- Timestamp:
- Sep 7, 2010, 9:16:10 AM (16 years ago)
- Location:
- branches/eam_branches/ipp-20100823
- Files:
-
- 2 edited
-
. (modified) (1 prop)
-
psphot/doc/notes.20100715.txt (modified) (1 diff)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
branches/eam_branches/ipp-20100823
-
branches/eam_branches/ipp-20100823/psphot/doc/notes.20100715.txt
r29004 r29124 1 2 2010.08.24 3 4 Remaining work to be done: 5 6 * test and turn on CR masking 7 * double-check source size analysis: 8 * are we doing the right thing with sources flagged as bad in 'rough'? 9 * are we doing the right thing for SAT, CR, EXT, PSF after SourceSize? 10 * convert CR_SIGMA and EXT_SIGMA to probabilities 11 * example results of model fits vs fake inputs 12 * what is the right solution for the stack PSF photometry? 13 * Nigel sees 4-6% 14 * we see 1.9% at the worst 15 * non-poisson errors are clearly better -- check on the chisq values 16 * why is QGAUSS so good for the one example (better for poisson, if trendy) 1 17 2 18 2010.08.12
Note:
See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.
