Changes between Version 19 and Version 20 of stacking_coverage.20130307
- Timestamp:
- Apr 23, 2013, 10:38:11 AM (13 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
stacking_coverage.20130307
v19 v20 13 13 14 14 * Q1: "One good test to see if everything is propagated correctly is to check the noise" 15 * A1: I chose six horizontal stripes across the image, and calculated the image noise and variance median for each 100-pixel tall sample (partially because I have that code done and easy to use). To remove the effects of stars (which appear as horizontal excursions in the following plot), I used the median absolute deviation as the image noise statistic, converted in the plot to a Gaussian sigma. The variance image was measured using a simple median. No covariance term was applied, although a quick by-eye estimate suggests a covariance term of ~1.1. 15 * A1: I chose six horizontal stripes across the image, and calculated the image noise and variance median for each 100-pixel tall sample (partially because I have that code done and easy to use). To remove the effects of stars (which appear as horizontal excursions in the following plot), I used the median absolute deviation as the image noise statistic, converted in the plot to a Gaussian sigma. The variance image was measured using a simple median. No covariance term was applied, although a quick by-eye estimate suggests a covariance term of ~1.1. Each horizontal stripe sample is offset from the previous by 200 counts on both axes to reduce the confusion of overlaps. 16 16 17 17 [[Image(stacking_noise_match.png)]]
