IPP Software Navigation Tools IPP Links Communication Pan-STARRS Links
wiki:MOPS_IASC20130319_tests130422

Version 11 (modified by Mark Huber, 13 years ago) ( diff )

--

Summary of MOPS_IASC20130319_tests130422

  1. Summary of MOPS_IASC20130319_tests130422
  2. MOPS to IASC object comparison
    1. IASC Objects Missed in Diffims (Manual Inspection)
      1. Full visual inspection of diffim pair -- ppSub missed detection in …
      2. Full visual inspection of diffim pair -- ppSub missed detection in pos …
      3. Full visual inspection of diffim pair -- ppSub missed detection in neg …
      4. Summary Plots
  3. Targeted Object Tests
    1. K03R03M
    2. TVPS4EK
    3. TVPS48A
    4. TVPS4BM
  4. Re-run tests (in progress)
    1. diffim stats

Comparison of MOPS diffim discoveries to IASC visual chip inspection for OSS.20130319

Related summary pages:

MOPS/IASC sample exposures to compare to (162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 1-4, quad) stage _id: 

| exp_id | exp_name    | dateobs             | comment                           |
+--------+-------------+---------------------+-----------------------------------+
| 590994 | o6370g0351o | 2013-03-19 11:37:26 | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 1 | 
| 591016 | o6370g0373o | 2013-03-19 11:59:29 | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 2 | 
| 591038 | o6370g0395o | 2013-03-19 12:21:39 | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 3 | 
| 591060 | o6370g0417o | 2013-03-19 12:43:52 | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 4 |

| exp_name    | comment                           | chip_id | warp_id |
+-------------+-----------------------------------+---------+---------+
| o6370g0351o | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 1 |  803498 |  759973 | 
| o6370g0373o | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 2 |  803520 |  759994 | 
| o6370g0395o | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 3 |  803542 |  760016 | 
| o6370g0417o | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 4 |  803564 |  760040 | 

| diff_id | warp1  | warp2  | data_group   |
+---------+--------+--------+--------------+
|  406579 | 759973 | 759994 | OSS.20130319 |  -- v1-v2 pos, v2-v1 neg
|  406688 | 760016 | 760040 | OSS.20130319 |  -- v3-v4 pos, v4-v3 neg

Related MOPS czar pages: ​http://mopshq2.ifa.hawaii.edu/czar/psmops_ps1_mdrm152/tracklets.html?sort=d&limit=100&nn=56369&minv=0.1&sm=162.OSS.O&run_id=831

Datastore products: 

pub.791526.diff.406579	2013-03-19T14:01:22Z	IPP-MOPS	162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 1 	o6370g0351o	o6370g0373o
pub.791568.diff.406688	2013-03-19T15:17:53Z	IPP-MOPS	162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 3 	o6370g0395o	o6370g0417o

3330813323.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791526.pos.mops
3330814731.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791526.neg.mops

3331155060.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791568.pos.mops
3331158431.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791568.neg.mops

MOPS to IASC object comparison

Missed IASC objects within ~2" in the diffims is ~30% 

o6370g0351o	o6370g0373o
3330813323.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791526.pos.mops = 147/514
3330814731.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791526.neg.mops = 168/523

o6370g0395o	o6370g0417o
3331155060.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791568.pos.mops = 170/519
3331158431.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791568.neg.mops = 169/505

Need MOPS diffim object list to reverse compare.. -- will have to scan czar pages for them/example --

MOPS requires 3/4 detections in the quad, so looking at losses in one pair (i.e., visit 1 - visit 2) should indicate what kind of full object losses can occur.

IASC Objects Missed in Diffims (Manual Inspection)

Look at the (visit 1-visit 2, v12) pair exposures o6370g0351o, o6370g0373o where o6370g0351o detections are the pos, o6370g0373o detections are the neg in the diffim. The ppMops format catalog is used for matching to make it easier, so CMF->ppMops is not being tested here (should be okay).

