Changes between Version 37 and Version 38 of stacking_coverage.20130307

Timestamp:

Apr 28, 2013, 9:47:21 PM (13 years ago)

Author:

watersc1

Comment:

--

stacking_coverage.20130307

@@ -18 +18 @@
 ||               || MDtest                 || 445 || 396 || 8.993 || [[Image(i061comp.jpg,200px)]] || [[Image(i061comp_var.png,300px)]] ||
 
-False positives:
-
-|| skycell.027 y || [[Image(y027_fp.png,400px)]] ||
-|| skycell.055 i || [[Image(i055_fp.png,400px)]] ||
-|| skycell.041 i || [[Image(i041_fp.png,400px)]] ||
-|| skycell.061 i || [[Image(i061_fp.png,400px)]] ||
+False positives:  I matched the detection list from running psphot on the unconvolved stacks against a set of SDSS stripe 82 sources (constructed by Nigel).  I then declared all unmatched detections as false positives, and plotted the magnitude distribution of those as well as all objects with those detections subtracted.  This does set a detection limit based on the SDSS data.  However, the new stacks have fewer unmatched detections than the previous, especially in the two fields that had bad combinations in the previous stacks.
+
+|| field         || False Positives              || All detections - FP ||
+|| skycell.027 y || [[Image(y027_fp.png,400px)]] || [[Image(y027_fpdepth.png,400px)]] ||
+|| skycell.055 i || [[Image(i055_fp.png,400px)]] || [[Image(i055_fpdepth.png,400px)]] ||
+|| skycell.041 i || [[Image(i041_fp.png,400px)]] || [[Image(i041_fpdepth.png,400px)]] ||
+|| skycell.061 i || [[Image(i061_fp.png,400px)]] || [[Image(i061_fpdepth.png,400px)]] ||
 
 == 2013-04-24 ==