wiki:MOPS_IASC20130319_tests130422

Context Navigation

Summary of MOPS_IASC20130319_tests130422

Summary of MOPS_IASC20130319_tests130422
MOPS to IASC object comparison
1. IASC Objects Missed in Diffims (Manual Inspection)
Targeted Object Tests
1. K03R03M
2. TVPS4EK
3. TVPS48A
4. TVPS4BM
Re-run tests (in progress)
1. diffim stats

Comparison of MOPS diffim discoveries to IASC visual chip inspection for OSS.20130319

Related summary pages:

MOPS/IASC sample exposures to compare to (162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 1-4, quad) stage _id:

| exp_id | exp_name    | dateobs             | comment                           |
+--------+-------------+---------------------+-----------------------------------+
| 590994 | o6370g0351o | 2013-03-19 11:37:26 | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 1 | 
| 591016 | o6370g0373o | 2013-03-19 11:59:29 | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 2 | 
| 591038 | o6370g0395o | 2013-03-19 12:21:39 | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 3 | 
| 591060 | o6370g0417o | 2013-03-19 12:43:52 | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 4 |

| exp_name    | comment                           | chip_id | warp_id |
+-------------+-----------------------------------+---------+---------+
| o6370g0351o | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 1 |  803498 |  759973 | 
| o6370g0373o | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 2 |  803520 |  759994 | 
| o6370g0395o | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 3 |  803542 |  760016 | 
| o6370g0417o | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 4 |  803564 |  760040 |

| diff_id | warp1  | warp2  | data_group   |
+---------+--------+--------+--------------+
|  406579 | 759973 | 759994 | OSS.20130319 |  -- v1-v2 pos, v2-v1 neg
|  406688 | 760016 | 760040 | OSS.20130319 |  -- v3-v4 pos, v4-v3 neg

Related MOPS czar pages: http://mopshq2.ifa.hawaii.edu/czar/psmops_ps1_mdrm152/tracklets.html?sort=d&limit=100&nn=56369&minv=0.1&sm=162.OSS.O&run_id=831

Datastore products:

pub.791526.diff.406579	2013-03-19T14:01:22Z	IPP-MOPS	162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 1 	o6370g0351o	o6370g0373o
pub.791568.diff.406688	2013-03-19T15:17:53Z	IPP-MOPS	162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 3 	o6370g0395o	o6370g0417o

3330813323.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791526.pos.mops
3330814731.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791526.neg.mops

3331155060.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791568.pos.mops
3331158431.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791568.neg.mops

MOPS to IASC object comparison

Missed IASC objects within ~2" in the diffims is ~30%

o6370g0351o	o6370g0373o
3330813323.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791526.pos.mops = 147/514
3330814731.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791526.neg.mops = 168/523

o6370g0395o	o6370g0417o
3331155060.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791568.pos.mops = 170/519
3331158431.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791568.neg.mops = 169/505

Need MOPS diffim object list to reverse compare.. -- will have to scan czar pages for them/example --

MOPS requires 3/4 detections in the quad, so looking at losses in one pair (i.e., visit 1 - visit 2) should indicate what kind of full object losses can occur.

IASC Objects Missed in Diffims (Manual Inspection)

Look at the (visit 1-visit 2, v12) pair exposures o6370g0351o, o6370g0373o where o6370g0351o detections are the pos, o6370g0373o detections are the neg in the diffim. The ppMops format catalog is used for matching to make it easier, so CMF->ppMops is not being tested here (should be okay).

3330813323.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791526.pos.mops = pos detection catalog
3330814731.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791526.neg.mops = neg detection catalog

Cases for missing matches:

S/N too low for detection in diffim -- really two cases and split as
- (faint) source just too faint to accomodate the S/N hit in normal diffims (will need additional match to SMF for photerr measurement)
- (conv) convolution fail and S/N degraded (could be dual convolution or wrong choice in convolving input or just bad convolution)
edge or masked -- could be two cases and split as
- (edge) edges and masks have growth factor from convolution
- (mask) non-target image has mask so diffim has mask (why WS diffim should be better in addition to S/N)

Quick visual inspection of diffim pair -- need to do the tedious look at full sample