  • 3330813323.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791526.pos.mops = pos detection catalog
  • 3330814731.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791526.neg.mops = neg detection catalog

Cases for missing matches:

  • S/N too low for detection in diffim -- really two cases and split as
    • (faint) source just too faint to accomodate the S/N hit in normal diffims (will need additional match to SMF for photerr measurement)
    • (conv) convolution fail and S/N degraded (could be dual convolution or wrong choice in convolving input or just bad convolution)
  • edge or masked -- could be two cases and split as
    • (edge) edges and masks have growth factor from convolution
    • (mask) non-target image has mask so diffim has mask (why WS diffim should be better in addition to S/N)

Quick visual inspection of diffim pair -- need to do the tedious look at full sample

Object diffim mode skycell ra dec case type comment
TVPS480 791526.pos 1 1278.021 185.470925 -3.000194 faint not visual in diffim, smudge in warp. SMF detect MAG_SIG~0.15, CAL_PSF=22.5
TVPS485 791526.pos 1 1278.011 185.551467 -3.201447 faint in overlap and no detection, SMF
TVPS48U 1 1278.042 185.025058 -2.092311 edge, faint SMF
B1795 1 1278.042 184.876229 -2.043800 edge
TVPS48V 1 1278.042 185.086067 -2.171717 faint SMF MAG_SIG~0.09 CAL_PSF=22.0
K11UO3A 791526.pos 1 1279.019 186.089088 -3.404686 edge and mask cell edge and mask

Full visual inspection of diffim pair -- ppSub missed detection in both pos+neg pair

