- Timestamp:
- Dec 28, 2017, 3:52:43 AM (9 years ago)
- File:
-
- 1 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
trunk/doc/release.2015/systematics.20140411/response.v1.tex
r40306 r40307 2 2 \begin{document} 3 3 \letterhead 4 5 We thank the referee for the careful and thoughtful examination of our 6 article. We particularly appreciate the suggestion to reduce the 7 number of figures and remove those that are superfluous. We have 8 removed the various scatter plots and replaced them with plots of the 9 radial run of the important effects, along with two plots showing the 10 radial run of the derivative of the smear compared with the 11 astrometric residuals and the derivative of the astrometric residuals 12 compared with the flat-field features. We have also removed the 13 5-filter panels for the astrometric, flat-field, smear, and shear 14 effects. We instead adjust the discussion to focus on the single 15 figure with all 6 effects shown for r-band. We have adjusted the 16 wording to account for the change in the figures. 17 18 Below are our point-by-point responses to the {\tt referee's suggestions}. 4 19 5 20 \begin{verbatim}
Note:
See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.
