Back to http://svn.pan-starrs.ifa.hawaii.edu/trac/ipp/wiki/Zoology
Outline
This page outlines an investigation into the cross-matching used by the Durham group to generate the 'true positives' and 'false positives' data subsets. Durham used TOPCAT to perform the cross-match, and presented the results as FITS files. Our aim is to reproduce the same results as Durham then experiment with different cross-matching parameters.
Coverage
As can be seen from the plot below, the section of Sloan stripe 82 used by Durham does not fully cover the SAS footprint. This needs to be taken into account when performing crossmatching and determining false positives.
Durham-supplied data
Durham supplied the following files (FITS binary table format) for analysis.
| File | Rows | Comments |
| footprint-stripe82.fits | 449,254 | Sloan Stripe 82 master file |
| footprint-g-all-psphot.fits.bz2 | 282,604 | all IPP g filter |
| footprint-r-all-psphot.fits.bz2 | 278,280 | all IPP r filter |
| footprint-i-all-psphot.fits.bz2 | 320,655 | all IPP i filter |
| footprint-z-all-psphot.fits.bz2 | 258,130 | all IPP z filter |
| footprint-y-all-psphot.fits.bz2 | 175,578 | all IPP y filter |
| footprint-g-not-matched-psphot.fits.bz2 | 171,973 | all IPP false detections in g |
| footprint-r-not-matched-psphot.fits.bz2 | 67,455 | all IPP false detections in r |
| footprint-i-not-matched-psphot.fits.bz2 | 59,973 | all IPP false detections in i |
| footprint-y-not-matched-psphot.fits.bz2 | 46,729 | all IPP false detections in z |
| footprint-z-not-matched-psphot.fits.bz2 | 51,391 | all IPP false detections in y |
Durham cross-matching
Durham used TOPCAT to perform the cross-matching. They used the following settings:
- 'Algorithm' : Sky
- 'Max Error' : 1.0 arcsec
- 'Match Selection' : Best Match Only
It is thought (by Nigel Metcalfe) that Peter Draper cut the Sloan data on BINNED1 = true. I applied this cut, and it only removed 428 sourced out of a total of 449,254.
Tiger-team cross-matching
We attempt to first reproduce the Durham results, then experiment with different cross-matching constraints.
Attempts to reproduce Durham results
Using TOPCAT with the same data and same settings as Durham, while also first removing all IPP detections outwith Stripe 82, we are able produce the the same results (we cut the Sloan data using BINNED1 = true, as above).
Results of all cross-matching are shown on the spreadsheet here
Cross-matching with different error radii
Attachments (2)
- coverage.gif (240.5 KB ) - added by 15 years ago.
- chart1.png (9.9 KB ) - added by 15 years ago.
Download all attachments as: .zip