  • basically missed detection as both too faint or faint+edge loss
Object ra dec appmag diffim mode skycell case type (pos,neg) comment
TVPS485 185.551467 -3.201447, 21.6,21.3 pos,neg 1 vf,vf in both overlaps
TVPS487 185.602108 -3.264672 21.6,21.4 pos,neg e,f in both overlaps
TVPS488 185.704442 -3.207964 21.5,21.3 pos,neg f+offset,f larger rsep still missed
TVPS48B 185.449013 -3.043697 21.9,21.3 pos,neg f,f
TVPS48C 185.376704 -3.143639 21.1,21.1 pos,neg f,f
K07T69O 185.531729 -3.279842 21.3,21.5 pos,neg e,f
TVPS48D 185.436400 -3.176547 21.3,20.6 pos,neg e+m,f
TVPS48F 185.447825 -2.727447 21.4,21.3 pos,neg f,f
K05TJ4H 185.329421 -2.713861 21.9,21.0 pos,neg e,f
TVPS48H 185.195117 -2.761889 21.4,21.4 pos,neg e,f
TVPS48J 185.238487 -2.294678 21.2,21.5 pos,neg f,m
TVPS48O 185.096008 -2.386333 21.8,21.6 pos,neg f,f+e
TVPS48P 185.138254 -2.471969 21.1,21.4 pos,neg f,f
TVPS48R 185.269183 -2.579747 21.7,21.2 pos,neg e,e
TVPS48S 185.135221 -2.652411 21.7,21.4 pos,neg f,f+m?
TVPS48T 185.176733 -1.901081 21.4,21.1 pos,neg vf,vf
TVPS48U 185.025058 -2.092311 21.7,21.4 pos,neg vf,vf
TVPS48V 185.086067 -2.171717 21.1,21.2 pos,neg vf,vf
K11UO3A 186.089088 -3.404686 21.4,21.1 pos,neg vf,vf cases of more noise maybe for appmag? vf can be subjective
TVPS48Y 185.890758 -2.817208 21.3,21.4 pos,neg f,f
TVPS48Z 185.837467 -2.833739 21.7,21.0 pos,neg f,f
TVPS491 185.856683 -2.980311 21.6,21.4 pos,neg f,f
TVPS493 185.866308 -3.055908 21.7,21.5 pos,neg f,f
TVPS494 185.954529 -3.019828 21.7,21.3 pos,neg f,f
TVPS495 185.806383 -3.194658 21.4,21.4 pos,neg f,f
TVPS496 185.763533 -2.483989 21.1,21.5 pos,neg e,e
TVPS497 185.788867 -2.477608 22.0,21.9 pos,neg vf,vf
TVPS498 185.703304 -2.488678 21.4,21.7 pos,neg f,f
TVPS49A 185.844863 -2.584828 21.2,21.0 pos,neg f,f
TVPS49E 185.619529 -2.548589 21.8,21.5 pos,neg f+m+e,f
TVPS49H 185.560442 -2.135714 20.9,21.0 pos,neg m,m
TVPS49I 185.682321 -2.208472 21.7,21.6 pos,neg f+offset,f larger rsep still misses
TVPS49K 185.471683 -2.273211 21.6,21.3 pos,neg f,f
TVPS49Q 185.304283 -1.866297 21.7,21.0 pos,neg vf,vf
TVPS49T 185.295304 -2.097936 21.5,21.5 pos,neg f,f
TVPS49X 185.487646 -1.727797 21.6,21.5 pos,neg vf,vf
TVPS49Y 185.240150 -1.595383 21.3,21.3 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4A1 186.386033 -3.389906 21.3,21.3 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4A5 186.375692 -3.462750 20.9,21.1 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4A6 186.430675 -3.543658 21.3,21.5 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4A9 186.399775 -3.321569 21.7,21.1 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4AF 186.294958 -2.929803 21.2,21.1 pos,neg 1279.029 f,f visually similar
TVPS4AK 186.069067 -2.450922 21.2,21.5 pos,neg f,f
65264 185.790675 -2.075339 17.9,19.1 pos,neg e,e
TVPS4AU 185.908817 -2.287042 21.4,21.3 pos,neg f+m?,f
TVPS4B1 185.716254 -1.342281 20.9,20.8 pos,neg f+m?,f
TVPS4B4 185.613296 -1.487078 21.5,21.5 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4BA 185.639492 -1.625044 21.5,21.4 pos,neg f+m,f
TVPS4BB 185.557842 -1.637764 21.3,21.3 pos,neg vf,vf
TVPS4BH 185.434579 -1.284675 21.5,21.6 pos,neg vf,vf
TVPS4BO 186.712571 -3.562686 21.8,21.3 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4BR 186.752688 -3.173767 21.3,21.8 pos,neg vf,vf
TVPS4BS 186.716596 -3.205628 21.3,21.5 pos,neg f,f
K05SC0L 186.621025 -3.191994 21.7,21.1 pos,neg 1279.028 vf,vf visually similar
TVPS4BZ 186.555238 -3.219100 21.7,21.2 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4C7 186.471383 -2.247053 21.1,20.9 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4C8 186.372029 -2.358042 21.1,21.8 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4CB 186.188854 -2.395989 21.3,21.5 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4CF 186.208296 -2.008942 21.1,20.9 pos,neg e,f
