Changes between Version 29 and Version 30 of stacking_coverage.20130307

Timestamp:

Apr 24, 2013, 5:14:59 PM (13 years ago)

Author:

watersc1

Comment:

--

stacking_coverage.20130307

@@ -1 +1 @@
 == 2013-04-24 ==
+
+=== Conclusion ===
+
+I believe the unrestricted reduction is the one we accept.  There is an increase in the target PSF FWHM relative to the stricter standard reduction, although it is not significantly worse than the current analysis.  There is a gain in image depth in some areas, and that translates into higher S/N for the majority of objects.
+
+The only remaining test I would like to do is to process a deep stack that has difficulties with the target PSF to determine if these changes help those stacks as well.  Optimally, if that deep stack is subjected to the excess detection bug, this deep stack test could evaluate both simultaneously.
+
+=== Tests ===
 
 The following images review the statistics for the SAS g.00000 data in four processings:
@@ -29 +37 @@
 [[Image(SNrat_hist.png,600px)]]
 
-=== Conclusion ===
-
-I believe the unrestricted reduction is the one we accept.  There is an increase in the target PSF FWHM relative to the stricter standard reduction, although it is not significantly worse than the current analysis.  There is a gain in image depth in some areas, and that translates into higher S/N for the majority of objects.
-
-The only remaining test I would like to do is to process a deep stack that has difficulties with the target PSF to determine if these changes help those stacks as well.  Optimally, if that deep stack is subjected to the excess detection bug, this deep stack test could evaluate both simultaneously.
 == 2013-04-23 ==