Object	diffim	mode	skycell	ra dec	case type	comment

TVPS480	791526.pos	1	1278.021	185.470925 -3.000194	faint	not visual in diffim, smudge in warp. SMF detect MAG_SIG~0.15, CAL_PSF=22.5
TVPS485	791526.pos	1	1278.011	185.551467 -3.201447	faint	in overlap and no detection, SMF
TVPS48U		1	1278.042	185.025058 -2.092311	edge, faint	SMF
B1795		1	1278.042	184.876229 -2.043800	edge
TVPS48V		1	1278.042	185.086067 -2.171717	faint	SMF MAG_SIG~0.09 CAL_PSF=22.0
K11UO3A	791526.pos	1	1279.019	186.089088 -3.404686	edge and mask	cell edge and mask

Full visual inspection of diffim pair -- ppSub missed detection in both pos+neg pair

basically missed detection as both too faint or faint+edge loss

Object	ra dec	appmag	diffim	mode	skycell	case type (pos,neg)	comment

TVPS485	185.551467 -3.201447,	21.6,21.3	pos,neg	1		vf,vf	in both overlaps
TVPS487	185.602108 -3.264672	21.6,21.4	pos,neg			e,f	in both overlaps
TVPS488	185.704442 -3.207964	21.5,21.3	pos,neg			f+offset,f	larger rsep still missed
TVPS48B	185.449013 -3.043697	21.9,21.3	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS48C	185.376704 -3.143639	21.1,21.1	pos,neg			f,f
K07T69O	185.531729 -3.279842	21.3,21.5	pos,neg			e,f
TVPS48D	185.436400 -3.176547	21.3,20.6	pos,neg			e+m,f
TVPS48F	185.447825 -2.727447	21.4,21.3	pos,neg			f,f
K05TJ4H	185.329421 -2.713861	21.9,21.0	pos,neg			e,f
TVPS48H	185.195117 -2.761889	21.4,21.4	pos,neg			e,f
TVPS48J	185.238487 -2.294678	21.2,21.5	pos,neg			f,m
TVPS48O	185.096008 -2.386333	21.8,21.6	pos,neg			f,f+e
TVPS48P	185.138254 -2.471969	21.1,21.4	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS48R	185.269183 -2.579747	21.7,21.2	pos,neg			e,e
TVPS48S	185.135221 -2.652411	21.7,21.4	pos,neg			f,f+m?
TVPS48T	185.176733 -1.901081	21.4,21.1	pos,neg			vf,vf
TVPS48U	185.025058 -2.092311	21.7,21.4	pos,neg			vf,vf
TVPS48V	185.086067 -2.171717	21.1,21.2	pos,neg			vf,vf
K11UO3A	186.089088 -3.404686	21.4,21.1	pos,neg			vf,vf	cases of more noise maybe for appmag? vf can be subjective
TVPS48Y	185.890758 -2.817208	21.3,21.4	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS48Z	185.837467 -2.833739	21.7,21.0	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS491	185.856683 -2.980311	21.6,21.4	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS493	185.866308 -3.055908	21.7,21.5	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS494	185.954529 -3.019828	21.7,21.3	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS495	185.806383 -3.194658	21.4,21.4	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS496	185.763533 -2.483989	21.1,21.5	pos,neg			e,e
TVPS497	185.788867 -2.477608	22.0,21.9	pos,neg			vf,vf
TVPS498	185.703304 -2.488678	21.4,21.7	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS49A	185.844863 -2.584828	21.2,21.0	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS49E	185.619529 -2.548589	21.8,21.5	pos,neg			f+m+e,f
TVPS49H	185.560442 -2.135714	20.9,21.0	pos,neg			m,m
TVPS49I	185.682321 -2.208472	21.7,21.6	pos,neg			f+offset,f	larger rsep still misses
TVPS49K	185.471683 -2.273211	21.6,21.3	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS49Q	185.304283 -1.866297	21.7,21.0	pos,neg			vf,vf
TVPS49T	185.295304 -2.097936	21.5,21.5	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS49X	185.487646 -1.727797	21.6,21.5	pos,neg			vf,vf
TVPS49Y	185.240150 -1.595383	21.3,21.3	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4A1	186.386033 -3.389906	21.3,21.3	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4A5	186.375692 -3.462750	20.9,21.1	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4A6	186.430675 -3.543658	21.3,21.5	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4A9	186.399775 -3.321569	21.7,21.1	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4AF	186.294958 -2.929803	21.2,21.1	pos,neg		1279.029	f,f	visually similar
TVPS4AK	186.069067 -2.450922	21.2,21.5	pos,neg			f,f
65264	185.790675 -2.075339	17.9,19.1	pos,neg			e,e
TVPS4AU	185.908817 -2.287042	21.4,21.3	pos,neg			f+m?,f
TVPS4B1	185.716254 -1.342281	20.9,20.8	pos,neg			f+m?,f
TVPS4B4	185.613296 -1.487078	21.5,21.5	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4BA	185.639492 -1.625044	21.5,21.4	pos,neg			f+m,f
TVPS4BB	185.557842 -1.637764	21.3,21.3	pos,neg			vf,vf
TVPS4BH	185.434579 -1.284675	21.5,21.6	pos,neg			vf,vf
TVPS4BO	186.712571 -3.562686	21.8,21.3	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4BR	186.752688 -3.173767	21.3,21.8	pos,neg			vf,vf