TVPS4CG 186.297304 -2.006631 21.6,21.6 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4CJ 186.296775 -2.173414 21.2,20.6 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4CL 186.120683 -1.982564 21.4,21.3 pos,neg e,e
K03SO5H 186.207967 -2.170856 20.9,21.5 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4CV 185.969525 -1.525881 21.4,21.3 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4D8 187.224912 -3.295600 21.1,21.0 pos,neg f,f visually similar
A7215 186.743313 -2.871031 18.5,18.4 pos,neg offset,e larger rsep not recover
TVPS4DF 187.051842 -2.916697 21.1,21.0 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4DH 186.946937 -2.876889 21.1,20.7 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4DM 186.693333 -2.506967 21.7,21.5 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4DP 186.829358 -2.438092 21.4,21.0 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4DR 186.585500 -2.245550 21.4,20.4 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4DT 186.759450 -2.250128 21.8,21.5 pos,neg f,f
K05UN6T 186.736796 -2.149022 21.4,21.1 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4DV 186.694925 -2.108381 21.7,21.5 pos,neg f,f
K10F49B 186.418096 -1.990869 21.1,20.9 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4DX 186.526221 -2.007050 21.5,21.5 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4EH 186.222671 -1.299456 21.0,21.1 pos,neg 2 1279.069 vf,vf
TVPS4EM 186.073854 -0.966369 21.2,21.0 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4EQ 187.461733 -3.295331 21.1,21.4 pos,neg f,f
K05O04V 187.260400 -3.103500 21.4,21.3 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4ES 187.371058 -3.141456 21.4,21.2 pos,neg e,f
TVPS4EX 187.430400 -2.989214 21.7,21.3 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4F0 187.226675 -2.842825 21.5,21.3 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4F5 187.360433 -2.741858 21.3,21.3 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4F8 187.113513 -2.558175 21.6,21.5 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4FB 186.974271 -2.076172 21.4,21.4 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4FK 186.603896 -1.563450 21.6,21.6 pos,neg 2 1279.068 f,f
TVPS4FN 186.484567 -1.267308 21.2,21.4 pos,neg 2 1279.068 f,f near brightstar resid as well
TVPS4FO 186.491658 -1.067872 20.7,21.0 pos,neg f,f
K04PB1L 186.456537 -0.927408 21.4,20.6 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4FU 186.514275 -0.899253 21.9,21.9 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4FV 186.514496 -0.660972 21.3,21.3 pos,neg f,f
K8213 186.446137 -0.749417 19.9,20.9 pos,neg e,e
K05Q57E 187.504233 -2.443683 21.1,21.6 pos,neg vf,vf
TVPS4G3 187.572525 -2.364994 21.8,21.1 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4G4 187.528400 -2.132828 21.4,21.0 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4G6 187.493950 -1.956097 21.7,21.3 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4G9 187.148842 -1.753372 20.3,21.5 pos,neg f,e
TVPS4GD 187.117233 -1.586464 21.6,21.1 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4GF 187.229046 -1.563286 21.7,21.5 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4GH 187.110704 -1.473361 21.1,21.2 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4GJ 186.848421 -1.035197 21.4,21.7 pos,neg e,f
TVPS4GM 186.874667 -0.845678 21.6,20.9 pos,neg m,f
TVPS4GQ 187.773179 -2.281869 21.5,21.1 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4GU 187.892675 -2.034472 20.6,20.7 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4GZ 187.563854 -1.930244 21.9,21.5 pos,neg f+m,f
TVPS4H1 187.815317 -1.955528 21.4,21.3 pos,neg f,f
TVPS4HF 187.358679 -1.291761 20.8,20.8 pos,neg f,f+e
TVPS4HL 187.416088 -1.164297 21.0,21.4 pos,neg f+m?,f
  • initially missed in pos,neg pairing list above
TVPS4AS 185.937050 -2.299939 21.8,21.8 pos,neg vf,vf visually similar

