IPP Software Navigation Tools IPP Links Communication Pan-STARRS Links

Ignore:
Timestamp:
Dec 13, 2016, 4:35:04 PM (10 years ago)
Author:
watersc1
Message:

Added mask fraction table and paper series introduction paragraph.

File:
1 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • trunk/doc/release.2015/ps1.detrend/detrend.tex

    r39852 r39853  
    125125%% http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?2007ASPC..364..153M&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf
    126126\section{Introduction and Survey Description}
     127
     128This is the third in a series of seven papers describing the Pan-STARRS1
     129Surveys,
     130the data reduction techiques and the resulting data products. This paper (Paper III)
     131describes the details of the pixel processing algorithms, including
     132detrending, warping, and adding (to create stacked images) and subtracting
     133(to create difference images) and resulting image products and their
     134properties.
     135\citet[][Paper I]{chambers2017} provides an overview of the Pan-STARRS System, the
     136design and execution of the Surveys, the resulting image and catalog data
     137products, a discussion of the overall data quality and basic
     138characteristics, and a brief summary of important results.
     139%Magnier et al. 2017 (Paper II)
     140%Pan-STARRS Data Processing Stages
     141\citet[][Paper II]{magnier2017c}
     142describes how the various data processing stages are organised and
     143implemented
     144in the Imaging Processing Pipeline (IPP), including details of the
     145the processing database which is a critical element in the IPP
     146infrastructure.
     147%Waters et al. 2017 (Paper III)
     148%Pan-STARRS Pixel Processing : Detrending, Warping, Stacking
     149%\citet[][Paper III]{waters2017}
     150%Magnier et al. 2017 (Paper IV)
     151%Pan-STARRS Pixel Analysis : Source Detection
     152\citet[][Paper IV]{magnier2017a}
     153describes the details of the source detection and photometry, including
     154point-spread-function and extended source fitting models, and the
     155techniques for ``forced'' photometry measurements.
     156%Magnier et al. 2017 (Paper V)
     157%Pan-STARRS Photometric and Astrometric Calibration
     158\citet[][Paper V]{magnier2017b}
     159describes the final calibration process, and the resulting photometric and
     160astrometric quality.
     161The Pan-STARRS1 filters and photometric system has already been described
     162in detail in \cite{2012ApJ...750...99T}.
     163%Flewelling et al. 2017 (Paper VI)
     164%Pan-STARRS 1 Database and Data Products
     165\citet[][Paper VI]{flewelling2017}
     166describes  the details of the resulting catalog data and its organization
     167in the Pan-STARRS database.
     168%
     169%
     170\citet[][Paper VII]{huber2017}
     171%Huber et al. 2017 (Paper VII)
     172describes the Medium Deep Survey in detail, including the unique issues and
     173data products specific to that survey. The Medium Deep Survey is not part
     174of Data Release 1. (DR1)
    127175
    128176
     
    13541402pixels are masked.  The large fraction of this masking is due to
    13551403regions that fall within the vignetted region.  Defining the diameter
    1356 of the unvignetted region to be 3 degrees, and excluding pixels that
    1357 fall beyond this point reduces the static masking fraction to 9.7\%.
     1404of the unvignetted region to have be 3 degrees, and excluding pixels
     1405that fall beyond this point reduces the static masking fraction to
     14069.7\%.
    13581407
    13591408Unfortunately, due to the design of the OTAs and readout cells, a
     
    13731422across the field of view.  Dynamic masking adds an additional $2-3\%$
    13741423on average, with advisory burntool masking contributing the largest
    1375 single component.
     1424single component.  Table \ref{tab:mask fraction} contains estimates of
     1425the mask fraction in the GPC1 detector footprint by the sources of the
     1426masking for the 3 degree field of view, as well as for a larger 3.25
     1427degree field of view that allows addition unvignetted regions in the
     1428corners to contribute.
     1429
     1430\begin{deluxetable}{lcc}
     1431  \tablecolumns{3}
     1432  \tablewidth{0pc}
     1433  \tablecaption{Mask Fraction by Mask Source}
     1434  \tablehead{\colhead{Mask Source}&\colhead{3 Degree FOV}&\colhead{3.25 Degree FOV}}
     1435  \startdata
     1436  No pixel        & 4.44\% & 9.47\% \\
     1437  Detector defect & 6.37\% & 7.91\% \\
     1438  CTE issue       & 2.62\% & 3.13\% \\
     1439  \enddata
     1440  \label{tab:mask fraction}
     1441\end{deluxetable}
     1442
     1443
    13761444
    13771445
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.