TVPS4BS	186.716596 -3.205628	21.3,21.5	pos,neg			f,f
K05SC0L	186.621025 -3.191994	21.7,21.1	pos,neg		1279.028	vf,vf	visually similar
TVPS4BZ	186.555238 -3.219100	21.7,21.2	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4C7	186.471383 -2.247053	21.1,20.9	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4C8	186.372029 -2.358042	21.1,21.8	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4CB	186.188854 -2.395989	21.3,21.5	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4CF	186.208296 -2.008942	21.1,20.9	pos,neg			e,f
TVPS4CG	186.297304 -2.006631	21.6,21.6	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4CJ	186.296775 -2.173414	21.2,20.6	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4CL	186.120683 -1.982564	21.4,21.3	pos,neg			e,e
K03SO5H	186.207967 -2.170856	20.9,21.5	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4CV	185.969525 -1.525881	21.4,21.3	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4D8	187.224912 -3.295600	21.1,21.0	pos,neg			f,f	visually similar
A7215	186.743313 -2.871031	18.5,18.4	pos,neg			offset,e	larger rsep not recover
TVPS4DF	187.051842 -2.916697	21.1,21.0	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4DH	186.946937 -2.876889	21.1,20.7	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4DM	186.693333 -2.506967	21.7,21.5	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4DP	186.829358 -2.438092	21.4,21.0	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4DR	186.585500 -2.245550	21.4,20.4	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4DT	186.759450 -2.250128	21.8,21.5	pos,neg			f,f
K05UN6T	186.736796 -2.149022	21.4,21.1	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4DV	186.694925 -2.108381	21.7,21.5	pos,neg			f,f
K10F49B	186.418096 -1.990869	21.1,20.9	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4DX	186.526221 -2.007050	21.5,21.5	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4EH	186.222671 -1.299456	21.0,21.1	pos,neg	2	1279.069	vf,vf
TVPS4EM	186.073854 -0.966369	21.2,21.0	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4EQ	187.461733 -3.295331	21.1,21.4	pos,neg			f,f
K05O04V	187.260400 -3.103500	21.4,21.3	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4ES	187.371058 -3.141456	21.4,21.2	pos,neg			e,f
TVPS4EX	187.430400 -2.989214	21.7,21.3	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4F0	187.226675 -2.842825	21.5,21.3	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4F5	187.360433 -2.741858	21.3,21.3	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4F8	187.113513 -2.558175	21.6,21.5	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4FB	186.974271 -2.076172	21.4,21.4	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4FK	186.603896 -1.563450	21.6,21.6	pos,neg	2	1279.068	f,f
TVPS4FN	186.484567 -1.267308	21.2,21.4	pos,neg	2	1279.068	f,f	near brightstar resid as well
TVPS4FO	186.491658 -1.067872	20.7,21.0	pos,neg			f,f
K04PB1L	186.456537 -0.927408	21.4,20.6	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4FU	186.514275 -0.899253	21.9,21.9	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4FV	186.514496 -0.660972	21.3,21.3	pos,neg			f,f
K8213	186.446137 -0.749417	19.9,20.9	pos,neg			e,e
K05Q57E	187.504233 -2.443683	21.1,21.6	pos,neg			vf,vf
TVPS4G3	187.572525 -2.364994	21.8,21.1	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4G4	187.528400 -2.132828	21.4,21.0	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4G6	187.493950 -1.956097	21.7,21.3	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4G9	187.148842 -1.753372	20.3,21.5	pos,neg			f,e
TVPS4GD	187.117233 -1.586464	21.6,21.1	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4GF	187.229046 -1.563286	21.7,21.5	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4GH	187.110704 -1.473361	21.1,21.2	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4GJ	186.848421 -1.035197	21.4,21.7	pos,neg			e,f
TVPS4GM	186.874667 -0.845678	21.6,20.9	pos,neg			m,f
TVPS4GQ	187.773179 -2.281869	21.5,21.1	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4GU	187.892675 -2.034472	20.6,20.7	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4GZ	187.563854 -1.930244	21.9,21.5	pos,neg			f+m,f
TVPS4H1	187.815317 -1.955528	21.4,21.3	pos,neg			f,f
TVPS4HF	187.358679 -1.291761	20.8,20.8	pos,neg			f,f+e
TVPS4HL	187.416088 -1.164297	21.0,21.4	pos,neg			f+m?,f