Rough tally:

  • e,e=5
  • m,m (really same e,e)=1 -- can use for unconv recovery test as well
  • e,m mix=0
  • f,f and vf,vf =~83 -- out of ~500 objects is ~15% lost to just depth
  • c+f=0
  • f+e/m mix=~20 -- really means missed from f but uncertain so cannot use for faint test, will be part of edge test but because faint it is not good, an additional ~5% loss
  • odd/?/offset mix=3
  • total=109 -- this means 109 objects would be lost with the 3/4 detections required from a total of ~500 objects, or ~20% total
  • some types could be double counted..
  • if f+m/e then likely still f missed with other pair -- just excludes for missed/found pair (see pos or neg only below)
  • e,e/m,m etc is small fraction in this set -- all are faint+m+e mix, and order of <20% so not as large fraction

Full visual inspection of diffim pair -- ppSub missed detection in pos pair only

  • should be dominated by edge/mask losses
  • any missed due to brightness need detail re-run tests
  • (X) means no IASC detection to be missed for other pair (neg in this case)
Object ra dec appmag diffim mode skycell case type comment
TVPS480 185.470925 -3.000194 20.9 pos 1278.021 vf,(Xm) real even? no neg position in IASC, visually would be in gap
TVPS48A 185.402325 -3.043825 21.1 pos f visually similar to detection in neg
98392 185.403929 -3.323056 18.9 pos offset larger rsep matches, source of offset unclear..
TVPS48Q 185.136988 -2.552064 21.2 pos f visually similar to detection in neg
B1795 184.876229 -2.043800 19.9 pos m
TVPS490 185.942813 -2.879264 21.6 pos 1278.020 vf,(Xf) no IASC, visually fainter than pos
H3447 185.833717 -3.118958 20.7 pos e half missing in neg but still detected, likely flagged bad
TVPS49C 185.715196 -2.644217 21.5 pos f visually similar to detection in neg
TVPS49Z 185.249137 -1.676531 21.3 pos e,(X) no neg position in IASC as in gap
TVPS4AA 186.095200 -3.115725 19.0 pos m
single0 186.035133 -2.735492 20.7 pos 1279.039 f,(Xe+m) no neg in IASC large gap/mask region
K06SA5N 185.750917 -1.477864 21.0 pos f visually similar to detection in neg
single1 185.615929 -1.520094 21.6 pos e,(X) no neg in IASC, gap?
TVPS4B9 185.429333 -1.476703 20.9 pos f visually similar to detection in neg
TVPS4BW 186.536867 -3.001333 20.2 pos f visually similar to detection in neg
TVPS4C3 186.344775 -2.809728 20.1 pos f visually similar to detection in neg
TVPS4C4 186.498033 -2.798739 21.2 pos vf,(X) no neg in IASC, burn?
TVPS4CA 186.185842 -2.350814 20.9 pos e
TVPS4CQ 185.988904 -1.730458 21.3 pos e,(X) no neg in IASC, gap?
TVPS4D2 185.851079 -1.200083 20.6 pos e
TVPS4DB 187.188963 -3.161764 21.4 pos 1279.026,027 f,(X) no neg in IASC, gap both overlaps
TVPS4DQ 186.679504 -2.449342 19.9 pos e
TVPS4E1 186.685438 -1.986144 21.4 pos f visually similar to detection in neg
TVPS4E2 186.612842 -1.848086 20.9 pos f,(X) no neg in IASC, gap?
TVPS4E3 186.608962 -1.848264 21.8 pos f,(X) no neg in IASC, gap?
TVPS4EK 186.338829 -1.293461 21.8 pos 2 1279.069 f visually similar to detection in neg
TVPS4EV 187.497400 -3.230928 21.2 pos f visually similar to detection in neg
K09F75T 187.506117 -2.898067 20.4 pos m
K11S84R 187.106196 -2.473208 20.6 pos f,(X) no neg in IASC, gap?
B1755 187.100546 -1.854281 18.8 pos m
TVPS4GR 187.786025 -2.271433 21.6 pos m,(X) no neg in IASC, gap
U9351 187.567304 -2.023533 21.6 pos f visually similar to detection in neg
K10T59X 187.620867 -1.825275 21.2 pos f visually similar to detection in neg
TVPS4H9 187.667225 -1.624142 21.4 pos f,(Xvf) no neg in IASC, vf
TVPS4HA 187.579942 -1.633053 21.4 pos f visually similar to detection in neg
TVPS4HC 187.623229 -1.382278 21.1 pos f visually similar to detection in neg
TVPS4HD 187.583942 -1.331408 21.0 pos e

Rough tally:

