IPP Software Navigation Tools IPP Links Communication Pan-STARRS Links
wiki:ZoologyCrossmatching

Back to http://svn.pan-starrs.ifa.hawaii.edu/trac/ipp/wiki/Zoology

Outline

This page outlines an investigation into the cross-matching used by the Durham group to generate the 'true positives' and 'false positives' data subsets. Durham used TOPCAT to perform the cross-match, and presented the results as FITS files. Our aim is to reproduce the same results as Durham then experiment with different cross-matching parameters.

Coverage

As can be seen from the plot below, the section of Sloan stripe 82 used by Durham does not fully cover the SAS footprint. This needs to be taken into account when performing crossmatching and determining false positives.

Durham-supplied data

Durham supplied the following files (FITS binary table format) for analysis.

File Rows Comments
footprint-stripe82.fits 449,254 Sloan Stripe 82 master file
footprint-g-all-psphot.fits.bz2 282,604 all IPP g filter
footprint-r-all-psphot.fits.bz2 278,280 all IPP r filter
footprint-i-all-psphot.fits.bz2 320,655 all IPP i filter
footprint-z-all-psphot.fits.bz2 258,130 all IPP z filter
footprint-y-all-psphot.fits.bz2 175,578 all IPP y filter
footprint-g-not-matched-psphot.fits.bz2 171,973 all IPP false detections in g
footprint-r-not-matched-psphot.fits.bz2 67,455 all IPP false detections in r
footprint-i-not-matched-psphot.fits.bz2 59,973 all IPP false detections in i
footprint-y-not-matched-psphot.fits.bz2 46,729 all IPP false detections in z
footprint-z-not-matched-psphot.fits.bz2 51,391 all IPP false detections in y

Durham cross-matching

Durham used TOPCAT to perform the cross-matching. They used the following settings:

  • 'Algorithm' : Sky
  • 'Max Error' : 1.0 arcsec
  • 'Match Selection' : Best Match Only

It is thought (by Nigel Metcalfe) that Peter Draper cut the Sloan data on BINNED1 = true. I applied this cut, and it only removed 428 sourced out of a total of 449,254.

Tiger-team cross-matching

We attempt to first reproduce the Durham results, then experiment with different cross-matching constraints.

Attempts to reproduce Durham results

Using TOPCAT with the same data and same settings as Durham, while also first removing all IPP detections outwith Stripe 82, we are able produce the the same results (we cut the Sloan data using BINNED1 = true, as above).

Results of all cross-matching are shown on the spreadsheet here

Cross-matching with different error radii

Last modified 15 years ago Last modified on Sep 6, 2011, 9:56:37 AM

Attachments (2)

Download all attachments as: .zip

Note: See TracWiki for help on using the wiki.