initially missed in pos,neg pairing list above

TVPS4AS

185.937050 -2.299939

21.8,21.8

pos,neg

vf,vf

visually similar

Rough tally:

e,e=5
m,m (really same e,e)=1 -- can use for unconv recovery test as well
e,m mix=0
f,f and vf,vf =~83 -- out of ~500 objects is ~15% lost to just depth
c+f=0
f+e/m mix=~20 -- really means missed from f but uncertain so cannot use for faint test, will be part of edge test but because faint it is not good, an additional ~5% loss
odd/?/offset mix=3
total=109 -- this means 109 objects would be lost with the 3/4 detections required from a total of ~500 objects, or ~20% total
some types could be double counted..
if f+m/e then likely still f missed with other pair -- just excludes for missed/found pair (see pos or neg only below)
e,e/m,m etc is small fraction in this set -- all are faint+m+e mix, and order of <20% so not as large fraction

Full visual inspection of diffim pair -- ppSub missed detection in pos pair only

should be dominated by edge/mask losses
any missed due to brightness need detail re-run tests
(X) means no IASC detection to be missed for other pair (neg in this case)

Object	ra dec	appmag	diffim	mode	skycell	case type	comment

TVPS480	185.470925 -3.000194	20.9	pos		1278.021	vf,(Xm)	real even? no neg position in IASC, visually would be in gap
TVPS48A	185.402325 -3.043825	21.1	pos			f	visually similar to detection in neg
98392	185.403929 -3.323056	18.9	pos			offset	larger rsep matches, source of offset unclear..
TVPS48Q	185.136988 -2.552064	21.2	pos			f	visually similar to detection in neg
B1795	184.876229 -2.043800	19.9	pos			m
TVPS490	185.942813 -2.879264	21.6	pos		1278.020	vf,(Xf)	no IASC, visually fainter than pos
H3447	185.833717 -3.118958	20.7	pos			e	half missing in neg but still detected, likely flagged bad
TVPS49C	185.715196 -2.644217	21.5	pos			f	visually similar to detection in neg
TVPS49Z	185.249137 -1.676531	21.3	pos			e,(X)	no neg position in IASC as in gap
TVPS4AA	186.095200 -3.115725	19.0	pos			m
single0	186.035133 -2.735492	20.7	pos		1279.039	f,(Xe+m)	no neg in IASC large gap/mask region
K06SA5N	185.750917 -1.477864	21.0	pos			f	visually similar to detection in neg
single1	185.615929 -1.520094	21.6	pos			e,(X)	no neg in IASC, gap?
TVPS4B9	185.429333 -1.476703	20.9	pos			f	visually similar to detection in neg
TVPS4BW	186.536867 -3.001333	20.2	pos			f	visually similar to detection in neg
TVPS4C3	186.344775 -2.809728	20.1	pos			f	visually similar to detection in neg
TVPS4C4	186.498033 -2.798739	21.2	pos			vf,(X)	no neg in IASC, burn?
TVPS4CA	186.185842 -2.350814	20.9	pos			e
TVPS4CQ	185.988904 -1.730458	21.3	pos			e,(X)	no neg in IASC, gap?
TVPS4D2	185.851079 -1.200083	20.6	pos			e
TVPS4DB	187.188963 -3.161764	21.4	pos		1279.026,027	f,(X)	no neg in IASC, gap both overlaps
TVPS4DQ	186.679504 -2.449342	19.9	pos			e
TVPS4E1	186.685438 -1.986144	21.4	pos			f	visually similar to detection in neg
TVPS4E2	186.612842 -1.848086	20.9	pos			f,(X)	no neg in IASC, gap?
TVPS4E3	186.608962 -1.848264	21.8	pos			f,(X)	no neg in IASC, gap?
TVPS4EK	186.338829 -1.293461	21.8	pos	2	1279.069	f	visually similar to detection in neg
TVPS4EV	187.497400 -3.230928	21.2	pos			f	visually similar to detection in neg
K09F75T	187.506117 -2.898067	20.4	pos			m
K11S84R	187.106196 -2.473208	20.6	pos			f,(X)	no neg in IASC, gap?
B1755	187.100546 -1.854281	18.8	pos			m
TVPS4GR	187.786025 -2.271433	21.6	pos			m,(X)	no neg in IASC, gap
U9351	187.567304 -2.023533	21.6	pos			f	visually similar to detection in neg
K10T59X	187.620867 -1.825275	21.2	pos			f	visually similar to detection in neg
TVPS4H9	187.667225 -1.624142	21.4	pos			f,(Xvf)	no neg in IASC, vf
TVPS4HA	187.579942 -1.633053	21.4	pos			f	visually similar to detection in neg
TVPS4HC	187.623229 -1.382278	21.1	pos			f	visually similar to detection in neg
TVPS4HD	187.583942 -1.331408	21.0	pos			e