  • edge=8
  • mask(really same)=4
  • e+m=0
  • faint=24 -- w/ IASC neg found 13, tells threshold for detection in contrast
  • conv+f=0
  • f+e/m=0
  • odd/?/offset=1
  • total=37
    • e/m also ~30% so is an issue then here, should test run w/o conv. However, these are a smaller fraction to the faint loss.
    • ones with neg detection when pos is f then need to note --
    • of course many are pos missed because no IASC neg.. -- did the pos,neg pairing to look for any rejected by f and not f

Full visual inspection of diffim pair -- ppSub missed detection in neg pair only

  • should be dominated by edge/mask losses
  • any missed due to brightness need detail re-run tests
  • (X) means no IASC detection to be missed for other pair (pos in this case)
Object ra dec appmag diffim mode skycell case type comment
TVPS482 185.631521 -3.015247 20.9 neg f visually similar to detection in pos
TVPS484 185.594963 -3.074931 21.4 neg f visually similar to detection in pos
A2757 185.480808 -3.214328 18.9 neg e+m edge and/or mask in overlap
TVPS48G 185.201717 -2.832406 21.1 neg f visually similar to detection in pos
K06Ua0O 185.897592 -3.334936 21.3 neg f visually similar
TVPS49J 185.435792 -2.245775 20.7 neg m
TVPS49N 185.493533 -2.488436 20.5 neg e
K06U95J 185.503842 -2.038808 20.9 neg 1278.041 e should be missing in pos as well? pos detection poor? neg bit more on edge
TVPS49U 185.327629 -1.717300 19.5 neg e
TVPS4A0 185.251950 -1.722489 21.1 neg f visually similar
K02T22K 186.610433 -3.586989 20.6 neg odd+f odd
TVPS4A4 186.551613 -3.613858 20.7 neg odd/low s/n? higher noise in cell?
TVPS4AO 185.799033 -2.438203 21.1 neg f visually similar but near edge
TVPS4AX 185.887737 -1.834669 21.2 neg (X),f no pos in IASC, gap
TVPS4BK 186.950467 -3.515783 20.3 neg e
TVPS4BM 186.722246 -3.322481 20.7 neg f visually similar
TVPS4BP 186.720696 -2.912394 20.8 neg f visually similar
TVPS4BZ 186.551600 -3.217058 21.2 neg f visually similar
TVPS4C1 186.644025 -2.717681 21.0 neg (X),f no pos in IASC, gap
K04TR7S 186.338450 -2.758308 21.7 neg f pos has mask and still detected..
TVPS4C5 186.432013 -2.883733 21.2 neg ?,f visually similar, pos not in IASC list/confused with K10M59G?
K06Sd1K 186.234938 -2.381381 20.5 neg e? off edge? odd..
TVPS4CD 186.341671 -1.918475 21.6 neg (X),e+f no pos in IASC, gap
D0747 185.831196 -0.888922 19.2 neg (X),e no pos in IASC, edge
TVPS4CX 185.825329 -1.070672 20.7 neg (X),e no pos in IASC, edge
TVPS4D4 187.071950 -3.238781 19.9 neg (X),e? no pos in IASC, edge
TVPS4D5 187.014700 -3.257583 21.2 neg (X),f no pos in IASC, edge
TVPS4D9 187.175350 -3.290569 21.1 neg (Xe),e? no pos in IASC, edge
TVPS4DG 187.046163 -2.888339 20.9 neg f
TVPS4DI 186.726896 -2.782917 20.9 neg vf+e?
TVPS4DJ 186.709346 -2.617944 21.1 neg f visually similar
TVPS4DN 186.829996 -2.612617 20.7 neg f visually similar
TVPS4DR 186.582508 -2.244531 20.4 neg f visually similar
TVPS4DY 186.528267 -1.956247 21.4 neg f visually similar
K06R47B 186.302908 -1.460806 21.4 neg 2? 1279.069 (X),f no pos in IASC, gap?
TVPS4EB 186.456792 -1.655658 20.9 neg f visually similar
H5432 186.362008 -1.142386 20.4 neg (X),e no pos in IASC, gap?
K06R47A 186.127575 -0.745444 21.0 neg 5 1279.089 c+f visually similar, must compare why w/ convolution
TVPS4ET 187.258854 -3.095822 21.3 neg 1279.026 (X),m+e pos would be in mask/gap
TVPS4EU 187.510700 -3.265703 21.2 neg f visually similar
85216 187.059017 -2.254719 19.0 neg (X),e no pos in IASC, gap?
TVPS4FF 186.718383 -1.767450 21.4 neg (X),e+f no pos in IASC, gap?
TVPS4FL 186.621071 -1.383236 20.5 neg 2 1279.068 m
K05Ug3T 186.484608 -1.008992 21.1 neg (X),f no pos in IASC, gap?
TVPS4FP 186.619567 -1.094914 21.1 neg (X),f+e? no pos in IASC, gap?
TVPS4FQ 186.415738 -0.865286 20.7 neg f visually similar, overlap on edge
75342 186.308017 -0.866217 18.9 neg e
TVPS4FR 186.392446 -0.737722 20.5 neg 5 1279.089 (X),e+m no pos in IASC, gap
TVPS4FY 187.542342 -2.633589 21.1 neg f visually similar
K05SF6M 187.541812 -2.198803 20.8 neg f+m? visually similar
K06UC6Q 187.314496 -1.957856 21.4 neg e
TVPS4G7 187.433450 -1.903128 19.7 neg ?
TVPS4GA 187.163442 -1.695256 21.0 neg (X),f no pos in IASC, gap?
K04T93L 187.288825 -1.732531 21.0 neg f visually similar
TVPS4GK 186.791121 -1.020711 21.1 neg f+m
TVPS4GP 187.855613 -2.348214 21.5 neg (X),f no pos in IASC, gap?
TVPS4GU 187.890083 -2.031800 20.7 neg f visually similar
TVPS4GY 187.563804 -2.022283 21.2 neg 1279.046 ?,f visually similar, pos in IASC list seems to be U9351 like next one
TVPS4H2 187.697729 -1.912231 19.6 neg 1279.055 ?,? visually similar, no pos or similar/confused with K09DD4K, should have neg detection, why not?
TVPS4H5 187.745054 -1.728358 21.4 neg (X),f no pos in IASC, gap?

