IPP Software Navigation Tools IPP Links Communication Pan-STARRS Links

Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of psphot_extended_source_fit


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Sep 5, 2013, 2:59:42 PM (13 years ago)
Author:
bills
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • psphot_extended_source_fit

    v1 v1  
     1= psphot Extended Source Fit Testing =
     2
     3This page discusses some experiments where we ran psphot on simulated images to test recent improvements to the
     4psphot extended source fitting.
     5
     6The 40 simulated images were provided last year by Peter Draper for use in testing the psphot kron radius and magnitude
     7code. They were constructed using E Bertin's SkyMaker program.
     8
     9The objects of interest are simulated galaxies which are described by the following parameters
     10
     11{{{
     12  - x y   centre of object in pixels
     13  - mag   total magnitude
     14  - bt    build/disk ratio
     15  - br    bulge effective radii (half light arcsec)
     16  - bi    bulge inclination (always 1 in this sample)
     17  - ba    bulge position angle
     18  - dl    disk scale length (arcsec)
     19  - di    disk inclincation (always 1 in this sample)
     20  - da    disk position angle
     21  - z     redshift
     22  - ht    hubble type  (10 for pure disks, -6 for pure bulges)
     23}}}
     24
     25These images were run though psphot using the STACKPHOT recipe. The parameters for the set of sources psphot selected for extended source fitting were
     26matched by coordinates to the list of simulated galaxies. In the following sections we examine the fits for the 3 different models.
     27We concentrate mostly on the simple galaxy models, pure disks (exponential profile) and and pure bulges (de Vaucouleur 1/4 profile).
     28
     29== Sersic Model ==
     30
     31{{{
     32    I(r) = I(0) exp[ -k * R ** (1 / m) ]
     33
     34psphot extended source parameters meausred
     35   EXT_INST_MAG
     36   EXT_WIDTH_MAJ
     37   EXT_WIDTH_MIN
     38   EXT_THETA
     39   EXT_PAR_07       (0.5 / m)
     40}}}
     41
     42Since all of the simulated galaxes in this sample have bulge inclination == 1 and disk inclination == 1,
     43the major an minor axes should be equal and the angle will
     44unmeasurable due to noise.
     45
     46=== Magnitude ==
     47
     48The difference between the simulated galaxy's magnitude and the sersic fit magnitude is shown in the following plot
     49
     50