Rough tally:

edge=8
mask(really same)=4
e+m=0
faint=24 -- w/ IASC neg found 13, tells threshold for detection in contrast
conv+f=0
f+e/m=0
odd/?/offset=1
total=37
- e/m also ~30% so is an issue then here, should test run w/o conv. However, these are a smaller fraction to the faint loss.
- ones with neg detection when pos is f then need to note --
- of course many are pos missed because no IASC neg.. -- did the pos,neg pairing to look for any rejected by f and not f

Full visual inspection of diffim pair -- ppSub missed detection in neg pair only

should be dominated by edge/mask losses
any missed due to brightness need detail re-run tests
(X) means no IASC detection to be missed for other pair (pos in this case)

Object	ra dec	appmag	diffim	mode	skycell	case type	comment

TVPS482	185.631521 -3.015247	20.9	neg			f	visually similar to detection in pos
TVPS484	185.594963 -3.074931	21.4	neg			f	visually similar to detection in pos
A2757	185.480808 -3.214328	18.9	neg			e+m	edge and/or mask in overlap
TVPS48G	185.201717 -2.832406	21.1	neg			f	visually similar to detection in pos
K06Ua0O	185.897592 -3.334936	21.3	neg			f	visually similar
TVPS49J	185.435792 -2.245775	20.7	neg			m
TVPS49N	185.493533 -2.488436	20.5	neg			e
K06U95J	185.503842 -2.038808	20.9	neg		1278.041	e	should be missing in pos as well? pos detection poor? neg bit more on edge
TVPS49U	185.327629 -1.717300	19.5	neg			e
TVPS4A0	185.251950 -1.722489	21.1	neg			f	visually similar
K02T22K	186.610433 -3.586989	20.6	neg			odd+f	odd
TVPS4A4	186.551613 -3.613858	20.7	neg			odd/low s/n?	higher noise in cell?
TVPS4AO	185.799033 -2.438203	21.1	neg			f	visually similar but near edge
TVPS4AX	185.887737 -1.834669	21.2	neg			(X),f	no pos in IASC, gap
TVPS4BK	186.950467 -3.515783	20.3	neg			e
TVPS4BM	186.722246 -3.322481	20.7	neg			f	visually similar
TVPS4BP	186.720696 -2.912394	20.8	neg			f	visually similar
TVPS4BZ	186.551600 -3.217058	21.2	neg			f	visually similar
TVPS4C1	186.644025 -2.717681	21.0	neg			(X),f	no pos in IASC, gap
K04TR7S	186.338450 -2.758308	21.7	neg			f	pos has mask and still detected..
TVPS4C5	186.432013 -2.883733	21.2	neg			?,f	visually similar, pos not in IASC list/confused with K10M59G?
K06Sd1K	186.234938 -2.381381	20.5	neg			e?	off edge? odd..
TVPS4CD	186.341671 -1.918475	21.6	neg			(X),e+f	no pos in IASC, gap
D0747	185.831196 -0.888922	19.2	neg			(X),e	no pos in IASC, edge
TVPS4CX	185.825329 -1.070672	20.7	neg			(X),e	no pos in IASC, edge
TVPS4D4	187.071950 -3.238781	19.9	neg			(X),e?	no pos in IASC, edge
TVPS4D5	187.014700 -3.257583	21.2	neg			(X),f	no pos in IASC, edge
TVPS4D9	187.175350 -3.290569	21.1	neg			(Xe),e?	no pos in IASC, edge
TVPS4DG	187.046163 -2.888339	20.9	neg			f
TVPS4DI	186.726896 -2.782917	20.9	neg			vf+e?
TVPS4DJ	186.709346 -2.617944	21.1	neg			f	visually similar
TVPS4DN	186.829996 -2.612617	20.7	neg			f	visually similar
TVPS4DR	186.582508 -2.244531	20.4	neg			f	visually similar
TVPS4DY	186.528267 -1.956247	21.4	neg			f	visually similar
K06R47B	186.302908 -1.460806	21.4	neg	2?	1279.069	(X),f	no pos in IASC, gap?
TVPS4EB	186.456792 -1.655658	20.9	neg			f	visually similar
H5432	186.362008 -1.142386	20.4	neg			(X),e	no pos in IASC, gap?
K06R47A	186.127575 -0.745444	21.0	neg	5	1279.089	c+f	visually similar, must compare why w/ convolution
TVPS4ET	187.258854 -3.095822	21.3	neg		1279.026	(X),m+e	pos would be in mask/gap
TVPS4EU	187.510700 -3.265703	21.2	neg			f	visually similar
85216	187.059017 -2.254719	19.0	neg			(X),e	no pos in IASC, gap?
TVPS4FF	186.718383 -1.767450	21.4	neg			(X),e+f	no pos in IASC, gap?
TVPS4FL	186.621071 -1.383236	20.5	neg	2	1279.068	m
K05Ug3T	186.484608 -1.008992	21.1	neg			(X),f	no pos in IASC, gap?
TVPS4FP	186.619567 -1.094914	21.1	neg			(X),f+e?	no pos in IASC, gap?
TVPS4FQ	186.415738 -0.865286	20.7	neg			f	visually similar, overlap on edge
75342	186.308017 -0.866217	18.9	neg			e
TVPS4FR	186.392446 -0.737722	20.5	neg	5	1279.089	(X),e+m	no pos in IASC, gap
TVPS4FY	187.542342 -2.633589	21.1	neg			f	visually similar
K05SF6M	187.541812 -2.198803	20.8	neg			f+m?	visually similar
K06UC6Q	187.314496 -1.957856	21.4	neg			e
TVPS4G7	187.433450 -1.903128	19.7	neg			?
TVPS4GA	187.163442 -1.695256	21.0	neg			(X),f	no pos in IASC, gap?
K04T93L	187.288825 -1.732531	21.0	neg			f	visually similar
TVPS4GK	186.791121 -1.020711	21.1	neg			f+m
TVPS4GP	187.855613 -2.348214	21.5	neg			(X),f	no pos in IASC, gap?
TVPS4GU	187.890083 -2.031800	20.7	neg			f	visually similar
TVPS4GY	187.563804 -2.022283	21.2	neg		1279.046	?,f	visually similar, pos in IASC list seems to be U9351 like next one
TVPS4H2	187.697729 -1.912231	19.6	neg		1279.055	?,?	visually similar, no pos or similar/confused with K09DD4K, should have neg detection, why not?
TVPS4H5	187.745054 -1.728358	21.4	neg			(X),f	no pos in IASC, gap?