Rough tally:

  • edge=13
  • mask(really same)=2
  • e+m=3
  • faint=29 -- w/ IASC pos found 21
  • conv+f=1
  • f+e/m=6
  • odd/?=6
  • total=60
  • ~30-40% due to edge/masking, remaining are faint

Summary Plots

Missed pos,neg because faint

Missed pos only because faint

Missed neg only because faint

Targeted Object Tests

Looking at sample of randomly selected objects of different

K03R03M

Detected in v12 both pos,neg but with poorer than expected s/n

TVPS4EK

Missed in v12 pos detections (i.e., S/N<4) and convolved reference (mode2) but based on FWHM expected convolve input (mode1)

TVPS48A

Missed in v12 neg detections (i.e., S/N<4)

TVPS4BM

Missed in v12 neg detections (i.e., S/N<4) with many faint missed and not missed (list later)

Re-run tests (in progress)

diffim stats

For full OSS.20130319 diffim exposure/skycell sample:

  • convolve input = 1393
  • convolve template/reference/input 2 = 968
  • dual convolution = 179 
    -- need cam stage stat summary
      Input FWHM: 4.949776
      Reference FWHM: 5.265106

Only IASC exposures --

  • convolve input = 52, 51 (v1-v2, v3-v4)
  • convolve template/reference/input 2 = 2, 0
  • dual convolution = 3, 6

Dual convolution typically lower good_frac and on edges of FPA -- add samples?

add rerun details with dual convolution and no-dual convolution (issue is typically no-dual case has different kernel params)?

Note: See TracWiki for help on using the wiki.