 56 | correspond to real faint objects, the detection list from #4 was |
| | 57 | overlaid on the image from #3. Although there are some detections |
| | 58 | that do not associate with real objects on this deeper image, it does |
| | 59 | appear that the majority of the faint detections from #4 are real. |
| | 60 | |
| | 61 | [[Image(image5.png)]] |