Rough tally:

edge=13
mask(really same)=2
e+m=3
faint=29 -- w/ IASC pos found 21
conv+f=1
f+e/m=6
odd/?=6
total=60
~30-40% due to edge/masking, remaining are faint

Summary Plots

Missed pos,neg because faint

Missed pos only because faint

Missed neg only because faint

Targeted Object Tests

Looking at sample of randomly selected objects of different

K03R03M

Detected in v12 both pos,neg but with poorer than expected s/n

TVPS4EK

Missed in v12 pos detections (i.e., S/N<4) and convolved reference (mode2) but based on FWHM expected convolve input (mode1)

TVPS48A

Missed in v12 neg detections (i.e., S/N<4)

TVPS4BM

Missed in v12 neg detections (i.e., S/N<4) with many faint missed and not missed (list later)

Re-run tests (in progress)

diffim stats

For full OSS.20130319 diffim exposure/skycell sample:

convolve input = 1393
convolve template/reference/input 2 = 968

dual convolution = 179

-- need cam stage stat summary
      Input FWHM: 4.949776
      Reference FWHM: 5.265106

Only IASC exposures --

convolve input = 52, 51 (v1-v2, v3-v4)
convolve template/reference/input 2 = 2, 0
dual convolution = 3, 6

Dual convolution typically lower good_frac and on edges of FPA -- add samples?

add rerun details with dual convolution and no-dual convolution (issue is typically no-dual case has different kernel params)?

Last modified 13 years ago Last modified on Jul 11, 2013, 6:12:38 PM

Note: See TracWiki for help on using the wiki.

Download in other formats:

Plain Text